Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05238-x
Jihad Mallat, Matthew T. Siuba, Osama Abou-Arab, Pedja Kovacevic, Khaled Ismail, Abhijit Duggal, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
{"title":"Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jihad Mallat, Matthew T. Siuba, Osama Abou-Arab, Pedja Kovacevic, Khaled Ismail, Abhijit Duggal, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05238-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is limited in low tidal volume mechanical ventilation. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in PPV can reliably predict preload/fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in the intensive care unit. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for diagnostic research relevant to the predictability of PPV change after PLR in low-tidal volume mechanically ventilated patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. In-between study heterogeneity was assessed through the I2 indicator. Publication bias was assessed by the Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. Summary receiving operating characteristic curve (SROC), pooled sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Five studies with a total of 474 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The SROC of the absolute PPV change resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93), with overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.76–0.89), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 35 (95% CI 19–67). The mean and median cutoff values of PLR-induced absolute change in absolute PPV were both -2 points and ranged from -2.5 to -1 points. Overall, there was no significant heterogeneity with I2 = 0%. There was no significant publication bias. Fagan's nomogram showed that with a pre-test probability of 50%, the post-test probability reached 84% and 17% for the positive and negative tests, respectively. PLR-induced change in absolute PPV has good diagnostic performance in predicting preload/fluid responsiveness in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume. Trial registration PROSPERO (CRD42024496901). Registered on 15 January 2024.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05238-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is limited in low tidal volume mechanical ventilation. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in PPV can reliably predict preload/fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in the intensive care unit. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for diagnostic research relevant to the predictability of PPV change after PLR in low-tidal volume mechanically ventilated patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. In-between study heterogeneity was assessed through the I2 indicator. Publication bias was assessed by the Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. Summary receiving operating characteristic curve (SROC), pooled sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Five studies with a total of 474 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The SROC of the absolute PPV change resulted in an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88–0.93), with overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.91) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.76–0.89), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 35 (95% CI 19–67). The mean and median cutoff values of PLR-induced absolute change in absolute PPV were both -2 points and ranged from -2.5 to -1 points. Overall, there was no significant heterogeneity with I2 = 0%. There was no significant publication bias. Fagan's nomogram showed that with a pre-test probability of 50%, the post-test probability reached 84% and 17% for the positive and negative tests, respectively. PLR-induced change in absolute PPV has good diagnostic performance in predicting preload/fluid responsiveness in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume. Trial registration PROSPERO (CRD42024496901). Registered on 15 January 2024.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被动抬腿试验预测ICU低潮气量机械通气患者负荷前反应性的脉压变化:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
脉冲压力变化(PPV)在低潮气量机械通气中是有限的。我们进行了这项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估被动抬腿(PLR)引起的PPV变化是否可以可靠地预测重症监护病房低潮气量机械通气患者的预负荷/液体反应性。对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行筛选,寻找与低潮气量机械通气患者PLR后PPV变化可预测性相关的诊断研究。采用QUADAS-2量表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。通过I2指标评估研究间异质性。发表偏倚采用Deeks漏斗图不对称检验。计算总接受工作特征曲线(SROC)、合并敏感性和特异性。这项荟萃分析纳入了5项研究,共474名患者。PPV绝对变化的SROC曲线下面积为0.91 (95% CI 0.88 - 0.93),总体合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.91)和0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.89)。诊断优势比为35 (95% CI 19-67)。plr诱导的绝对PPV绝对变化的均值和中位截止值均为-2点,范围为-2.5 ~ -1点。总体而言,I2 = 0%无显著异质性。没有显著的发表偏倚。Fagan’s nomogram显示,阳性和阴性检测的前测概率为50%,后测概率分别为84%和17%。plr诱导的绝对PPV变化对预测低潮气量机械通气ICU患者的预负荷/液体反应性有较好的诊断价值。试验注册PROSPERO (CRD42024496901)。于2024年1月15日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality intervention on relatives´ mental health distress: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial Enhancing depression risk assessment in critical care nurses: a call for quantitative modeling Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients Trendelenburg position is a reasonable alternative to passive leg raising for predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1