Cognition Four Decades After High School: Does School Context Matter for Cognitive Disparities at Midlife?

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/alz.091879
Jennifer J. Manly, Koit Hung, Adam M. Brickman, Eric Grodsky, Chandra Muller, John Robert Warren, Michael Culbertson
{"title":"Cognition Four Decades After High School: Does School Context Matter for Cognitive Disparities at Midlife?","authors":"Jennifer J. Manly, Koit Hung, Adam M. Brickman, Eric Grodsky, Chandra Muller, John Robert Warren, Michael Culbertson","doi":"10.1002/alz.091879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundStructural racism shapes educational quality by perpetuating unequal access to school resources, creating disproportionate exposure to disciplinary actions, and limiting access to advanced courses among racially minoritized children. School quality is linked to later life ADRD risk, but the benefit may vary across groups. We asked 1) whether the same high school social contexts and academic resources predict midlife cognitive functioning across race, ethnicity, and gender, and 2) how much could disparities in midlife cognitive function be narrowed if everyone had equal access to high quality high schools?MethodData was from the nationally representative High School and Beyond cohort, which prospectively followed 12,530 Americans from high school through age ∼60 and administered telephone‐ and web‐based measures of memory, language, and attention in 2021‐22. Extensive information about family, high school social and academic context, and student achievements was gathered directly from students and their schools in 1980‐1982. OLS regression models estimated associations between specific school variables and an IRT‐derived cognitive composite, before and after adjustment for confounders in race, ethnicity, and sex stratified models.ResultHigher average SES of students in each high school predicted better midlife cognitive test scores among White people and Latina women, but not among Latino men or Black participants. This association weakened after adding school academic context variables. A composite measure capturing school‐level academic engagement and rigor (academic press) predicted better cognition among White and Latinx participants but not among Black participants. If everyone had access to high schools of the same quality as the group with the highest test scores (White women), and adjusting for family confounders, disparities between White women and participants from racially minoritized groups would be substantially reduced (by 9% among Black women, 5% among Black men, and 6% among Latino men and Latina women).ConclusionInvestment in high schools that serve Black and Latinx children could meaningfully narrow disparities in cognition four decades later, particularly among Black women. Later life cognitive benefit of specific aspects of school context, such as high SES peers and academic rigor, had differential benefit depending on race, ethnicity, and sex.","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundStructural racism shapes educational quality by perpetuating unequal access to school resources, creating disproportionate exposure to disciplinary actions, and limiting access to advanced courses among racially minoritized children. School quality is linked to later life ADRD risk, but the benefit may vary across groups. We asked 1) whether the same high school social contexts and academic resources predict midlife cognitive functioning across race, ethnicity, and gender, and 2) how much could disparities in midlife cognitive function be narrowed if everyone had equal access to high quality high schools?MethodData was from the nationally representative High School and Beyond cohort, which prospectively followed 12,530 Americans from high school through age ∼60 and administered telephone‐ and web‐based measures of memory, language, and attention in 2021‐22. Extensive information about family, high school social and academic context, and student achievements was gathered directly from students and their schools in 1980‐1982. OLS regression models estimated associations between specific school variables and an IRT‐derived cognitive composite, before and after adjustment for confounders in race, ethnicity, and sex stratified models.ResultHigher average SES of students in each high school predicted better midlife cognitive test scores among White people and Latina women, but not among Latino men or Black participants. This association weakened after adding school academic context variables. A composite measure capturing school‐level academic engagement and rigor (academic press) predicted better cognition among White and Latinx participants but not among Black participants. If everyone had access to high schools of the same quality as the group with the highest test scores (White women), and adjusting for family confounders, disparities between White women and participants from racially minoritized groups would be substantially reduced (by 9% among Black women, 5% among Black men, and 6% among Latino men and Latina women).ConclusionInvestment in high schools that serve Black and Latinx children could meaningfully narrow disparities in cognition four decades later, particularly among Black women. Later life cognitive benefit of specific aspects of school context, such as high SES peers and academic rigor, had differential benefit depending on race, ethnicity, and sex.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Plasma N-terminal tau fragment is an amyloid-dependent biomarker in Alzheimer's disease Plasma proteomic biomarkers as mediators or moderators for the association between poor cardiovascular health and white matter microstructural integrity: The UK Biobank study White matter hyperintensities and TDP-43 pathology in Alzheimer's disease Neural deterioration and compensation in visual short-term memory among individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment Neuron-derived extracellular vesicles as a liquid biopsy for brain insulin dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1