Developing Benchmarking Metrics for Appropriate Ordering of Vitamin D, Thyroid Testing, and Iron Workups.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae126
Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Alec Saitman, Jane Dickerson
{"title":"Developing Benchmarking Metrics for Appropriate Ordering of Vitamin D, Thyroid Testing, and Iron Workups.","authors":"Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Alec Saitman, Jane Dickerson","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory stewardship programs are increasingly adopted to enhance test utilization and improve patient care. Despite their potential, implementation within complex healthcare systems remains challenging. Benchmarking metrics helps institutions compare their performance against peers or best practices. However, the application in laboratory stewardship is underrepresented in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PLUGS (Patient-centered Laboratory Utiliazation Guidance Services) Informatics Working Group developed guidelines to address common test utilization issues. Metrics were based on data that are easily retrievable and calculable. Three key benchmarks were chosen for a pilot study: the ratio of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D test orders, the ratio of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) to free thyroxine (FT4) test orders, and the percentage of iron workup orders after an initial low mean corpuscular volume (MCV). Institutions analyzed their own data and we established optimal benchmarks through inter-laboratory comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine laboratories evaluated vitamin D testing, with 2 implementing stewardship interventions beforehand. A benchmark of 50:1 was established, where a higher ratio indicates intentional ordering of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Nine laboratories evaluated thyroid testing, with 3 implementing interventions. The benchmark of 3.5:1 was established, with a higher ratio suggesting judicious TSH ordering. Seven laboratories evaluated iron workups, proposing a benchmark of 50% as a starting metric. Intervention guidelines were provided for laboratories below the benchmarks to promote improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Benchmarking metrics provide a standardized framework for assessing and enhancing test utilization practices across multiple laboratories. Continued collaboration and refinement of benchmarking methodologies is essential in maximizing the impact of laboratory stewardship programs on patient safety and resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory stewardship programs are increasingly adopted to enhance test utilization and improve patient care. Despite their potential, implementation within complex healthcare systems remains challenging. Benchmarking metrics helps institutions compare their performance against peers or best practices. However, the application in laboratory stewardship is underrepresented in the literature.

Methods: The PLUGS (Patient-centered Laboratory Utiliazation Guidance Services) Informatics Working Group developed guidelines to address common test utilization issues. Metrics were based on data that are easily retrievable and calculable. Three key benchmarks were chosen for a pilot study: the ratio of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D test orders, the ratio of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) to free thyroxine (FT4) test orders, and the percentage of iron workup orders after an initial low mean corpuscular volume (MCV). Institutions analyzed their own data and we established optimal benchmarks through inter-laboratory comparisons.

Results: Nine laboratories evaluated vitamin D testing, with 2 implementing stewardship interventions beforehand. A benchmark of 50:1 was established, where a higher ratio indicates intentional ordering of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. Nine laboratories evaluated thyroid testing, with 3 implementing interventions. The benchmark of 3.5:1 was established, with a higher ratio suggesting judicious TSH ordering. Seven laboratories evaluated iron workups, proposing a benchmark of 50% as a starting metric. Intervention guidelines were provided for laboratories below the benchmarks to promote improvement.

Conclusions: Benchmarking metrics provide a standardized framework for assessing and enhancing test utilization practices across multiple laboratories. Continued collaboration and refinement of benchmarking methodologies is essential in maximizing the impact of laboratory stewardship programs on patient safety and resource utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为维生素D、甲状腺检查和铁检查的适当排序制定基准指标。
背景:实验室管理计划越来越多地被采用,以提高测试利用率和改善患者护理。尽管它们具有潜力,但在复杂的医疗保健系统中实施仍然具有挑战性。基准度量有助于机构将其绩效与同行或最佳实践进行比较。然而,在实验室管理的应用是在文献中代表性不足。方法:插头(以患者为中心的实验室利用指导服务)信息学工作组制定了解决常见测试使用问题的指南。度量标准是基于易于检索和计算的数据。选择了三个关键基准作为试点研究:25-羟基维生素D与1,25-二羟基维生素D测试订单的比例,促甲状腺激素(TSH)与游离甲状腺素(FT4)测试订单的比例,以及初始低平均红细胞体积(MCV)后铁检查订单的百分比。机构分析了他们自己的数据,我们通过实验室间的比较建立了最佳基准。结果:9个实验室对维生素D检测进行评估,其中2个实验室事先实施了管理干预。建立了50:1的基准,其中较高的比例表明有意订购1,25-二羟基维生素d。9个实验室评估甲状腺测试,3个实施干预措施。建立了3.5:1的基准,比值越高说明TSH排序越明智。七个实验室评估了铁检查,提出了50%的基准作为起始指标。为低于基准的化验室提供干预指引,以促进改善。结论:基准度量为评估和增强跨多个实验室的测试利用实践提供了一个标准化的框架。在实验室管理项目对患者安全和资源利用的影响最大化方面,持续合作和改进基准方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Cardiac Troponin T High Sensitivity Gen 6 Assay. Potassium Reference Intervals: A Need for Separate Reference Intervals for Serum and Plasma. Commentary on Delayed Diagnosis of a Rare Metabolic Disorder in Adulthood. Delayed Diagnosis of a Rare Metabolic Disorder in Adulthood. GFAP/UCH-L1 Assay for mTBI: Preanalytical Factors and Levels in Healthy Individuals-A Study on Danish Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1