Assessing the Impact of Lymphedema Therapy Referral on Breast Cancer Survivors' Lymphedema Knowledge: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03654-x
Madelyn Klugman, Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Sujata Patil, Kathryn R Tringale, Giacomo Montagna, Jackie Finik, Ting-Ting Kuo, Carolyn Eberle, Alexandr Pinkhasov, Theresa Gillis, Francesca Gany, Victoria Blinder
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Lymphedema Therapy Referral on Breast Cancer Survivors' Lymphedema Knowledge: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Madelyn Klugman, Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Sujata Patil, Kathryn R Tringale, Giacomo Montagna, Jackie Finik, Ting-Ting Kuo, Carolyn Eberle, Alexandr Pinkhasov, Theresa Gillis, Francesca Gany, Victoria Blinder","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03654-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymphedema is a common problem that adversely impacts quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Although lymphedema risk is modifiable through behavior change, there is no standardized approach to educate survivors about risk-lowering strategies. Furthermore, misconceptions about lymphedema risk factors and risk-lowering strategies are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lymphedema therapy referral on knowledge about lymphedema risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional single institution study in which breast cancer survivors at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center completed an anonymous questionnaire between 2014 and 2015. Eligibility criteria were age ≥ 18, female sex, English-speaking, > 6 months post definitive breast cancer surgery, no cancer recurrence, and no prior or subsequent second cancer. The questionnaire included sociodemographic variables, clinical factors including prior lymphedema therapy referral, and 10 true/false questions assessing knowledge about lymphedema risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the relationship between prior lymphedema therapy referral and correctly answering questions about lymphedema risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 209 participants, 53 (25%) had been referred to lymphedema therapy. Those who had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy were less frequently referred to lymphedema therapy [15 (14%)] than those who had undergone axillary lymph node dissection [38 (39%)]. Five of the true/false questions had a correct response rate of < 80%. After controlling for age, race/ethnicity, education, type of axillary surgery, and receipt of radiation therapy, referral for lymphedema therapy was associated with correctly answering two questions about lymphedema: weight gain increases lymphedema risk [odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 3.63 (1.66-7.96)] and patients are recommended to exercise their arm on an airplane [2.65 (1.15-6.13)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misconceptions about lymphedema prevention and management are common among breast cancer survivors. Lymphedema therapy referral is a potential opportunity to debunk misunderstandings and educate at-risk patients regarding lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03654-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lymphedema is a common problem that adversely impacts quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Although lymphedema risk is modifiable through behavior change, there is no standardized approach to educate survivors about risk-lowering strategies. Furthermore, misconceptions about lymphedema risk factors and risk-lowering strategies are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lymphedema therapy referral on knowledge about lymphedema risk.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional single institution study in which breast cancer survivors at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center completed an anonymous questionnaire between 2014 and 2015. Eligibility criteria were age ≥ 18, female sex, English-speaking, > 6 months post definitive breast cancer surgery, no cancer recurrence, and no prior or subsequent second cancer. The questionnaire included sociodemographic variables, clinical factors including prior lymphedema therapy referral, and 10 true/false questions assessing knowledge about lymphedema risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the relationship between prior lymphedema therapy referral and correctly answering questions about lymphedema risk.

Results: Of 209 participants, 53 (25%) had been referred to lymphedema therapy. Those who had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy were less frequently referred to lymphedema therapy [15 (14%)] than those who had undergone axillary lymph node dissection [38 (39%)]. Five of the true/false questions had a correct response rate of < 80%. After controlling for age, race/ethnicity, education, type of axillary surgery, and receipt of radiation therapy, referral for lymphedema therapy was associated with correctly answering two questions about lymphedema: weight gain increases lymphedema risk [odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 3.63 (1.66-7.96)] and patients are recommended to exercise their arm on an airplane [2.65 (1.15-6.13)].

Conclusions: Misconceptions about lymphedema prevention and management are common among breast cancer survivors. Lymphedema therapy referral is a potential opportunity to debunk misunderstandings and educate at-risk patients regarding lymphedema.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估淋巴水肿治疗转诊对乳腺癌幸存者淋巴水肿知识的影响:一项横断面调查。
背景:淋巴水肿是影响乳腺癌幸存者生活质量的常见问题。虽然淋巴水肿的风险可以通过行为改变来改变,但没有标准化的方法来教育幸存者降低风险的策略。此外,误解淋巴水肿的危险因素和降低风险的策略是常见的。本研究的目的是评估淋巴水肿治疗转诊对淋巴水肿风险认知的影响。方法:这是一项横断面单机构研究,在2014年至2015年期间,美国国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心的乳腺癌幸存者完成了一份匿名问卷。入选标准为年龄≥18岁,女性,会说英语,乳腺癌手术后6个月以上,无肿瘤复发,既往或随后无第二次肿瘤。问卷包括社会人口学变量、临床因素(包括既往淋巴水肿治疗转诊)和评估淋巴水肿风险知识的10个真假问题。多变量logistic回归分析评估了既往淋巴水肿治疗转诊与正确回答有关淋巴水肿风险的问题之间的关系。结果:209名参与者中,53名(25%)接受了淋巴水肿治疗。接受前哨淋巴结活检的患者接受淋巴水肿治疗的频率低于接受腋窝淋巴结清扫的患者[15例(14%)][38例(39%)]。结论:乳腺癌幸存者对淋巴水肿的预防和管理存在普遍的误解。淋巴水肿治疗转诊是一个潜在的机会,揭穿误解和教育有风险的患者关于淋巴水肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
期刊最新文献
Cervicovaginal lavage fluid iron and manganese levels in women with and without vaginitis. Evaluation of Girls Invest, an economic empowerment intervention to address social and economic risks associated with intimate partner violence among adolescent girls in Ibadan, Nigeria. Effects of concurrent training on body composition, metabolic, and inflammatory in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Knowledge and skills on emergency contraceptive pills among day-scholar female adolescents aged 13-19 in Nyarugenge, Kigali-Rwanda: a cross-sectional study. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening uptake among women aged 30-49 years of Bhanu Municipality, Tanahun, Nepal: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1