Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.4S
Fami Zekeriya Yusuf, Tesfaye Kebede, Michael Teklehaimanot Abera, Alemayehu Bedane, Assefa Getachew, Semira Abrar
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia.","authors":"Fami Zekeriya Yusuf, Tesfaye Kebede, Michael Teklehaimanot Abera, Alemayehu Bedane, Assefa Getachew, Semira Abrar","doi":"10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.4S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer remains a significant challenge in developing countries, with many patients diagnosed at advanced stages. The clinical staging of cervical cancer is guided by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) guidelines, while computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer valuable supplemental information. This study aimed to evaluate the initial clinical and imaging stages of cervical cancer and to assess the agreement between these staging methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 115 newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients at Tikur-Anbessa Specialized Hospital from September 1, 2022, to February 30, 2023. Clinical staging was performed for all patients, with CT staging for 107 and MRI staging for 34. Data were extracted from the hospital's central databases and analyzed using SPSS version 27. Descriptive and reliability analyses were conducted, with statistical significance set at a p-value of <0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At diagnosis, 61 patients (53%) presented with advanced clinical stages (III-IV). CT imaging indicated advanced stages in 85 patients (73.9%), while MRI was performed on 34 patients. Agreement between clinical and CT-based staging was poor (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.171, p = 0.016), while agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging was moderate (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.418, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients exhibit a high prevalence of advanced-stage disease. There is poor agreement between clinical and CT-based cervical cancer staging, contrasted with moderate agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":12003,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"34 Spec Iss 1","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v34i1.4S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains a significant challenge in developing countries, with many patients diagnosed at advanced stages. The clinical staging of cervical cancer is guided by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) guidelines, while computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer valuable supplemental information. This study aimed to evaluate the initial clinical and imaging stages of cervical cancer and to assess the agreement between these staging methods.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 115 newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients at Tikur-Anbessa Specialized Hospital from September 1, 2022, to February 30, 2023. Clinical staging was performed for all patients, with CT staging for 107 and MRI staging for 34. Data were extracted from the hospital's central databases and analyzed using SPSS version 27. Descriptive and reliability analyses were conducted, with statistical significance set at a p-value of <0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.

Results: At diagnosis, 61 patients (53%) presented with advanced clinical stages (III-IV). CT imaging indicated advanced stages in 85 patients (73.9%), while MRI was performed on 34 patients. Agreement between clinical and CT-based staging was poor (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.171, p = 0.016), while agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging was moderate (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.418, p = 0.007).

Conclusion: Newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients exhibit a high prevalence of advanced-stage disease. There is poor agreement between clinical and CT-based cervical cancer staging, contrasted with moderate agreement between clinical and MRI-based staging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is a general health science journal addressing clinical medicine, public health and biomedical sciences. Rarely, it covers veterinary medicine
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiography for Diagnosing Pneumonia in Children: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology for Ethiopia. Clinical and Radiological Features of Perianal Fistula: An MRI-Based Study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Ethiopia. Isolated Prostate Tuberculosis Mimicking Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1