Increasing the Diagnostic Utility of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) Testing: An Academic Medical Center's Utilization Analysis and Intervention.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae131
Meredith G Parsons, Ryan A Hobbs, Julie Schmidt, Anna E Merrill
{"title":"Increasing the Diagnostic Utility of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) Testing: An Academic Medical Center's Utilization Analysis and Intervention.","authors":"Meredith G Parsons, Ryan A Hobbs, Julie Schmidt, Anna E Merrill","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction with numerous diagnostic challenges. Diagnosis of HIT begins with 4T score clinical assessment, followed by laboratory testing for those not deemed low risk. Laboratory testing for HIT includes screening [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] and confirmatory [serotonin release assay (SRA)] assays, wherein SRA testing can be pursued following a positive ELISA result. These tests aid diagnosis of HIT, but also introduce interpretive challenges, additional costs, and delays in clinical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 1011 HIT ELISA and 169 SRA tests performed over 5 years was conducted. ELISA percent inhibition and ELISA low-heparin optical density (OD) were evaluated for positive predictive value (PPV). Based on these findings, HIT ELISA reporting and management algorithm changes were implemented and metrics compared for 5 months pre- and post-intervention to assess intervention success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Equivocal and positive HIT ELISA interpretation showed poor PPV based on percent inhibition (0.20 and 0.32, respectively). However, rising low-heparin OD correlated with increasing PPV (PPV of 0.00 for OD values 0.40-1.00, 0.29 for values 1.00-1.99, and 0.91 for values >2.00). Data-driven intervention decreased ELISA positivity rates (13% to 5%), decreased rates of SRA confirmatory testing overall (13% to 9%), decreased SRA testing rates for patients with non-negative ELISAs (78% to 43%), and increased heparin resumption (20% to 57%). Hematology consults remained relatively stable (78% and 86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-heparin OD-based HIT ELISA interpretation yielded enhanced PPV compared with percent inhibition-based interpretation. Implementation of data-driven changes improved testing stewardship and clinical management for patients with non-negative ELISAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction with numerous diagnostic challenges. Diagnosis of HIT begins with 4T score clinical assessment, followed by laboratory testing for those not deemed low risk. Laboratory testing for HIT includes screening [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] and confirmatory [serotonin release assay (SRA)] assays, wherein SRA testing can be pursued following a positive ELISA result. These tests aid diagnosis of HIT, but also introduce interpretive challenges, additional costs, and delays in clinical intervention.

Methods: A retrospective review of 1011 HIT ELISA and 169 SRA tests performed over 5 years was conducted. ELISA percent inhibition and ELISA low-heparin optical density (OD) were evaluated for positive predictive value (PPV). Based on these findings, HIT ELISA reporting and management algorithm changes were implemented and metrics compared for 5 months pre- and post-intervention to assess intervention success.

Results: Equivocal and positive HIT ELISA interpretation showed poor PPV based on percent inhibition (0.20 and 0.32, respectively). However, rising low-heparin OD correlated with increasing PPV (PPV of 0.00 for OD values 0.40-1.00, 0.29 for values 1.00-1.99, and 0.91 for values >2.00). Data-driven intervention decreased ELISA positivity rates (13% to 5%), decreased rates of SRA confirmatory testing overall (13% to 9%), decreased SRA testing rates for patients with non-negative ELISAs (78% to 43%), and increased heparin resumption (20% to 57%). Hematology consults remained relatively stable (78% and 86%).

Conclusions: Low-heparin OD-based HIT ELISA interpretation yielded enhanced PPV compared with percent inhibition-based interpretation. Implementation of data-driven changes improved testing stewardship and clinical management for patients with non-negative ELISAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高肝素诱导血小板减少症(HIT)检测的诊断效用:一个学术医疗中心的应用分析与干预。
背景:肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是一种潜在的危及生命的药物不良反应,具有许多诊断挑战。HIT的诊断从4T评分临床评估开始,然后对那些不被认为是低风险的患者进行实验室检测。HIT的实验室检测包括筛选[酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)]和确认[血清素释放试验(SRA)]测定,其中SRA检测可以在ELISA阳性结果后进行。这些测试有助于HIT的诊断,但也带来了解释上的挑战、额外的费用和临床干预的延误。方法:对5年来进行的1011例HIT ELISA和169例SRA试验进行回顾性分析。采用ELISA法对阳性预测值(PPV)和ELISA法低肝素光密度(OD)进行评价。基于这些发现,实施了HIT ELISA报告和管理算法更改,并比较了干预前后5个月的指标,以评估干预成功。结果:基于抑制百分率(分别为0.20和0.32)的模糊和阳性ELISA解释显示PPV较差。然而,低肝素OD升高与PPV升高相关(OD值0.40 ~ 1.00时PPV为0.00,1.00 ~ 1.99时PPV为0.29,> ~ 2.00时PPV为0.91)。数据驱动的干预降低了ELISA阳性率(13%至5%),降低了总体SRA确认检测率(13%至9%),降低了非阴性ELISA患者的SRA检测率(78%至43%),并增加了肝素恢复(20%至57%)。血液学咨询保持相对稳定(78%和86%)。结论:与基于百分比抑制的解释相比,基于低肝素od的HIT ELISA解释产生了更高的PPV。数据驱动变化的实施改善了非阴性elisa患者的检测管理和临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations. Adrenal Venous Sampling in the Investigation of Hyperaldosteronism: A Retrospective Practice Review from a Large Academic Medical Center. An Introduction to the Complete Blood Count for Clinical Chemists: White Blood Cells. Electric Trends of Laboratory Medicine: Five Years of Growth, Visibility, and Opportunity. Analytical Validation and Performance of a Blood-Based P-tau217 Diagnostic Test for Alzheimer Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1