Seong-Keun Yoo, Conall W. Fitzgerald, Byuri Angela Cho, Bailey G. Fitzgerald, Catherine Han, Elizabeth S. Koh, Abhinav Pandey, Hannah Sfreddo, Fionnuala Crowley, Michelle Rudshteyn Korostin, Neha Debnath, Yan Leyfman, Cristina Valero, Mark Lee, Joris L. Vos, Andrew Sangho Lee, Karena Zhao, Stanley Lam, Ezekiel Olumuyide, Fengshen Kuo, Eric A. Wilson, Pauline Hamon, Clotilde Hennequin, Miriam Saffern, Lynda Vuong, A. Ari Hakimi, Brian Brown, Miriam Merad, Sacha Gnjatic, Nina Bhardwaj, Matthew D. Galsky, Eric E. Schadt, Robert M. Samstein, Thomas U. Marron, Mithat Gönen, Luc G. T. Morris, Diego Chowell
{"title":"Prediction of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy efficacy for cancer using routine blood tests and clinical data","authors":"Seong-Keun Yoo, Conall W. Fitzgerald, Byuri Angela Cho, Bailey G. Fitzgerald, Catherine Han, Elizabeth S. Koh, Abhinav Pandey, Hannah Sfreddo, Fionnuala Crowley, Michelle Rudshteyn Korostin, Neha Debnath, Yan Leyfman, Cristina Valero, Mark Lee, Joris L. Vos, Andrew Sangho Lee, Karena Zhao, Stanley Lam, Ezekiel Olumuyide, Fengshen Kuo, Eric A. Wilson, Pauline Hamon, Clotilde Hennequin, Miriam Saffern, Lynda Vuong, A. Ari Hakimi, Brian Brown, Miriam Merad, Sacha Gnjatic, Nina Bhardwaj, Matthew D. Galsky, Eric E. Schadt, Robert M. Samstein, Thomas U. Marron, Mithat Gönen, Luc G. T. Morris, Diego Chowell","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03398-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting whether a patient with cancer will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) without resorting to advanced genomic or immunologic assays is an important clinical need. To address this, we developed and evaluated SCORPIO, a machine learning system that utilizes routine blood tests (complete blood count and comprehensive metabolic profile) alongside clinical characteristics from 9,745 ICI-treated patients across 21 cancer types. SCORPIO was trained on data from 1,628 patients across 17 cancer types from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. In two internal test sets comprising 2,511 patients across 19 cancer types, SCORPIO achieved median time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC(t)) values of 0.763 and 0.759 for predicting overall survival at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months, outperforming tumor mutational burden (TMB), which showed median AUC(t) values of 0.503 and 0.543. Additionally, SCORPIO demonstrated superior predictive performance for predicting clinical benefit (tumor response or prolonged stability), with AUC values of 0.714 and 0.641, compared to TMB (AUC = 0.546 and 0.573). External validation was performed using 10 global phase 3 trials (4,447 patients across 6 cancer types) and a real-world cohort from the Mount Sinai Health System (1,159 patients across 18 cancer types). In these external cohorts, SCORPIO maintained robust performance in predicting ICI outcomes, surpassing programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining. These findings underscore SCORPIO’s reliability and adaptability, highlighting its potential to predict patient outcomes with ICI therapy across diverse cancer types and healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03398-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predicting whether a patient with cancer will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) without resorting to advanced genomic or immunologic assays is an important clinical need. To address this, we developed and evaluated SCORPIO, a machine learning system that utilizes routine blood tests (complete blood count and comprehensive metabolic profile) alongside clinical characteristics from 9,745 ICI-treated patients across 21 cancer types. SCORPIO was trained on data from 1,628 patients across 17 cancer types from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. In two internal test sets comprising 2,511 patients across 19 cancer types, SCORPIO achieved median time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC(t)) values of 0.763 and 0.759 for predicting overall survival at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months, outperforming tumor mutational burden (TMB), which showed median AUC(t) values of 0.503 and 0.543. Additionally, SCORPIO demonstrated superior predictive performance for predicting clinical benefit (tumor response or prolonged stability), with AUC values of 0.714 and 0.641, compared to TMB (AUC = 0.546 and 0.573). External validation was performed using 10 global phase 3 trials (4,447 patients across 6 cancer types) and a real-world cohort from the Mount Sinai Health System (1,159 patients across 18 cancer types). In these external cohorts, SCORPIO maintained robust performance in predicting ICI outcomes, surpassing programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining. These findings underscore SCORPIO’s reliability and adaptability, highlighting its potential to predict patient outcomes with ICI therapy across diverse cancer types and healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.