The joint effects of inflammation and renal function status on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMC Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1186/s12883-024-04002-6
Zhichao Huang, Xiaoyue Zhu, Xiuman Xu, Yi Wang, Yafang Zhu, Dongqin Chen, Yongjun Cao, Xia Zhang
{"title":"The joint effects of inflammation and renal function status on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis.","authors":"Zhichao Huang, Xiaoyue Zhu, Xiuman Xu, Yi Wang, Yafang Zhu, Dongqin Chen, Yongjun Cao, Xia Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12883-024-04002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine the predictive value of renal function status [estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] in conjunction with inflammatory biomarkers [white blood cell(WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] for in-hospital outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively screened a total of 409 AIS patients treated with IVT. The study participants were classified into two groups according to post-stroke pneumonia or functional outcome. They were divided into four groups according to the cut-offs of inflammatory biomarkers and eGFR by receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curves for two outcomes of post-stroke pneumonia and functional status: WBC↓/eGFR↑, WBC↓/eGFR↓, WBC↑/eGFR↑, and WBC↑/eGFR↓for post-stroke pneumonia; and CRP↓/eGFR↑, CRP↓/eGFR↓, CRP↑/eGFR↑, and CRP↑/eGFR↓for functional outcome. Logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of post-stroke pneumonia or at-discharge functional outcome, using the WBC↓/eGFR↑group or CRP↓/eGFR↑group as the reference. The Net Reclassification Index (NRI) and the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) were calculated to analyze the combined predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with patients in WBC↓/eGFR↑group, those in WBC↑/eGFR↑group had increased risk of post-stroke pneumonia (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.67-15.87) and poor functional outcome (OR 5.95, 95% CI 2.25-15.74). Furthermore, patients in WBC↑/ eGFR↓group had the highest risk of clinical outcomes (all P value for trend < 0.001), the multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 7.04 (2.42-20.46) for post-stroke pneumonia and 8.64 (3.30-22.65) for poor functional outcome. The addition of WBC and eGFR to the basic model significantly improved risk prediction for post-stroke pneumonia (category-free NRI 69.0%, 95% CI 47.3%-90.7%; IDI 5.4%, 95% CI 2.6%-8.3%) and functional outcome (category-free NRI 59.4%, 95% CI 39.2%-79.9%; IDI 5.3%, 95% CI 2.9%-7.8%). Similarly, when we added CRP and eGFR to the basic model with conventional risk factors, the risk discrimination and prediction for post-stroke pneumonia and functional outcome was also significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining renal function status and inflammatory biomarkers within 4.5 h after onset could better predict in-hospital outcomes of AIS patients with IVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"24 1","pages":"493"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-04002-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to determine the predictive value of renal function status [estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)] in conjunction with inflammatory biomarkers [white blood cell(WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] for in-hospital outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

Methods: We retrospectively screened a total of 409 AIS patients treated with IVT. The study participants were classified into two groups according to post-stroke pneumonia or functional outcome. They were divided into four groups according to the cut-offs of inflammatory biomarkers and eGFR by receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curves for two outcomes of post-stroke pneumonia and functional status: WBC↓/eGFR↑, WBC↓/eGFR↓, WBC↑/eGFR↑, and WBC↑/eGFR↓for post-stroke pneumonia; and CRP↓/eGFR↑, CRP↓/eGFR↓, CRP↑/eGFR↑, and CRP↑/eGFR↓for functional outcome. Logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of post-stroke pneumonia or at-discharge functional outcome, using the WBC↓/eGFR↑group or CRP↓/eGFR↑group as the reference. The Net Reclassification Index (NRI) and the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) were calculated to analyze the combined predictive value.

Results: Compared with patients in WBC↓/eGFR↑group, those in WBC↑/eGFR↑group had increased risk of post-stroke pneumonia (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.67-15.87) and poor functional outcome (OR 5.95, 95% CI 2.25-15.74). Furthermore, patients in WBC↑/ eGFR↓group had the highest risk of clinical outcomes (all P value for trend < 0.001), the multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CIs) were 7.04 (2.42-20.46) for post-stroke pneumonia and 8.64 (3.30-22.65) for poor functional outcome. The addition of WBC and eGFR to the basic model significantly improved risk prediction for post-stroke pneumonia (category-free NRI 69.0%, 95% CI 47.3%-90.7%; IDI 5.4%, 95% CI 2.6%-8.3%) and functional outcome (category-free NRI 59.4%, 95% CI 39.2%-79.9%; IDI 5.3%, 95% CI 2.9%-7.8%). Similarly, when we added CRP and eGFR to the basic model with conventional risk factors, the risk discrimination and prediction for post-stroke pneumonia and functional outcome was also significantly improved.

Conclusion: Combining renal function status and inflammatory biomarkers within 4.5 h after onset could better predict in-hospital outcomes of AIS patients with IVT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗中炎症和肾功能状况对住院预后的共同影响
目的:我们旨在确定肾功能状态[估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)]结合炎症生物标志物[白细胞(WBC)和c反应蛋白(CRP)]对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者接受静脉溶栓(IVT)治疗的住院预后的预测价值。方法:回顾性筛选409例接受IVT治疗的AIS患者。研究参与者根据中风后肺炎或功能结果分为两组。根据炎症生物标志物和eGFR通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的截断值与脑卒中后肺炎的两种结局和功能状态分为四组:脑卒中后肺炎的WBC↓/eGFR↑、WBC↓/eGFR↓、WBC↑/eGFR↑和WBC↑/eGFR↓;CRP↓/eGFR↑、CRP↓/eGFR↓、CRP↑/eGFR↑和CRP↑/eGFR↓的功能结局。以WBC↓/eGFR↑组或CRP↓/eGFR↑组为参考,采用Logistic回归模型计算脑卒中后肺炎或出院时功能结局的优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。计算净重分类指数(NRI)和综合判别改善指数(IDI),分析其联合预测值。结果:与WBC↓/eGFR↑组相比,WBC↑/eGFR↑组卒中后肺炎风险增加(OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.67-15.87),功能预后差(OR 5.95, 95% CI 2.25-15.74)。WBC↑/ eGFR↓组患者临床转归风险最高(均为趋势P值)。结论:结合起病后4.5 h内的肾功能状态和炎症生物标志物可以更好地预测AIS合并IVT患者的院内转归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and functional outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy. Prediction of depression development in Parkinson's disease patients: a radiomics-based machine learning study. Development and validation of programmed cell death related genes in intracranial aneurysms. Recurrent cerebral venous thrombosis associated with IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis: Case report and literature review. Employment status and self-rated health in people with multiple sclerosis in Sweden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1