Jicheng Qian, Huilin Wang, Hailei Liang, Yuting Zheng, Mingyang Yu, Wing Ting Tse, Angel Hoi Wan Kwan, Lo Wong, Natalie Kwun Long Wong, Isabella Yi Man Wah, So Ling Lau, Shuk Yi Annie Hui, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau, Xiaoyan Chen, Rui Zhang, Liona C Poon, Tak Yeung Leung, Pengfei Liu, Kwong Wai Choy, Zirui Dong
{"title":"Mate-Pair Sequencing Enables Identification and Delineation of Balanced and Unbalanced Structural Variants in Prenatal Cytogenomic Diagnostics.","authors":"Jicheng Qian, Huilin Wang, Hailei Liang, Yuting Zheng, Mingyang Yu, Wing Ting Tse, Angel Hoi Wan Kwan, Lo Wong, Natalie Kwun Long Wong, Isabella Yi Man Wah, So Ling Lau, Shuk Yi Annie Hui, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau, Xiaoyan Chen, Rui Zhang, Liona C Poon, Tak Yeung Leung, Pengfei Liu, Kwong Wai Choy, Zirui Dong","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mate-pair sequencing detects both balanced and unbalanced structural variants (SVs) and simultaneously informs in relation to both genomic location and orientation of SVs for enhanced variant classification and clinical interpretation, while chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) only reports deletion/duplication. Herein, we evaluated its diagnostic utility in a prospective back-to-back prenatal comparative study with CMA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2021 to September 2023, 426 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies were prospectively recruited for mate-pair sequencing and CMA in parallel for prenatal genetic diagnosis. Balanced/unbalanced SVs and regions with absence of heterozygosity (AOH) were detected and classified independently, and comparisons were made between mate-pair sequencing and CMA to assess concordance. In addition, novel SVs were investigated for potential RNA perturbations using cultured cells, whenever available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mate-pair sequencing and CMA successfully yielded results for all 426 fetuses without the need for cell culturing. In addition, mate-pair sequencing identified 19 cases with aneuploidies, 16 cases with pathogenic simple deletions/duplications, and 5 cases with pathogenic translocations/insertions, providing a 25% incremental diagnostic yield compared to CMA (9.4%, 40/426 vs 7.6%, 32/426). Furthermore, by identifying the location and orientation of SVs, mate-pair sequencing improved the variant interpretation and/or follow-up approach for 40.0% (12) of the 30 cases with likely clinically significant deletions/duplications reported by CMA. Lastly, both platforms reported 3 cases (3/426) with multiple regions of AOH likely attributable to parental consanguinity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mate-pair sequencing detects additional balanced/unbalanced SVs and improves variant interpretation in comparison to CMA, indicating its potential to serve as a comprehensive prenatal cytogenomic diagnostic method.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"71 1","pages":"155-168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mate-pair sequencing detects both balanced and unbalanced structural variants (SVs) and simultaneously informs in relation to both genomic location and orientation of SVs for enhanced variant classification and clinical interpretation, while chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) only reports deletion/duplication. Herein, we evaluated its diagnostic utility in a prospective back-to-back prenatal comparative study with CMA.
Methods: From October 2021 to September 2023, 426 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies were prospectively recruited for mate-pair sequencing and CMA in parallel for prenatal genetic diagnosis. Balanced/unbalanced SVs and regions with absence of heterozygosity (AOH) were detected and classified independently, and comparisons were made between mate-pair sequencing and CMA to assess concordance. In addition, novel SVs were investigated for potential RNA perturbations using cultured cells, whenever available.
Results: Mate-pair sequencing and CMA successfully yielded results for all 426 fetuses without the need for cell culturing. In addition, mate-pair sequencing identified 19 cases with aneuploidies, 16 cases with pathogenic simple deletions/duplications, and 5 cases with pathogenic translocations/insertions, providing a 25% incremental diagnostic yield compared to CMA (9.4%, 40/426 vs 7.6%, 32/426). Furthermore, by identifying the location and orientation of SVs, mate-pair sequencing improved the variant interpretation and/or follow-up approach for 40.0% (12) of the 30 cases with likely clinically significant deletions/duplications reported by CMA. Lastly, both platforms reported 3 cases (3/426) with multiple regions of AOH likely attributable to parental consanguinity.
Conclusions: Mate-pair sequencing detects additional balanced/unbalanced SVs and improves variant interpretation in comparison to CMA, indicating its potential to serve as a comprehensive prenatal cytogenomic diagnostic method.
背景:配对测序检测平衡和不平衡结构变异(SVs),同时告知SVs的基因组位置和方向,以增强变异分类和临床解释,而染色体微阵列分析(CMA)仅报告缺失/重复。在此,我们评估其诊断效用在前瞻性背靠背产前比较研究与CMA。方法:从2021年10月至2023年9月,前瞻性招募426例超声异常胎儿进行配对测序和CMA并行产前遗传诊断。独立检测平衡/不平衡SVs和缺乏杂合性(AOH)区域,并将配对测序与CMA进行比较以评估一致性。此外,在可用的情况下,利用培养细胞研究了新型sv的潜在RNA扰动。结果:配偶对测序和CMA在不需要细胞培养的情况下成功地获得了所有426个胎儿的结果。此外,配对测序鉴定出19例非整倍体,16例致病性简单缺失/重复,5例致病性易位/插入,与CMA相比,诊断率增加了25% (9.4%,40/426 vs 7.6%, 32/426)。此外,通过确定sv的位置和取向,配对测序改善了CMA报告的30例可能存在临床显著缺失/重复的病例中40.0%(12例)的变异解释和/或随访方法。最后,两个平台都报告了3例(3/426)可能归因于父母血缘关系的AOH的多个区域。结论:与CMA相比,配偶对测序检测到额外的平衡/不平衡sv,并改善了变异解释,表明其有潜力作为全面的产前细胞基因组诊断方法。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.