Sofia I Hernandez Torres, Nicole W Caldwell, Eric J Snider
{"title":"Evaluation of a Semi-Automated Ultrasound Guidance System for Central Vascular Access.","authors":"Sofia I Hernandez Torres, Nicole W Caldwell, Eric J Snider","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11121271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both military and civilian trauma settings. Oftentimes, the control and treatment of hemorrhage requires central vascular access and well-trained medical personnel. Automated technology is being developed that can lower the skill threshold for life-saving interventions. Here, we conduct independent evaluation testing of one such device, the Vu-Path™ Ultrasound Guidance system, or Vu-Path™. The device was designed to simplify needle insertion using a needle holder that ensures the needle is within the ultrasound field of view during its insertion into tissue, along with guidance lines shown on the user interface. We evaluated the performance of this device in a range of laboratory, animal, and human testing platforms. Overall, the device had a high success rate, achieving an 83% insertion accuracy in live animal testing across both normal and hypotensive blood pressures. Vu-Path™ was faster than manual, ultrasound-guided needle insertion and was nearly 1.5 times quicker for arterial and 2.3 times quicker for venous access. Human usability feedback highlighted that 80% of the participants would use this device for central line placement. Study users noted that the guidance lines and small form factor were useful design features. However, issues were raised regarding the needle insertion angle being too steep, with potential positioning challenges as the needle remains fixed to the ultrasound probe. Regardless, 75% of the participants believed that personnel with any level of clinical background could use the device for central vascular access. Overall, Vu-Path™ performed well across a range of testing situations, and potential design improvements were noted. With adjustments to the device, central vascular access can be made more accessible on battlefields in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both military and civilian trauma settings. Oftentimes, the control and treatment of hemorrhage requires central vascular access and well-trained medical personnel. Automated technology is being developed that can lower the skill threshold for life-saving interventions. Here, we conduct independent evaluation testing of one such device, the Vu-Path™ Ultrasound Guidance system, or Vu-Path™. The device was designed to simplify needle insertion using a needle holder that ensures the needle is within the ultrasound field of view during its insertion into tissue, along with guidance lines shown on the user interface. We evaluated the performance of this device in a range of laboratory, animal, and human testing platforms. Overall, the device had a high success rate, achieving an 83% insertion accuracy in live animal testing across both normal and hypotensive blood pressures. Vu-Path™ was faster than manual, ultrasound-guided needle insertion and was nearly 1.5 times quicker for arterial and 2.3 times quicker for venous access. Human usability feedback highlighted that 80% of the participants would use this device for central line placement. Study users noted that the guidance lines and small form factor were useful design features. However, issues were raised regarding the needle insertion angle being too steep, with potential positioning challenges as the needle remains fixed to the ultrasound probe. Regardless, 75% of the participants believed that personnel with any level of clinical background could use the device for central vascular access. Overall, Vu-Path™ performed well across a range of testing situations, and potential design improvements were noted. With adjustments to the device, central vascular access can be made more accessible on battlefields in the future.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering