Effect of vasopressin on brain and cardiac tissue during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100837
Ali Chaudhry, Megan O'Reilly, Marwa Ramsie, Tze-Fun Lee, Po-Yin Cheung, Georg M Schmölzer
{"title":"Effect of vasopressin on brain and cardiac tissue during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets.","authors":"Ali Chaudhry, Megan O'Reilly, Marwa Ramsie, Tze-Fun Lee, Po-Yin Cheung, Georg M Schmölzer","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epinephrine is currently the only recommended cardio-resuscitative medication for use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as per consensus of science and treatment recommendations. An alternative medication, vasopressin, may be beneficial, however there is limited data regarding its effect on cardiac and brain tissue following recovery from neonatal CPR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine during resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets on cardiac and brain tissue injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newborn piglets (n = 10/group) were anesthetized, tracheotomized and intubated, instrumented, and exposed to hypoxia-asphyxia and cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomly allocated to receive intravenous vasopressin (Vaso, 0.4 U/kg) or epinephrine (Epi, 0.02 mg/kg) during CPR until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Left ventricle cardiac tissue, and frontoparietal cerebral cortex and thalamus samples from brain tissue were collected from piglets that survived four hours after ROSC. The concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, cardiac troponin-1, lactate, and levels of oxidized and total glutathione were quantified in tissue homogenates.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The median time (IQR) to ROSC was 127 (98-162)sec with Vaso and 197 (117-480)sec with Epi (p = 0.07). ROSC rate was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 7/10 (70 %) with Epi (p = 0.21); survival to four hours after ROSC was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 5/7 (71 %) with Epi (p = 0.15). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011). Cardiac tissue IL-8 concentration was significantly lower with Vaso than Epi (16.9 (2.94)pg/mg vs. 33.0 (6.75)pg/mg, p = 0.026). All other markers of cardiac and brain tissue injury were similar between Vaso and Epi groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vasopressin is effective in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets and is associated with reduced inflammation of the myocardium compared to epinephrine, and there was no evidence of increased tissue injury in the frontoparietal cortex and thalamus regions of the brain. Vasopressin might be a viable alternative to epinephrine during neonatal CPR, but further studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"21 ","pages":"100837"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epinephrine is currently the only recommended cardio-resuscitative medication for use in neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as per consensus of science and treatment recommendations. An alternative medication, vasopressin, may be beneficial, however there is limited data regarding its effect on cardiac and brain tissue following recovery from neonatal CPR.

Aim: To compare the effects of vasopressin and epinephrine during resuscitation of asphyxiated post-transitional piglets on cardiac and brain tissue injury.

Methods: Newborn piglets (n = 10/group) were anesthetized, tracheotomized and intubated, instrumented, and exposed to hypoxia-asphyxia and cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomly allocated to receive intravenous vasopressin (Vaso, 0.4 U/kg) or epinephrine (Epi, 0.02 mg/kg) during CPR until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Left ventricle cardiac tissue, and frontoparietal cerebral cortex and thalamus samples from brain tissue were collected from piglets that survived four hours after ROSC. The concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, cardiac troponin-1, lactate, and levels of oxidized and total glutathione were quantified in tissue homogenates.

Main results: The median time (IQR) to ROSC was 127 (98-162)sec with Vaso and 197 (117-480)sec with Epi (p = 0.07). ROSC rate was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 7/10 (70 %) with Epi (p = 0.21); survival to four hours after ROSC was 10/10 (100 %) with Vaso and 5/7 (71 %) with Epi (p = 0.15). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different between groups (p = 0.011). Cardiac tissue IL-8 concentration was significantly lower with Vaso than Epi (16.9 (2.94)pg/mg vs. 33.0 (6.75)pg/mg, p = 0.026). All other markers of cardiac and brain tissue injury were similar between Vaso and Epi groups.

Conclusions: Vasopressin is effective in the resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets and is associated with reduced inflammation of the myocardium compared to epinephrine, and there was no evidence of increased tissue injury in the frontoparietal cortex and thalamus regions of the brain. Vasopressin might be a viable alternative to epinephrine during neonatal CPR, but further studies are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后叶加压素对新生儿心肺复苏过程中窒息仔猪脑和心脏组织的影响。
背景:根据科学和治疗建议的共识,肾上腺素是目前唯一被推荐用于新生儿心肺复苏(CPR)的心脏复苏药物。一种替代药物,抗利尿激素,可能是有益的,然而,关于其对新生儿心肺复苏术恢复后心脏和脑组织的影响的数据有限。目的:比较过渡期窒息仔猪复苏过程中加压素和肾上腺素对心脏和脑组织损伤的影响。方法:新生仔猪(10只/组)麻醉、气管切开、插管、插管、缺氧、窒息、心脏骤停。仔猪在心肺复苏术中随机分配静脉注射抗利尿激素(Vaso, 0.4 U/kg)或肾上腺素(Epi, 0.02 mg/kg),直至恢复自然循环(ROSC)。从ROSC后存活4小时的仔猪的脑组织中采集左心室心脏组织、大脑额顶叶皮层和丘脑样本。测定组织匀浆中促炎细胞因子白介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、IL-8、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、心肌肌钙蛋白-1、乳酸的浓度以及氧化谷胱甘肽和总谷胱甘肽的水平。主要结果:Vaso组至ROSC的中位时间(IQR)为127 (98-162)sec, Epi组为197 (117-480)sec (p = 0.07)。Vaso组的ROSC率为10/10 (100%),Epi组为7/10 (70%)(p = 0.21);Vaso组至ROSC后4小时的生存率为10/10 (100%),Epi组为5/7 (71%)(p = 0.15)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.011)。Vaso组心肌组织IL-8浓度显著低于Epi组(16.9 (2.94)pg/mg vs. 33.0 (6.75)pg/mg, p = 0.026)。在Vaso组和Epi组之间,心脏和脑组织损伤的其他指标相似。结论:与肾上腺素相比,加压素对窒息新生仔猪的复苏是有效的,并且与心肌炎症的减少有关,并且没有证据表明大脑额顶叶皮层和丘脑区域的组织损伤增加。加压素可能是新生儿心肺复苏术中肾上腺素的可行替代品,但需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
In-hospital cardiac arrest in middle-income settings: A comprehensive analysis of clinical profiles and outcomes of both adults and pediatrics. Hand position during chest compression in infantile piglets - Do you need to encircle the chest with the 2-thumb-technique? ILCOR World Restart a Heart - Spreading global CPR awareness and empowering communities to save lives since 2018. Challenges during cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Ireland 2012 to 2020: Bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation and survival in the Utstein comparator group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1