“All sorts of colours of emotions”: Ambulance call-handlers’ perceptions of the barriers to CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100904
Barbara Farquharson , Marie Johnston , Rosaleen O’Brien , Gareth Clegg
{"title":"“All sorts of colours of emotions”: Ambulance call-handlers’ perceptions of the barriers to CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest","authors":"Barbara Farquharson ,&nbsp;Marie Johnston ,&nbsp;Rosaleen O’Brien ,&nbsp;Gareth Clegg","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore call-handlers’ perceptions of the main barriers to achieving CPR during emergency calls to the ambulance service.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty purposively sampled call-handlers, working in seven UK ambulance dispatch centres, participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews designed to explore their experiences of providing CPR instructions and their perceptions of the most common barriers to initiation of CPR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants (20F 9 M 1non-binary), aged 21–57 years, with varied length of experience (6mths −25 yrs), self-reported confidence (3–10/10), experience of NHS Pathways and MPDS, described providing CPR calls typically once per shift, with most call-handlers reporting barriers to CPR in most calls.</div><div>The barriers to initiating CPR most commonly identified by call-handlers were the strong emotions experienced by callers; physical issues relating to the caller, patient and situation; uncertainty about whether CPR was required, particularly uncertainty about breathing and caller concerns about doing harm.</div><div>Participants described many overlapping issues, making each call a unique challenge. They also provided insights into the complexities of ambiguous situations such as those encountered by carers and care-homes, DNACPR issues, as well as facilitating factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Call-handlers identified barriers to CPR that echo those identified via other study methods plus provide additional insights into areas not readily addressed by current protocols. Call-handlers’ perspectives may be helpful in identifying priority areas for protocol refinement and ways to improve the efficacy of CPR instructions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100904"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To explore call-handlers’ perceptions of the main barriers to achieving CPR during emergency calls to the ambulance service.

Methods

Thirty purposively sampled call-handlers, working in seven UK ambulance dispatch centres, participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews designed to explore their experiences of providing CPR instructions and their perceptions of the most common barriers to initiation of CPR.

Results

Participants (20F 9 M 1non-binary), aged 21–57 years, with varied length of experience (6mths −25 yrs), self-reported confidence (3–10/10), experience of NHS Pathways and MPDS, described providing CPR calls typically once per shift, with most call-handlers reporting barriers to CPR in most calls.
The barriers to initiating CPR most commonly identified by call-handlers were the strong emotions experienced by callers; physical issues relating to the caller, patient and situation; uncertainty about whether CPR was required, particularly uncertainty about breathing and caller concerns about doing harm.
Participants described many overlapping issues, making each call a unique challenge. They also provided insights into the complexities of ambiguous situations such as those encountered by carers and care-homes, DNACPR issues, as well as facilitating factors.

Conclusion

Call-handlers identified barriers to CPR that echo those identified via other study methods plus provide additional insights into areas not readily addressed by current protocols. Call-handlers’ perspectives may be helpful in identifying priority areas for protocol refinement and ways to improve the efficacy of CPR instructions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“各种各样的情绪”:救护车呼叫处理人员对院外心脏骤停时实施CPR的障碍的看法
目的探讨呼叫处理人员对紧急呼叫救护车服务期间实现心肺复苏术的主要障碍的看法。方法:在英国7个救护车调度中心,有目的地抽取了30名呼叫处理人员,参与了半结构化的定性访谈,旨在探讨他们提供CPR指导的经验以及他们对启动CPR最常见障碍的看法。结果参与者(20f9 M),年龄21-57岁,具有不同的经验长度(6个月- 25年),自我报告的信心(3-10/10),NHS路径和MPDS的经验,描述了通常每班提供一次CPR呼叫,大多数呼叫处理人员在大多数呼叫中报告了CPR障碍。呼叫处理人员最常发现的启动CPR的障碍是呼叫者经历的强烈情绪;与来电者、病人和情况有关的身体问题;不确定是否需要心肺复苏术,特别是不确定呼吸和打电话的人担心造成伤害。与会者描述了许多重叠的问题,使得每个电话都是一个独特的挑战。他们还提供了对模棱两可情况的复杂性的见解,例如护理员和护理院所遇到的情况,DNACPR问题以及促进因素。结论:呼叫处理人员发现了心肺复苏术的障碍,这些障碍与通过其他研究方法发现的障碍相呼应,并为当前方案尚未解决的领域提供了额外的见解。呼叫处理者的观点可能有助于确定协议改进的优先领域和提高CPR指示有效性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Young ERC Resuscitation Science Masterclass Journal Club article: the ARREST trial Preparedness deserts: a framework for understanding and addressing geographic inequities in bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Patient and arrest characteristics associated with rearrest and mortality following out of hospital cardiac arrest Characterization of external defibrillator output and its impact on defibrillation protection of medical equipment Corrective steps during neonatal mask ventilation – a narrative review of the evidence behind the MR SOPA acronym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1