Comparison of Ceramic Bonding to Cobalt–Chromium, Zirconia and Nickel–Chromium Alloys Fabricated Using of Various Techniques

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.35522
Elie E. Daou, Mutlu Özcan
{"title":"Comparison of Ceramic Bonding to Cobalt–Chromium, Zirconia and Nickel–Chromium Alloys Fabricated Using of Various Techniques","authors":"Elie E. Daou,&nbsp;Mutlu Özcan","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of the ceramic bonding to cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) alloys fabricated by casting, milling, and additive manufacturing, compared with zirconia and nickel–chromium. One hundred specimens (<i>N</i> = 100), prepared with the dimensions of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm<sup>3</sup>, were assigned to five groups (<i>n</i> = 20): presintered milled Co–Cr (Group M), additively manufactured Co–Cr (Group SLM), cast Co–Cr (Group C), presintered zirconia (Group Zi), and cast Ni–Cr (Group Ni). The bar specimens were prepared to receive porcelain on their central area (8 × 3 mm<sup>2</sup>) of one side of each alloy strip. Only half of the specimens from each group were exposed to thermocycling (5°C–55°C for 5000 times). All specimens were placed in a bending device. Specimen surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The bonding values between materials and the aging treatment effect groups were compared with two-way ANOVA. Variances were compared using the Levene test, the Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple pairwise comparisons. The shape (<i>m</i>) and scale (<i>σ</i><sub>0</sub>) parameters of the two-parameter Weibull distribution values were calculated. Thermocycling did not affect the results of all the groups tested (<i>p</i> = 0.237). Statistical difference was found between the Co–Cr groups, and between groups Ni and Zi when compared to groups C and SLM (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Ni had the lowest adhesion values and cast Co–Cr the highest. A statistical difference was found between the three Co–Cr groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with the highest ceramic adhesion found in Group C and the lowest found in Group M. All specimens from Groups M, C, and Ni showed adhesive failures, whereas mixed failures were observed in Groups Zi and SLM. The fit of the maximum-likelihood line was a poor fit in the distribution of the aged SLM group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.010). Ceramic adhesion and failure types varied with the alloy choice and the manufacturing technique.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of the ceramic bonding to cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) alloys fabricated by casting, milling, and additive manufacturing, compared with zirconia and nickel–chromium. One hundred specimens (N = 100), prepared with the dimensions of 25 × 3 × 0.5 mm3, were assigned to five groups (n = 20): presintered milled Co–Cr (Group M), additively manufactured Co–Cr (Group SLM), cast Co–Cr (Group C), presintered zirconia (Group Zi), and cast Ni–Cr (Group Ni). The bar specimens were prepared to receive porcelain on their central area (8 × 3 mm2) of one side of each alloy strip. Only half of the specimens from each group were exposed to thermocycling (5°C–55°C for 5000 times). All specimens were placed in a bending device. Specimen surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy. The bonding values between materials and the aging treatment effect groups were compared with two-way ANOVA. Variances were compared using the Levene test, the Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple pairwise comparisons. The shape (m) and scale (σ0) parameters of the two-parameter Weibull distribution values were calculated. Thermocycling did not affect the results of all the groups tested (p = 0.237). Statistical difference was found between the Co–Cr groups, and between groups Ni and Zi when compared to groups C and SLM (p < 0.001). Ni had the lowest adhesion values and cast Co–Cr the highest. A statistical difference was found between the three Co–Cr groups (p < 0.001), with the highest ceramic adhesion found in Group C and the lowest found in Group M. All specimens from Groups M, C, and Ni showed adhesive failures, whereas mixed failures were observed in Groups Zi and SLM. The fit of the maximum-likelihood line was a poor fit in the distribution of the aged SLM group (p < 0.010). Ceramic adhesion and failure types varied with the alloy choice and the manufacturing technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同工艺制备的钴铬、氧化锆和镍铬合金的陶瓷键合比较。
本研究的目的是评估通过铸造、铣削和增材制造制备的钴铬(Co-Cr)合金与氧化锆和镍铬合金的陶瓷结合特性。制备尺寸为25 × 3 × 0.5 mm3的样品100个(N = 100),分为5组(N = 20):预熔磨Co-Cr (M组)、增材制造Co-Cr (SLM组)、铸态Co-Cr (C组)、预熔氧化锆(Zi组)和铸态Ni- cr (Ni组)。在每个合金条的一侧的中心区域(8 × 3 mm2)上准备棒样以接收瓷器。每组只有一半的标本进行热循环(5°C-55°C, 5000次)。所有试件均置于弯曲装置中。用扫描电镜观察试样表面形貌。材料与时效处理效果组之间的结合值采用双因素方差分析进行比较。方差比较采用Levene检验,多组两两比较采用Bonferroni调整。计算了双参数威布尔分布值的形状(m)和尺度(σ0)参数。热循环不影响所有测试组的结果(p = 0.237)。与C组和SLM组相比,Co-Cr组之间、Ni组和Zi组之间的差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Platelet-Rich Plasma Loaded Alginate-Based Injectable Hydrogel for Meniscal Tear Repair: In Vivo Evaluation in Lapine Model Mechanical Characterization of Amniotic-Based Scaffolds Containing Silk Fibroin and Sodium Alginate Nanofibers A Cutting-Edge Multilayer Nanofiber Wound Dressing: Design, Synthesis, and Investigation for Enhanced Wound Healing In Vitro and In Vivo Biosafety and Efficacy Studies of Colchicine-Encapsulated Liposomes for Ocular Inflammatory Diseases Simvastatin-Loaded Chitosan Microspheres as a Biomaterial for Dentin Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1