Deep Learning-Based Post-Stroke Myoelectric Gesture Recognition: From Feature Construction to Network Design

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3521583
Tianzhe Bao;Zhiyuan Lu;Ping Zhou
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Post-Stroke Myoelectric Gesture Recognition: From Feature Construction to Network Design","authors":"Tianzhe Bao;Zhiyuan Lu;Ping Zhou","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3521583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, robot-assisted rehabilitation has emerged as a promising solution to increase the training intensity of stroke patients while reducing workload on therapists, whilst surface electromyography (sEMG) is expected to serve as a viable control source. In this paper, we delve into the potential of deep learning (DL) for post-stroke hand gesture recognition by collecting the sEMG signals of eight chronic stroke subjects, focusing on three primary aspects: feature domains of sEMG (time, frequency, and wavelet), data structures (one or two-dimensional images), and neural network architectures (CNN, CNN-LSTM, and CNN-LSTM-Attention). A total of 18 DL models were comprehensively evaluated in both intra-subject testing and inter-subject transfer learning tasks, with two post-processing algorithms (Model Voting and Bayesian Fusion) analysed subsequently. Experiment results infer that for intra-subject testing, the average accuracy of CNN-LSTM using two-dimensional frequency features is the highest, reaching 72.95%. For inter-subject transfer learning, the average accuracy of CNN-LSTM-Attention using one-dimensional frequency features is the highest, reaching 68.38%. Through these two experiments, it was found that frequency features had significant advantages over other features in gesture recognition after stroke. Moreover, the post-processing algorithm can further improve the recognition accuracy, and the recognition effect can be increased by 2.03% through the model voting algorithm.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10812756","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10812756/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, robot-assisted rehabilitation has emerged as a promising solution to increase the training intensity of stroke patients while reducing workload on therapists, whilst surface electromyography (sEMG) is expected to serve as a viable control source. In this paper, we delve into the potential of deep learning (DL) for post-stroke hand gesture recognition by collecting the sEMG signals of eight chronic stroke subjects, focusing on three primary aspects: feature domains of sEMG (time, frequency, and wavelet), data structures (one or two-dimensional images), and neural network architectures (CNN, CNN-LSTM, and CNN-LSTM-Attention). A total of 18 DL models were comprehensively evaluated in both intra-subject testing and inter-subject transfer learning tasks, with two post-processing algorithms (Model Voting and Bayesian Fusion) analysed subsequently. Experiment results infer that for intra-subject testing, the average accuracy of CNN-LSTM using two-dimensional frequency features is the highest, reaching 72.95%. For inter-subject transfer learning, the average accuracy of CNN-LSTM-Attention using one-dimensional frequency features is the highest, reaching 68.38%. Through these two experiments, it was found that frequency features had significant advantages over other features in gesture recognition after stroke. Moreover, the post-processing algorithm can further improve the recognition accuracy, and the recognition effect can be increased by 2.03% through the model voting algorithm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的卒中后肌电手势识别:从特征构建到网络设计
最近,机器人辅助康复已经成为一种有希望的解决方案,可以增加中风患者的训练强度,同时减少治疗师的工作量,而表面肌电图(sEMG)有望成为一种可行的控制来源。在本文中,我们通过收集8名慢性中风受试者的表面肌电信号,深入研究了深度学习(DL)在中风后手势识别中的潜力,重点关注三个主要方面:表面肌电信号的特征域(时间、频率和小波)、数据结构(一维或二维图像)和神经网络架构(CNN、CNN- lstm和CNN- lstm - attention)。在主题内测试和主题间迁移学习任务中,对18个DL模型进行了综合评估,随后分析了两种后处理算法(模型投票和贝叶斯融合)。实验结果表明,在受试者内测试中,使用二维频率特征的CNN-LSTM的平均准确率最高,达到72.95%。对于跨主题迁移学习,使用一维频率特征的CNN-LSTM-Attention平均正确率最高,达到68.38%。通过这两个实验,我们发现频率特征在中风后的手势识别中比其他特征具有显著的优势。此外,后处理算法可以进一步提高识别精度,通过模型投票算法,识别效果可提高2.03%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Manual Wheelchair Propulsion: Incremental Assistance Levels of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assist Proportionally Reduce Physiological and Biomechanical Demands in Able-Bodied Participants. Improving Acceptance to Sensory Substitution: A study on the V2A-SS Learning Model based on Information Processing Learning Theory. The More, the Better? Evaluating the Role of EEG Preprocessing for Deep Learning Applications Locomotion Joint Angle and Moment Estimation With Soft Wearable Sensors for Personalized Exosuit Control LAST-PAIN: Learning Adaptive Spike Thresholds for Low Back Pain Biosignals Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1