From collective to individual radon risk exposure: An insight into the current European regulation

IF 10.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109264
Eleonora Benà , Giancarlo Ciotoli , Peter Bossew , Luca Verdi , Claudio Mazzoli , Raffaele Sassi
{"title":"From collective to individual radon risk exposure: An insight into the current European regulation","authors":"Eleonora Benà ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Ciotoli ,&nbsp;Peter Bossew ,&nbsp;Luca Verdi ,&nbsp;Claudio Mazzoli ,&nbsp;Raffaele Sassi","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radon (<sup>222</sup>Rn) is a radioactive gas with well-documented harmful effects; the World Health Organization has confirmed it as a cancerogenic for humans. These detrimental effects have prompted Europe to establish national reference levels to protect the exposed population. This is reflected in European directive 59/2013/EURATOM, which has been transposed into the national regulations of EU Member States. Specifically, the directive requires the identification of Radon Priority Areas to facilitate remediation in regions with high Rn levels. The regulation also includes measures for radiation protection, aiming to safeguard the population collectively and individuals from Rn exposure. These two requirements can be conceptualised and translated into two complementary concepts: collective and individual risk. This work addresses the lack of a standardised methodology at the European level for defining radon (Rn) risk across regions. It provides the first approach to transitioning from collective to individual risk areas (CRAs to IRAs), offering clear insights into the application of European Rn protection regulations. Key challenges have been addressed, including geo-hazard mapping without a response variable, evaluating the performance of Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and assessing the use and representativeness of available indoor Rn data to support individual risk assessment. The study also explores the optimal scale for delineating Radon Priority Areas. The effectiveness of this novel approach, which incorporates both collective and individual risk factors in accordance with European regulations, has been tested in a case study in the Bolzano province (north-eastern Italy).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 109264"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025000157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radon (222Rn) is a radioactive gas with well-documented harmful effects; the World Health Organization has confirmed it as a cancerogenic for humans. These detrimental effects have prompted Europe to establish national reference levels to protect the exposed population. This is reflected in European directive 59/2013/EURATOM, which has been transposed into the national regulations of EU Member States. Specifically, the directive requires the identification of Radon Priority Areas to facilitate remediation in regions with high Rn levels. The regulation also includes measures for radiation protection, aiming to safeguard the population collectively and individuals from Rn exposure. These two requirements can be conceptualised and translated into two complementary concepts: collective and individual risk. This work addresses the lack of a standardised methodology at the European level for defining radon (Rn) risk across regions. It provides the first approach to transitioning from collective to individual risk areas (CRAs to IRAs), offering clear insights into the application of European Rn protection regulations. Key challenges have been addressed, including geo-hazard mapping without a response variable, evaluating the performance of Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and assessing the use and representativeness of available indoor Rn data to support individual risk assessment. The study also explores the optimal scale for delineating Radon Priority Areas. The effectiveness of this novel approach, which incorporates both collective and individual risk factors in accordance with European regulations, has been tested in a case study in the Bolzano province (north-eastern Italy).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从集体到个人氡风险暴露:对当前欧洲法规的洞察
氡(222Rn)是一种放射性气体,具有有据可查的有害影响;世界卫生组织已经确认它是人类的致癌物。这些有害影响促使欧洲建立了国家参考水平,以保护受辐射人群。这反映在欧盟指令59/2013/EURATOM中,该指令已被转换为欧盟成员国的国家法规。具体而言,该指令要求确定氡优先区域,以促进在氡水平高的地区进行补救。该条例还包括辐射防护措施,旨在保护全体人口和个人免受放射性物质的照射。这两个要求可以概念化并转化为两个互补的概念:集体风险和个人风险。这项工作解决了在欧洲一级缺乏确定各区域氡风险的标准化方法的问题。它提供了从集体风险区域过渡到个人风险区域(CRAs到IRAs)的第一种方法,为欧洲Rn保护法规的应用提供了清晰的见解。主要挑战已经得到解决,包括没有响应变量的地质灾害制图,评估空间多标准决策分析的性能,以及评估可用室内Rn数据的使用和代表性,以支持个人风险评估。研究还探讨了划定氡优先区域的最佳尺度。这种新方法的有效性已在Bolzano省(意大利东北部)的一个案例研究中得到检验,该方法根据欧洲法规纳入了集体和个人风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
期刊最新文献
Chemical exposure in females of childbearing age associated with sex hormones: Evidence from an untargeted exposomic approach Distance to the water table shapes the diversity and activity of DNA and RNA viruses in a subalpine peatland Habitat-Dependent DNA viral communities in atmospheric aerosols: Insights from terrestrial and marine ecosystems in East Asia A decade of China’s air quality monitoring data suggests health impacts are no longer declining Transcriptome alterations in long-term mining region residents: Insights into immune response and molecular pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1