A novel way to use cross-validation to measure connectivity by machine learning allows epilepsy surgery outcome prediction.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING NeuroImage Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120990
Karla Ivankovic, Alessandro Principe, Justo Montoya-Gálvez, Linus Manubens-Gil, Riccardo Zucca, Pablo Villoslada, Mara Dierssen, Rodrigo Rocamora
{"title":"A novel way to use cross-validation to measure connectivity by machine learning allows epilepsy surgery outcome prediction.","authors":"Karla Ivankovic, Alessandro Principe, Justo Montoya-Gálvez, Linus Manubens-Gil, Riccardo Zucca, Pablo Villoslada, Mara Dierssen, Rodrigo Rocamora","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rate of success of epilepsy surgery, ensuring seizure-freedom, is limited by the lack of epileptogenicity biomarkers. Previous evidence supports the critical role of functional connectivity during seizure generation to characterize the epileptogenic network (EN). However, EN dynamics is highly variable across patients, hindering the development of diagnostic biomarkers. Without relying on specific connectivity variables, we focused on a general hypothesis that the EN undergoes the greatest magnitude of connectivity change during seizure generation, compared to other brain networks. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel method for quantifying connectivity change between network states and applied it to identify surgical resection areas. A network state was represented by random snapshots of connectivity within a defined time interval of an intracranial EEG recording. A binary classifier was applied to classify two network states. The classifier generalization performance estimated by cross-validation was employed as a continuous measure of connectivity change. The algorithm generated a network by iteratively adding nodes until the connectivity change magnitude decreased. The resulting network was compared to the surgical resection, and the overlap score was used to predict post-surgical outcomes. The framework was evaluated in a consecutive cohort of 21 patients with a post-surgical follow-up of minimum 3 years. The best overlap between connectivity change networks and resections was obtained at the transition from pre-seizure to seizure (surgical outcome prediction ROC-AUC=90.3 %). However, all patients except one were correctly classified when considering the most informative time intervals. Time intervals proportional to seizure length were more informative than the almost universally used fixed intervals. This study demonstrates that connectivity can be successfully classified with a machine learning analysis and provide information for distinguishing a separate epileptogenic functional network. In summary, the connectivity change analysis could accurately identify epileptogenic networks validated by surgery outcome classification. Connectivity change magnitude at seizure transition could potentially serve as an EN biomarker. The tool provided by this study may aid surgical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":" ","pages":"120990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rate of success of epilepsy surgery, ensuring seizure-freedom, is limited by the lack of epileptogenicity biomarkers. Previous evidence supports the critical role of functional connectivity during seizure generation to characterize the epileptogenic network (EN). However, EN dynamics is highly variable across patients, hindering the development of diagnostic biomarkers. Without relying on specific connectivity variables, we focused on a general hypothesis that the EN undergoes the greatest magnitude of connectivity change during seizure generation, compared to other brain networks. To test this hypothesis, we developed a novel method for quantifying connectivity change between network states and applied it to identify surgical resection areas. A network state was represented by random snapshots of connectivity within a defined time interval of an intracranial EEG recording. A binary classifier was applied to classify two network states. The classifier generalization performance estimated by cross-validation was employed as a continuous measure of connectivity change. The algorithm generated a network by iteratively adding nodes until the connectivity change magnitude decreased. The resulting network was compared to the surgical resection, and the overlap score was used to predict post-surgical outcomes. The framework was evaluated in a consecutive cohort of 21 patients with a post-surgical follow-up of minimum 3 years. The best overlap between connectivity change networks and resections was obtained at the transition from pre-seizure to seizure (surgical outcome prediction ROC-AUC=90.3 %). However, all patients except one were correctly classified when considering the most informative time intervals. Time intervals proportional to seizure length were more informative than the almost universally used fixed intervals. This study demonstrates that connectivity can be successfully classified with a machine learning analysis and provide information for distinguishing a separate epileptogenic functional network. In summary, the connectivity change analysis could accurately identify epileptogenic networks validated by surgery outcome classification. Connectivity change magnitude at seizure transition could potentially serve as an EN biomarker. The tool provided by this study may aid surgical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种通过机器学习使用交叉验证来测量连通性的新方法允许癫痫手术结果预测。
癫痫手术的成功率,确保癫痫的自由发作,是有限的缺乏致痫性生物标志物。先前的证据支持在癫痫发生过程中功能连接的关键作用,以表征癫痫发生网络(EN)。然而,不同患者的EN动态变化很大,阻碍了诊断性生物标志物的发展。在不依赖特定连接变量的情况下,我们将重点放在一个一般假设上,即与其他大脑网络相比,在癫痫发作期间,EN经历了最大程度的连接变化。为了验证这一假设,我们开发了一种量化网络状态之间连通性变化的新方法,并将其应用于识别手术切除区域。网络状态由颅内脑电图记录在指定时间间隔内的随机连接快照表示。采用二值分类器对两种网络状态进行分类。通过交叉验证估计的分类器泛化性能被用作连通性变化的连续度量。该算法通过迭代增加节点来生成网络,直到连通性变化幅度减小。将得到的网络与手术切除进行比较,并使用重叠评分来预测术后结果。该框架在21例患者的连续队列中进行评估,术后随访至少3年。连接改变网络和切除之间的最佳重叠出现在癫痫发作前到癫痫发作的过渡阶段(手术结果预测ROC-AUC=90.3%)。然而,当考虑到信息量最大的时间间隔时,除1例患者外,所有患者都被正确分类。与癫痫发作时间成正比的时间间隔比几乎普遍使用的固定间隔更能提供信息。这项研究表明,连接可以通过机器学习分析成功分类,并为区分单独的癫痫功能网络提供信息。综上所述,连通性变化分析可以准确识别经手术结果分类验证的致痫网络。癫痫发作过渡期连通性变化幅度可能作为EN生物标志物。本研究提供的工具可能有助于手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
期刊最新文献
Task-specific temporal prediction mechanisms revealed by motor and electroencephalographic indicators. A novel way to use cross-validation to measure connectivity by machine learning allows epilepsy surgery outcome prediction. Cardiorespiratory dynamics in the brain: Review on the significance of cardiovascular and respiratory correlates in functional MRI signal. Fast EEG/MEG BEM-based forward problem solution for high-resolution head models. Local structural-functional coupling with counterfactual explanations for epilepsy prediction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1