Healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED rates for cardiac arrest in U.S. nursing homes

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100908
Elan Jiang , Rohan Raj , Charles Sherrod , Dan Nguyen , Kevin Kennedy , Paul S. Chan
{"title":"Healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED rates for cardiac arrest in U.S. nursing homes","authors":"Elan Jiang ,&nbsp;Rohan Raj ,&nbsp;Charles Sherrod ,&nbsp;Dan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Kevin Kennedy ,&nbsp;Paul S. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nursing home residents are typically excluded in studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Since nursing homes have on-site healthcare staff, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) for OHCA would ideally be 100% before arrival of 9-1-1 emergency responders. However, little is known about healthcare provider bystander response and the degree of variability in initiating CPR and AED use in nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Within the U.S. CARES registry, we identified 71,530 adults at nursing homes who had resuscitation initiated for OHCA between 2013–2021. We assessed rates of bystander CPR and AED application by nursing home healthcare staff. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, we quantified variation in healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates using the median odds ratio (OR), which estimates the difference in odds that 2 similar patients with OHCA would receive healthcare provider bystander CPR or have an AED applied at two randomly selected nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean age was 74 ± 13 years and 53.5% were men. Overall, 58,814 (82.2%) patients received healthcare provider bystander CPR and 20,302 (28.4%) had an AED applied. Among 4014 nursing homes with ≥5 OHCAs (<em>n</em> = 42,399), the median OR for healthcare provider bystander CPR was 2.13 (95% CI: 2.05–2.22) and the median OR for healthcare provider bystander AED application was 4.54 (95% CI: 4.31–4.76), both suggesting several-fold variation in treatment across nursing homes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In U.S. nursing homes, healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates were not ideal, with large variation in both rates across sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nursing home residents are typically excluded in studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Since nursing homes have on-site healthcare staff, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) for OHCA would ideally be 100% before arrival of 9-1-1 emergency responders. However, little is known about healthcare provider bystander response and the degree of variability in initiating CPR and AED use in nursing homes.

Methods

Within the U.S. CARES registry, we identified 71,530 adults at nursing homes who had resuscitation initiated for OHCA between 2013–2021. We assessed rates of bystander CPR and AED application by nursing home healthcare staff. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, we quantified variation in healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates using the median odds ratio (OR), which estimates the difference in odds that 2 similar patients with OHCA would receive healthcare provider bystander CPR or have an AED applied at two randomly selected nursing homes.

Results

Mean age was 74 ± 13 years and 53.5% were men. Overall, 58,814 (82.2%) patients received healthcare provider bystander CPR and 20,302 (28.4%) had an AED applied. Among 4014 nursing homes with ≥5 OHCAs (n = 42,399), the median OR for healthcare provider bystander CPR was 2.13 (95% CI: 2.05–2.22) and the median OR for healthcare provider bystander AED application was 4.54 (95% CI: 4.31–4.76), both suggesting several-fold variation in treatment across nursing homes.

Conclusion

In U.S. nursing homes, healthcare provider bystander CPR and AED application rates were not ideal, with large variation in both rates across sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国养老院中心脏骤停的医护人员旁观者CPR和AED率
研究背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的研究通常不包括养老院居民。由于养老院有现场医护人员,理想情况下,在911紧急救援人员到达之前,对OHCA进行心肺复苏术(CPR)和自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用将达到100%。然而,关于医疗保健提供者的旁观者反应和在养老院启动CPR和AED使用的可变性程度知之甚少。方法:在美国护理中心注册表中,我们确定了2013-2021年期间因OHCA进行复苏的养老院71530名成年人。我们评估了养老院医护人员的旁观者CPR和AED应用率。使用多变量分层逻辑回归,我们使用中位数优势比(OR)量化了医护人员旁观者CPR和AED应用率的变化,该比值比估计了2名相似的OHCA患者在随机选择的两家养老院接受医护人员旁观者CPR或AED应用的几率差异。结果患者平均年龄74±13岁,男性占53.5%。总体而言,58,814例(82.2%)患者接受了医疗保健提供者的旁观者CPR, 20,302例(28.4%)患者使用了AED。在4014家拥有≥5个ohca的养老院(n = 42399)中,医疗保健提供者旁观者CPR的中位OR为2.13 (95% CI: 2.05-2.22),医疗保健提供者旁观者AED应用的中位OR为4.54 (95% CI: 4.31-4.76),两者都表明不同疗养院的治疗存在数倍差异。结论在美国养老院,医护人员的旁观者CPR和AED的使用率并不理想,不同地点的使用率差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Young ERC Resuscitation Science Masterclass Journal Club article: the ARREST trial Preparedness deserts: a framework for understanding and addressing geographic inequities in bystander response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Patient and arrest characteristics associated with rearrest and mortality following out of hospital cardiac arrest Characterization of external defibrillator output and its impact on defibrillation protection of medical equipment Corrective steps during neonatal mask ventilation – a narrative review of the evidence behind the MR SOPA acronym
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1