Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.22037/uj.v21i.8459
MohmmadAmin Omrani, Abbas Basiri, Mehran Rahimlou
{"title":"Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"MohmmadAmin Omrani, Abbas Basiri, Mehran Rahimlou","doi":"10.22037/uj.v21i.8459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Positive surgical margins (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a concern due to potential implications for recurrence and survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of PSM on recurrence rates and progression-free survival in RCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception through July 2024. Studies examining recurrence and survival outcomes in RCC patients with and without PSM post-PN were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed that PSM was significantly associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67-2.72) and a lower recurrence/progression-free survival (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.40-2.07) compared to negative surgical margins. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent results across study designs and RCC histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of PSM following PN for RCC is associated with a 2.13-fold increase in local recurrence and a 1.7-fold reduction in progression-free survival, emphasizing the need for precise margin management during surgery. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing surgical techniques and considering adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with PSM to improve oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Positive surgical margins (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a concern due to potential implications for recurrence and survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of PSM on recurrence rates and progression-free survival in RCC patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception through July 2024. Studies examining recurrence and survival outcomes in RCC patients with and without PSM post-PN were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrence and survival.

Results: Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed that PSM was significantly associated with a higher risk of local recurrence (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.67-2.72) and a lower recurrence/progression-free survival (HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.40-2.07) compared to negative surgical margins. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent results across study designs and RCC histologic subtypes.

Conclusion: The presence of PSM following PN for RCC is associated with a 2.13-fold increase in local recurrence and a 1.7-fold reduction in progression-free survival, emphasizing the need for precise margin management during surgery. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing surgical techniques and considering adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with PSM to improve oncologic outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Bladder health in U.S. Shift Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study (NHANES). Effect of 3D Modeling of S-fusion Software on Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Underwent Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study. Erectile Dysfunction and Ejaculatory Dysfunction in Covid-19 Recovered Patient: Temporary or Persistent? Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. A Comprehensive Review of the Complete Primary Repair Technique for Bladder-Exstrophy-Epispadias Reconstruction: First Surgical Attempt Should Be the Best One.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1