Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): A cross-sectional study from Syria.

K A Khalil, M Alsultan, N A Daher
{"title":"Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): A cross-sectional study from Syria.","authors":"K A Khalil, M Alsultan, N A Daher","doi":"10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial profile and their antibiotic spectrum in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and investigate the risk factors for VAP and the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was included 105 patients with clinically suspected VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) of two university hospitals from Syria, between January 2023 and February 2024. Culture-positive included 69 samples (65.7%), which were classified based on post-intubation as early-onset (<5 days) or late-onset (≥5 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 82.6% and 17.4%; respectively. Early and late-onset VAP was reported in 30 (43.5%) and 39 (56.5%) patients; respectively. The primary cause of early-onset VAP was Acinetobacter and Enterobacter , whereas Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the main causes of late-onset VAP. Gram-negative showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolones (91.2%), carbapenems (78.9% for imipenem and 86% for meropenem), and amikacin (83.2%), while all were sensitive to colistin. Gram-positive was sensitive to tetracycline, vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MDR was observed in 55 patients (79.7%) and in early (76.9%) and late-onset (83.3%) VAP. There were no risk factors favoring MDR or early compared to late-onset VAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed a high prevalence of Gram-negative among VAP patients. A significant prevalence of MDR pathogens was observed in early and late-onset VAP, along with high resistance to carbapenems. This necessitates a reassessment of the current use of antibiotics and highlights the need for further studies to choose alternative treatments for empirical antibiotic coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the bacterial profile and their antibiotic spectrum in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and investigate the risk factors for VAP and the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was included 105 patients with clinically suspected VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) of two university hospitals from Syria, between January 2023 and February 2024. Culture-positive included 69 samples (65.7%), which were classified based on post-intubation as early-onset (<5 days) or late-onset (≥5 days).

Results: Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 82.6% and 17.4%; respectively. Early and late-onset VAP was reported in 30 (43.5%) and 39 (56.5%) patients; respectively. The primary cause of early-onset VAP was Acinetobacter and Enterobacter , whereas Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the main causes of late-onset VAP. Gram-negative showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolones (91.2%), carbapenems (78.9% for imipenem and 86% for meropenem), and amikacin (83.2%), while all were sensitive to colistin. Gram-positive was sensitive to tetracycline, vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MDR was observed in 55 patients (79.7%) and in early (76.9%) and late-onset (83.3%) VAP. There were no risk factors favoring MDR or early compared to late-onset VAP.

Conclusions: The study revealed a high prevalence of Gram-negative among VAP patients. A significant prevalence of MDR pathogens was observed in early and late-onset VAP, along with high resistance to carbapenems. This necessitates a reassessment of the current use of antibiotics and highlights the need for further studies to choose alternative treatments for empirical antibiotic coverage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的微生物特征和抗菌素耐药性模式:来自叙利亚的横断面研究。
前言:本研究旨在确定呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者的细菌谱及其抗生素谱,并探讨VAP的危险因素和多药耐药(MDR)病原体的存在。材料和方法:横断面研究纳入了叙利亚两所大学医院重症监护病房(icu)的105例临床疑似VAP患者,时间为2023年1月至2024年2月。培养阳性69例(65.7%),根据插管后分类为早发性(结果:革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌分别占82.6%和17.4%;分别。早发性和晚发性VAP分别为30例(43.5%)和39例(56.5%);分别。早发型VAP的主要病因是不动杆菌和肠杆菌,而迟发性VAP的主要病因是克雷伯菌和不动杆菌。革兰氏阴性对氟喹诺酮类(91.2%)、碳青霉烯类(亚胺培南78.9%、美罗培南86%)、阿米卡星(83.2%)耐药较高,对粘菌素均敏感。革兰氏阳性对四环素、万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑敏感。55例(79.7%)、早期(76.9%)和迟发性VAP(83.3%)出现多药耐药。与晚发性VAP相比,耐多药或早发性VAP没有风险因素。结论:该研究揭示了VAP患者中革兰氏阴性的高患病率。在早期和晚发性VAP中观察到耐多药病原体的显著患病率,同时对碳青霉烯类具有高耐药性。这需要对目前抗生素的使用进行重新评估,并强调需要进一步研究,以选择替代治疗的经验抗生素覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): A cross-sectional study from Syria. Challenges in implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) in developing countries. Revealing inducible clindamycin resistance in methicillin-resistant S aureus : A vital diagnostic imperative for effective treatment. Left ventricular pacing in a young African patient with a metallic tricuspid valve and infected epicardial leads: A case report. Pancreatic signet-ring cell carcinoma (the rare) with urinary bladder metastasis (the rarer).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1