Oxford Cognitive Screen Brazilian Version: Assessment of Vascular Cognitive Impairment

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.094850
Claudia Cristina Ferreira Ramos, Caroline Suemi Ogusuku, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Ricardo Nitrini
{"title":"Oxford Cognitive Screen Brazilian Version: Assessment of Vascular Cognitive Impairment","authors":"Claudia Cristina Ferreira Ramos, Caroline Suemi Ogusuku, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Ricardo Nitrini","doi":"10.1002/alz.094850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundCognitive impairment is very common in stroke patients and is rarely diagnosed. Cognitive deficits involving language functions, praxis, visuospatial, visuoconstructive skills and memory are prominent. The available cognitive assessment tests do not address some specific characteristics of stroke patients and have important limitations in relation to the most compromised cognitive domains.MethodObservational and descriptive study, with cognitively normal individuals and patients with a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) from the Unified Health System of São Caetano do Sul and São Paulo in Brazil from September 2021 to July 2023.Result108 participants were included in this evaluation, 50 (46.3%) from the stroke group and 58 (53.7%) from the healthy group. The average age was 67 years for the stroke group and 69 years for the healthy group. Our total average number of years of study was 9 years. When comparing the OCS‐Br scores between the groups, we found that there was a significant difference between the groups in writing tasks, executive functions (attention, change of strategy) and memory (Table 1). The comparison of scores on the OCS‐Br by classification of cognition was carried out with a group stratified between Cognitively Healthy and Cognitive Impairment With and Without Dementia, with a statistically significant result between the groups in orientation (p<0.013), visual field (p< 0.045), free evocation (p<0.002), recognition (p<0.010) and circles in seconds (p<0.008).ConclusionWith our results, the need for adequate monitoring and rehabilitation of post‐stroke patients becomes more evident. The advantages of the OCS‐Br are: focus on specific cognitive aspects of stroke, such as visual inattention and visual field testing; assessment in patients with aphasia and visual impairment and prognostic value to predict long‐term functioning","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094850","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCognitive impairment is very common in stroke patients and is rarely diagnosed. Cognitive deficits involving language functions, praxis, visuospatial, visuoconstructive skills and memory are prominent. The available cognitive assessment tests do not address some specific characteristics of stroke patients and have important limitations in relation to the most compromised cognitive domains.MethodObservational and descriptive study, with cognitively normal individuals and patients with a history of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) from the Unified Health System of São Caetano do Sul and São Paulo in Brazil from September 2021 to July 2023.Result108 participants were included in this evaluation, 50 (46.3%) from the stroke group and 58 (53.7%) from the healthy group. The average age was 67 years for the stroke group and 69 years for the healthy group. Our total average number of years of study was 9 years. When comparing the OCS‐Br scores between the groups, we found that there was a significant difference between the groups in writing tasks, executive functions (attention, change of strategy) and memory (Table 1). The comparison of scores on the OCS‐Br by classification of cognition was carried out with a group stratified between Cognitively Healthy and Cognitive Impairment With and Without Dementia, with a statistically significant result between the groups in orientation (p<0.013), visual field (p< 0.045), free evocation (p<0.002), recognition (p<0.010) and circles in seconds (p<0.008).ConclusionWith our results, the need for adequate monitoring and rehabilitation of post‐stroke patients becomes more evident. The advantages of the OCS‐Br are: focus on specific cognitive aspects of stroke, such as visual inattention and visual field testing; assessment in patients with aphasia and visual impairment and prognostic value to predict long‐term functioning
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛津认知屏幕巴西版:血管认知障碍的评估
认知障碍在脑卒中患者中很常见,但很少被诊断出来。涉及语言功能、实践、视觉空间、视觉构建技能和记忆的认知缺陷是突出的。现有的认知评估测试不能解决脑卒中患者的某些特定特征,并且在最受损的认知领域方面具有重要的局限性。方法采用观察性和描述性研究,研究对象为2021年9月至2023年7月来自巴西南卡埃塔诺州和圣保罗州统一卫生系统的认知正常个体和有脑血管事故史的患者。结果共纳入108例受试者,其中卒中组50例(46.3%),健康组58例(53.7%)。中风组的平均年龄为67岁,健康组的平均年龄为69岁。我们的总平均学习年限为9年。在比较两组OCS‐Br得分时,我们发现两组在写作任务、执行功能(注意力、策略改变)和记忆方面存在显著差异(表1)。OCS‐Br得分的认知分类比较采用认知健康组和认知障碍(伴有和不伴有痴呆)组进行,取向组之间的结果具有统计学意义(p<0.013)。视野(p<;0.045),自由唤起(p<0.002),识别(p<0.010)和以秒为单位的圈(p<0.008)。结论根据我们的研究结果,对脑卒中后患者进行充分的监测和康复的必要性变得更加明显。OCS‐Br的优点是:关注中风的特定认知方面,如视觉注意力不集中和视野测试;失语症和视力障碍患者的评估及预测长期功能的预后价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
AAIC Satellite Symposium slated for May 14 to 15 in Lima, Peru A multi-cohort study of longitudinal and cross-sectional Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults Malnutrition exacerbating neuropsychiatric symptoms on the Alzheimer's continuum is relevant to the cAMP signaling pathway: Human and mouse studies Compositional brain scores capture Alzheimer's disease–specific structural brain patterns along the disease continuum A neuropathology case report of a woman with Down syndrome who remained cognitively stable: Implications for resilience to neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1