Factors associated with cognitive flexibility in people with opioid-use disorder: a pilot study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1505391
Paul S Regier, Thais Costa Macedo de Arruda, Laura Sinko, Anne M Teitelman, Anna Rose Childress
{"title":"Factors associated with cognitive flexibility in people with opioid-use disorder: a pilot study.","authors":"Paul S Regier, Thais Costa Macedo de Arruda, Laura Sinko, Anne M Teitelman, Anna Rose Childress","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1505391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to adapt to changing circumstances has strong survival value. Individuals with substance use disorders tend to get \"stuck\" over-responding to drug-reward signals and pursuing drugs despite negative consequences. A lack of flexibility may be tied to impairments in neurocognition, including learning, memory, and executive function. However, results are often mixed, potentially due to heterogeneity in factors such as mental health, personality traits, or prior adversity. This study aimed to identify which factors influence neurocognitive variations within the opioid use disorder (OUD) population. Based on prior literature, we hypothesized that individuals with OUD would show deficits (vs. controls) in one or more neurocognitive domains, and that these cognitive difficulties might be greater in individuals with other known contributors to impaired cognition. This pilot project included 32 individuals receiving medication for OUD and 15 non-substance using controls (NSC). Questionnaires assessed addiction and relapse risk factors, such as impulsiveness, social function, depressive symptoms, and childhood adversity. Neurocognitive performance was measured via the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (P-CNB), including tasks that probe attention, working memory, episodic memory, cognitive flexibility, and complex cognition, and was compared between the OUD and NSC groups. OUD participants (vs. NSCs) exhibited significantly lower performance on the conditional exclusion task (CET) (Accuracy: 1.11 vs. 2.38, p < 0.001) and the n-Back task (NBT) (F1 Scores: 83% vs. 95%, p < 0.001). Impulsiveness, social function, and depressive symptoms were highly inter-related; however, only higher impulsiveness (r = -.48, p = 0.006) and more social impairment (r = -.47, p = 0.007) significantly correlated with decreased CET (but not n-Back) performance. This pilot study suggests that working memory and cognitive flexibility are impaired in people with OUD and that impulsiveness and social function are key factors in cognitive flexibility impairments in people with OUD. These results may offer insights for larger-scale investigations and potential interventions to reduce relapse risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1505391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1505391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to adapt to changing circumstances has strong survival value. Individuals with substance use disorders tend to get "stuck" over-responding to drug-reward signals and pursuing drugs despite negative consequences. A lack of flexibility may be tied to impairments in neurocognition, including learning, memory, and executive function. However, results are often mixed, potentially due to heterogeneity in factors such as mental health, personality traits, or prior adversity. This study aimed to identify which factors influence neurocognitive variations within the opioid use disorder (OUD) population. Based on prior literature, we hypothesized that individuals with OUD would show deficits (vs. controls) in one or more neurocognitive domains, and that these cognitive difficulties might be greater in individuals with other known contributors to impaired cognition. This pilot project included 32 individuals receiving medication for OUD and 15 non-substance using controls (NSC). Questionnaires assessed addiction and relapse risk factors, such as impulsiveness, social function, depressive symptoms, and childhood adversity. Neurocognitive performance was measured via the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (P-CNB), including tasks that probe attention, working memory, episodic memory, cognitive flexibility, and complex cognition, and was compared between the OUD and NSC groups. OUD participants (vs. NSCs) exhibited significantly lower performance on the conditional exclusion task (CET) (Accuracy: 1.11 vs. 2.38, p < 0.001) and the n-Back task (NBT) (F1 Scores: 83% vs. 95%, p < 0.001). Impulsiveness, social function, and depressive symptoms were highly inter-related; however, only higher impulsiveness (r = -.48, p = 0.006) and more social impairment (r = -.47, p = 0.007) significantly correlated with decreased CET (but not n-Back) performance. This pilot study suggests that working memory and cognitive flexibility are impaired in people with OUD and that impulsiveness and social function are key factors in cognitive flexibility impairments in people with OUD. These results may offer insights for larger-scale investigations and potential interventions to reduce relapse risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物使用障碍患者认知灵活性相关因素:一项初步研究
适应变化环境的能力具有很强的生存价值。有药物使用障碍的人往往会对药物奖励信号反应过度,不顾负面后果地追求药物。缺乏灵活性可能与神经认知障碍有关,包括学习、记忆和执行功能。然而,结果往往是喜忧参半的,这可能是由于心理健康、人格特征或先前的逆境等因素的异质性。本研究旨在确定影响阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)人群神经认知变化的因素。基于先前的文献,我们假设OUD患者会在一个或多个神经认知领域表现出缺陷(与对照组相比),并且这些认知困难可能在其他已知认知受损因素的个体中更大。该试点项目包括32名接受OUD药物治疗的个人和15名非物质使用对照组(NSC)。问卷评估成瘾和复发的风险因素,如冲动、社会功能、抑郁症状和童年逆境。通过Penn计算机化神经认知电池(P-CNB)测量神经认知表现,包括探测注意力、工作记忆、情景记忆、认知灵活性和复杂认知的任务,并比较OUD组和NSC组之间的差异。OUD参与者(与NSCs相比)在条件排除任务(CET)(准确率:1.11对2.38,p < 0.001)和n-Back任务(F1分数:83%对95%,p < 0.001)上的表现明显较低。冲动性、社会功能和抑郁症状高度相关;然而,只有较高的冲动性(r = -)。48, p = 0.006)和更多的社会障碍(r = -。47, p = 0.007)与CET成绩下降显著相关(但与n-Back成绩无关)。本初步研究表明,OUD患者的工作记忆和认知灵活性受损,冲动和社会功能是OUD患者认知灵活性受损的关键因素。这些结果可能为更大规模的调查和潜在的干预措施提供见解,以减少复发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Changes in regional homogeneity of the social brain in individuals with autism spectrum disorder after social skills training. (COVID-19) SARS-CoV-2-catatonia syndrome: does it exist? Longitudinal evidence. Childhood adversity and sex trafficking experiences linked to economic and psychological outcomes for U.S. survivors of commercial sexual exploitation. Perceive-Assess-Dose-Safeguard: a safety-gated state-action grammar for psychotherapy micro-decisions in computational psychiatry. Comprehensive intervention for reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a study of Internet-delivered and offline dialectical behavior therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1