{"title":"Progress in 3D Printing Applications for the Management of Orbital Disorders: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Luca Michelutti, Alessandro Tel, Massimo Robiony, Salvatore Sembronio, Riccardo Nocini, Edoardo Agosti, Tamara Ius, Caterina Gagliano, Marco Zeppieri","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11121238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: 3D printing technology has gained considerable interest in the domain of orbital illnesses owing to its capacity to transform diagnosis, surgery planning, and treatment. This systematic review seeks to deliver a thorough examination of the contemporary applications of 3D printing in the treatment of ocular problems, encompassing tumors, injuries, and congenital defects. This systematic review of recent studies has examined the application of patient-specific 3D-printed models for preoperative planning, personalized implants, and prosthetics. <b>Methods</b>: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PICOS is \"What are the current advances and applications of 3D printing for the management of orbital pathology?\" The databases analyzed for the research phase are MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science. <b>Results</b>: Out of 314 studies found in the literature, only 12 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the included studies, it is evident that 3D printing can be a useful technology for the management of trauma and oncological pathologies of the orbital region. <b>Discussion</b>: 3D printing proves to be very useful mainly for the purpose of improving the preoperative planning of a surgical procedure, allowing for better preparation by the surgical team and a reduction in operative time and complications. <b>Conclusions</b>: 3D printing has proven to be an outstanding tool in the management of orbit pathology. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of such technology, the former far outweigh the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: 3D printing technology has gained considerable interest in the domain of orbital illnesses owing to its capacity to transform diagnosis, surgery planning, and treatment. This systematic review seeks to deliver a thorough examination of the contemporary applications of 3D printing in the treatment of ocular problems, encompassing tumors, injuries, and congenital defects. This systematic review of recent studies has examined the application of patient-specific 3D-printed models for preoperative planning, personalized implants, and prosthetics. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PICOS is "What are the current advances and applications of 3D printing for the management of orbital pathology?" The databases analyzed for the research phase are MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Results: Out of 314 studies found in the literature, only 12 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the included studies, it is evident that 3D printing can be a useful technology for the management of trauma and oncological pathologies of the orbital region. Discussion: 3D printing proves to be very useful mainly for the purpose of improving the preoperative planning of a surgical procedure, allowing for better preparation by the surgical team and a reduction in operative time and complications. Conclusions: 3D printing has proven to be an outstanding tool in the management of orbit pathology. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of such technology, the former far outweigh the latter.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering