Validation of the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for children with mental disorders in specialized health-care services.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1415133
Lina Díaz-Castro, Miriam Arroyo-Belmonte, Paloma Suárez-Brito, María Elena Márquez-Caraveo, Consuelo Garcia-Andrade
{"title":"Validation of the World Health Organization's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for children with mental disorders in specialized health-care services.","authors":"Lina Díaz-Castro, Miriam Arroyo-Belmonte, Paloma Suárez-Brito, María Elena Márquez-Caraveo, Consuelo Garcia-Andrade","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1415133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental disorders are highly prevalent among children, yet access to timely and effective treatment remains limited. Untreated or poorly managed mental disorders in children are associated with significant functional deterioration and long-term consequences. The validation of reliable assessment tools is crucial for identifying functional impairments and guiding interventions in this population. This study aimed to assess the utility and psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in evaluating functional impairment among children and adolescents receiving specialized mental health care in Mexican psychiatric hospitals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from January 2018 to February 2020 in two psychiatric public hospitals in Mexico. The Spanish version of the WHODAS 2.0 was adapted for the pediatric population, and its psychometric properties were evaluated among 390 children and adolescents receiving psychiatric care. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and tests of internal consistency and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .92) and convergent validity, with significant correlations observed between WHODAS scores and clinical variables. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-dimensional structure, with gender-specific differences identified in functional impairment patterns.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study provides robust evidence supporting the utility and psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing functional impairment in children and adolescents with mental disorders in Mexican psychiatric hospitals. These findings have implications for clinical practice, policy-making, and future research aimed at improving outcomes for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1415133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1415133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mental disorders are highly prevalent among children, yet access to timely and effective treatment remains limited. Untreated or poorly managed mental disorders in children are associated with significant functional deterioration and long-term consequences. The validation of reliable assessment tools is crucial for identifying functional impairments and guiding interventions in this population. This study aimed to assess the utility and psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in evaluating functional impairment among children and adolescents receiving specialized mental health care in Mexican psychiatric hospitals.

Method: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from January 2018 to February 2020 in two psychiatric public hospitals in Mexico. The Spanish version of the WHODAS 2.0 was adapted for the pediatric population, and its psychometric properties were evaluated among 390 children and adolescents receiving psychiatric care. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and tests of internal consistency and validity.

Results: The WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .92) and convergent validity, with significant correlations observed between WHODAS scores and clinical variables. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-dimensional structure, with gender-specific differences identified in functional impairment patterns.

Discussion: The study provides robust evidence supporting the utility and psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing functional impairment in children and adolescents with mental disorders in Mexican psychiatric hospitals. These findings have implications for clinical practice, policy-making, and future research aimed at improving outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确认世界卫生组织关于在专门保健服务中患有精神障碍的儿童的残疾评估表2.0。
精神障碍在儿童中非常普遍,但获得及时和有效治疗的机会仍然有限。未经治疗或管理不善的儿童精神障碍与严重的功能恶化和长期后果有关。验证可靠的评估工具对于识别这一人群的功能障碍和指导干预至关重要。本研究旨在评估世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)在评估墨西哥精神病院接受专门精神卫生保健的儿童和青少年的功能障碍方面的效用和心理测量学特性。方法:2018年1月至2020年2月在墨西哥两家精神科公立医院进行横断面分析研究。西班牙语版WHODAS 2.0适用于儿科人群,并对390名接受精神科治疗的儿童和青少年进行心理测量特性评估。数据分析采用描述性统计、探索性和验证性因素分析,以及内部一致性和效度检验。结果:WHODAS 2.0具有较高的内部一致性(α = 0.92)和收敛效度,WHODAS评分与临床变量之间存在显著相关。探索性因子分析揭示了一个六维结构,在功能损伤模式中具有性别特异性差异。讨论:该研究提供了强有力的证据,支持WHODAS 2.0在评估墨西哥精神病院患有精神障碍的儿童和青少年的功能障碍方面的效用和心理测量学特性。这些发现对临床实践、政策制定和未来旨在改善这一弱势群体结果的研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Correction: A unique case of food restriction and OCD diagnosed as PANDAS and a review of the literature. Ketamine as an NMDA-modulating therapy in bipolar disorder: rationale and evidence. Dropout rates and factors associated with adherence to opioid agonist treatment among adults with opioid use disorder at Sekou Toure Regional Referral Hospital, Mwanza, Tanzania. Decreased hippocampal neurogenesis and post-stroke depression. Leveraging point-of-view camera and MediaPipe for objective hyperactivity assessment in preschool ADHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1