Integrating traditional biomarkers and emerging predictors to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer: a multifactorial analysis of Ki-67, CDK4, EGFR, TILs and ctDNA.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1186/s12905-024-03486-1
Tianzhao Du, Ye Yuan, Shulan Sun, Zhichao Gao, Xiaoshuai Li
{"title":"Integrating traditional biomarkers and emerging predictors to assess neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer: a multifactorial analysis of Ki-67, CDK4, EGFR, TILs and ctDNA.","authors":"Tianzhao Du, Ye Yuan, Shulan Sun, Zhichao Gao, Xiaoshuai Li","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03486-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the correlation between the expression of cell proliferation-associated antigen (Ki-67), cell cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with the outcome and prognosis of patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological data of 231 patients with BC who underwent preoperative NACT at XX Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. Logistic regression models were used to analyse factors influencing NACT efficacy. The Cox risk regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. The TILs were assessed on pre-treatment biopsies, and ctDNA levels were monitored during NACT. Propensity score matching and subgroup analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy, the response rate was 77.92% (180/231), with 58.87% (136/231) achieving pathological complete response (pCR). Multifactorial analysis showed that tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) stage II, EGFR positivity, low Ki-67 expression, CDK4 negativity, non-triple-negative subtypes and effective NACT results were associated with higher pCR rates. Higher TIL levels correlated with increased pCR rates (72.4% for high TILs vs 39.1% for low TILs, p < 0.001). The ctDNA levels decreased significantly in patients with pCR compared with patients without pCR during NACT (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the pCR group (88.9% vs 71.1%, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed varying pCR rates and predictive biomarkers across BC subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TNM classification, EGFR, Ki-67, CDK4 expression, BC subtype and NACT results have predictive value for pCR in patients with BC. Lower TNM classification, lower Ki-67 expression and EGFR positivity are associated with better outcomes. High TIL levels and significant decreases in ctDNA during NACT correlate with improved response and prognosis. These findings highlight the potential for integrating traditional clinicopathological factors with novel biomarkers for personalised treatment strategies in BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03486-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyse the correlation between the expression of cell proliferation-associated antigen (Ki-67), cell cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) with the outcome and prognosis of patients with breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological data of 231 patients with BC who underwent preoperative NACT at XX Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. Logistic regression models were used to analyse factors influencing NACT efficacy. The Cox risk regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. The TILs were assessed on pre-treatment biopsies, and ctDNA levels were monitored during NACT. Propensity score matching and subgroup analyses were performed.

Results: After 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy, the response rate was 77.92% (180/231), with 58.87% (136/231) achieving pathological complete response (pCR). Multifactorial analysis showed that tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) stage II, EGFR positivity, low Ki-67 expression, CDK4 negativity, non-triple-negative subtypes and effective NACT results were associated with higher pCR rates. Higher TIL levels correlated with increased pCR rates (72.4% for high TILs vs 39.1% for low TILs, p < 0.001). The ctDNA levels decreased significantly in patients with pCR compared with patients without pCR during NACT (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the pCR group (88.9% vs 71.1%, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed varying pCR rates and predictive biomarkers across BC subtypes.

Conclusion: The TNM classification, EGFR, Ki-67, CDK4 expression, BC subtype and NACT results have predictive value for pCR in patients with BC. Lower TNM classification, lower Ki-67 expression and EGFR positivity are associated with better outcomes. High TIL levels and significant decreases in ctDNA during NACT correlate with improved response and prognosis. These findings highlight the potential for integrating traditional clinicopathological factors with novel biomarkers for personalised treatment strategies in BC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合传统生物标志物和新兴预测因子评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效:Ki-67、CDK4、EGFR、TILs和ctDNA的多因素分析
研究目的本研究旨在分析细胞增殖相关抗原(Ki-67)、细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4(CDK4)、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)和循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的表达与接受新辅助化疗(NACT)的乳腺癌(BC)患者的疗效和预后之间的相关性:我们回顾性分析了2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在XX医院接受术前NACT的231例BC患者的临床病理数据。采用逻辑回归模型分析影响NACT疗效的因素。Cox风险回归模型用于分析预后因素。治疗前活检评估TIL,NACT期间监测ctDNA水平。进行倾向评分匹配和亚组分析:经过4-6个周期的化疗后,反应率为77.92%(180/231),其中58.87%(136/231)获得病理完全反应(pCR)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤、结节和转移(TNM)II期、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性、低Ki-67表达、CDK4阴性、非三阴亚型和有效的NACT结果与较高的pCR率相关。TIL水平越高,pCR率越高(高TIL为72.4%,低TIL为39.1%,P 结论:TIL水平越高,pCR率越高(高TIL为72.4%,低TIL为39.1%,P 结论):TNM分类、表皮生长因子受体、Ki-67、CDK4表达、BC亚型和NACT结果对BC患者的pCR具有预测价值。较低的TNM分级、较低的Ki-67表达和表皮生长因子受体阳性与较好的预后相关。高TIL水平和NACT期间ctDNA的显著下降与反应和预后的改善相关。这些研究结果凸显了将传统临床病理因素与新型生物标记物相结合,以制定BC个性化治疗策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between psychological empowerment, physical activity enjoyment, and response to a HIIT Program in physically inactive young women: a prospective multicentre study. Characterization of tumor prognosis and sensitive chemotherapy drugs based on cuproptosis-related gene signature in ovarian cancer. Mediation of the effect of prenatal maternal smoking on time to natural menopause in daughters by birthweight-for-gestational-age z-score and breastfeeding duration: analysis of two UK birth cohorts born in 1958 and 1970. The effect of waiting time on ovarian cancer survival in oncology centres, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Abortion and contraception within prison health care: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1