Profiling paramedic job tasks, injuries, and physical fitness: A scoping review.

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104459
Elizabeth Marsh, Robin Orr, Elisa F D Canetti, Ben Schram
{"title":"Profiling paramedic job tasks, injuries, and physical fitness: A scoping review.","authors":"Elizabeth Marsh, Robin Orr, Elisa F D Canetti, Ben Schram","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this review was to identify, collect, appraise, and synthesise research profiling paramedic job tasks, injuries sustained, and current fitness levels, to guide optimal workplace performance and enhance injury mitigation efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews, four databases (PubMed, SPORTdiscus, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched using key search terms (derivatives of 'paramedic' and 'injury', 'physical fitness' and 'tasks'). Identified records were screened against eligibility criteria with remaining studies critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1675 identified records, 33 were retained. Musculoskeletal injuries exhibited the highest mean injury rate, with sprains and strains the predominant nature of injury, and the back the most frequently injured body part. Among paramedics, handling stretchers and equipment posed the most challenging tasks while for Emergency Medical Services patient extraction was the most physically and mentally demanding task. Male paramedics were generally stronger with more muscular endurance, but less flexibility, than female paramedics. Older paramedics displayed lower levels of strength and flexibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tasks involving stretcher handling and patient extraction are reported as being most strenuous for paramedics leading to musculoskeletal injuries, particularly sprains, strains, and back injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"104459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this review was to identify, collect, appraise, and synthesise research profiling paramedic job tasks, injuries sustained, and current fitness levels, to guide optimal workplace performance and enhance injury mitigation efforts.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews, four databases (PubMed, SPORTdiscus, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched using key search terms (derivatives of 'paramedic' and 'injury', 'physical fitness' and 'tasks'). Identified records were screened against eligibility criteria with remaining studies critically appraised.

Results: Of 1675 identified records, 33 were retained. Musculoskeletal injuries exhibited the highest mean injury rate, with sprains and strains the predominant nature of injury, and the back the most frequently injured body part. Among paramedics, handling stretchers and equipment posed the most challenging tasks while for Emergency Medical Services patient extraction was the most physically and mentally demanding task. Male paramedics were generally stronger with more muscular endurance, but less flexibility, than female paramedics. Older paramedics displayed lower levels of strength and flexibility.

Conclusion: Tasks involving stretcher handling and patient extraction are reported as being most strenuous for paramedics leading to musculoskeletal injuries, particularly sprains, strains, and back injuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析护理人员的工作任务,伤害和身体健康:范围审查。
引言:本综述的目的是识别、收集、评估和综合研究概况,包括护理人员的工作任务、持续伤害和当前健康水平,以指导最佳工作场所绩效并加强伤害减轻工作。方法:根据范围审查的首选报告项目,使用关键搜索词(“护理人员”和“伤害”,“身体健康”和“任务”的衍生词)搜索四个数据库(PubMed, SPORTdiscus, CINAHL和Embase)。根据资格标准筛选确定的记录,并对剩余的研究进行严格评价。结果:1675份鉴定记录中,保留33份。肌肉骨骼损伤表现出最高的平均损伤率,扭伤和拉伤是主要的损伤性质,背部是最常受伤的身体部位。在护理人员中,搬运担架和设备是最具挑战性的任务,而在紧急医疗服务中,运送病人是最需要体力和精神的任务。男性护理人员通常比女性护理人员更强壮,肌肉耐力更强,但灵活性更差。年长的护理人员表现出较低的力量和柔韧性。结论:据报道,涉及担架操作和患者提取的任务对护理人员来说是最费力的,会导致肌肉骨骼损伤,特别是扭伤、拉伤和背部损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Differential effect of three types of exoskeletons and handling height on muscular activity, postural control and perceived effort during simulated bedside mobilization task. Navigating the complexity of emergency department care coordination: A qualitative exploration of adaptive strategies using a tabletop sandbox simulation. What is the optimal display range? Exploring the impacts of area and shape on in-vehicle head-up display efficiency. Development and validation of spatial disorientation scenarios using virtual reality and motion simulator. Evaluation of color in digital nuclear power plant control room displays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1