Retrospective Cohort Study on the Predictive Value of Primary Non-response to Initial Biologic for Future Biologic Use in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08816-9
Mahesh Krishna, Ellen J Spartz, Laura Maas, Vivy Cusumano, Sowmya Sharma, Berkeley Limketkai, Alyssa Parian
{"title":"Retrospective Cohort Study on the Predictive Value of Primary Non-response to Initial Biologic for Future Biologic Use in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Mahesh Krishna, Ellen J Spartz, Laura Maas, Vivy Cusumano, Sowmya Sharma, Berkeley Limketkai, Alyssa Parian","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08816-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective chart review study was performed with patients with IBD that received two or more biologics. PNR was defined as no clinical or symptomatic improvement after at least six weeks of treatment leading to cessation of drug. Patients who stopped their first biologic due to adverse side effects were classified in the intolerance group. Patients with initial significant response to biologic followed by a loss of response were classified as secondary loss of response (SLOR). Data analysis was performed with Python and Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 249 patients that met inclusion criteria, there were 87 patients with PNR, 96 patients with SLOR, and 66 patients with intolerance to their first biologic exposure. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC: 41.3%, p = 0.0083) and IBD-unclassified (IC: 56.3%, p = 0.0099) were found to have a significantly higher rate of primary non-response compared to patients with Crohn's disease (CD: 25.0%). Patients on adalimumab for their first biologic had a significantly (p = 0.0014) higher rate of PNR (42.7%, UC: 50.0%, CD: 32.7%) compared to those on infliximab (23.0%, UC: 31.0%, CD: 12.1%). Patients with PNR did not have a higher rate of second biologic nonresponse when compared to patients who had SLOR or intolerance to their first biologic. Univariate analyses demonstrated no difference in rates of response to second biologic when switching intra-class or out-of-class.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ulcerative colitis and IBDU have higher rates of PNR compared to Crohn's disease, but still have high response rates to second biologic agents. Adalimumab may be a suboptimal initial biologic given its higher PNR rate compared to infliximab. Our results support that there is an equally likely chance of response to second biologic after first biologic PNR. Subanalyses evaluating intraclass and out-of-class medication switching showed similar success.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08816-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective chart review study was performed with patients with IBD that received two or more biologics. PNR was defined as no clinical or symptomatic improvement after at least six weeks of treatment leading to cessation of drug. Patients who stopped their first biologic due to adverse side effects were classified in the intolerance group. Patients with initial significant response to biologic followed by a loss of response were classified as secondary loss of response (SLOR). Data analysis was performed with Python and Excel.

Results: Of the 249 patients that met inclusion criteria, there were 87 patients with PNR, 96 patients with SLOR, and 66 patients with intolerance to their first biologic exposure. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC: 41.3%, p = 0.0083) and IBD-unclassified (IC: 56.3%, p = 0.0099) were found to have a significantly higher rate of primary non-response compared to patients with Crohn's disease (CD: 25.0%). Patients on adalimumab for their first biologic had a significantly (p = 0.0014) higher rate of PNR (42.7%, UC: 50.0%, CD: 32.7%) compared to those on infliximab (23.0%, UC: 31.0%, CD: 12.1%). Patients with PNR did not have a higher rate of second biologic nonresponse when compared to patients who had SLOR or intolerance to their first biologic. Univariate analyses demonstrated no difference in rates of response to second biologic when switching intra-class or out-of-class.

Conclusion: Ulcerative colitis and IBDU have higher rates of PNR compared to Crohn's disease, but still have high response rates to second biologic agents. Adalimumab may be a suboptimal initial biologic given its higher PNR rate compared to infliximab. Our results support that there is an equally likely chance of response to second biologic after first biologic PNR. Subanalyses evaluating intraclass and out-of-class medication switching showed similar success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症性肠病患者最初对生物制剂无反应对未来生物制剂使用的预测价值的回顾性队列研究
背景:治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的药物治疗方法不断增加,治疗选择也越来越多,特别是在首次生物学失败后。目前,关于首次生物主要无反应(PNR)对后续生物成功的预测价值的研究有限。我们的目的是确定IBD的第一个生物制剂的PNR是否预测对后续生物治疗的反应。方法:对接受两种或两种以上生物制剂治疗的IBD患者进行多中心回顾性研究。PNR被定义为在治疗至少6周后无临床或症状改善导致停药。由于不良副作用而停用第一次生物制剂的患者被归类为不耐受组。最初对生物制剂有显著反应,随后反应丧失的患者被归类为继发性反应丧失(SLOR)。使用Python和Excel进行数据分析。结果:在249例符合纳入标准的患者中,有87例为PNR, 96例为SLOR, 66例为首次生物暴露不耐受。溃疡性结肠炎患者(UC: 41.3%, p = 0.0083)和未分类ibd患者(IC: 56.3%, p = 0.0099)的原发性无应答率明显高于克罗恩病患者(CD: 25.0%)。与英夫利昔单抗组(23.0%,UC: 31.0%, CD: 12.1%)相比,阿达木单抗组首次使用生物制剂的患者PNR率(42.7%,UC: 50.0%, CD: 32.7%)显著(p = 0.0014)更高。与SLOR或对第一次生物制剂不耐受的患者相比,PNR患者的第二次生物制剂无反应率并不高。单变量分析表明,当切换到班内或班外时,对第二生物制剂的反应率没有差异。结论:溃疡性结肠炎和IBDU的PNR发生率高于克罗恩病,但对第二生物制剂的有效率仍较高。与英夫利昔单抗相比,阿达木单抗的PNR率更高,可能是一种次优的初始生物制剂。我们的结果支持,在第一次生物PNR后,对第二次生物PNR有同样可能的反应。评估课堂内和课堂外药物转换的亚分析显示相似的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
A Residual Laterally Spreading Tumor that Regressed After Chemotherapy Following Surgical Resection of Sigmoid Cancer. Are Non-invasive Multi-cancer Early Cancer Detection Tests the Future? Cholangioscope-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy in the Management of Chronic Abdominal Pain Related to the Appendix: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Results of Endoscopic Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Biliary Obstruction in Patients with Self-Expanding Metal Stents. Abbreviated Duration of Vasoactive Agents Has Similar Outcomes as Standard Duration of Therapy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1