Jie-Ren Mi Le, Wen-Tien Wu, Chih-Wei Chen, Fu-Shan Jaw, Shu-Hua Yang, Kuang-Ting Yeh
{"title":"Defining a Critical Partition Zone for Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jie-Ren Mi Le, Wen-Tien Wu, Chih-Wei Chen, Fu-Shan Jaw, Shu-Hua Yang, Kuang-Ting Yeh","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11121240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal alignment in the lumbar spine is essential for spinal stability and functionality, with significant implications in surgical planning for spinal deformity correction. However, standardized lumbar partitioning, particularly identifying a critical sagittal alignment zone, remains underdefined. This study aims to establish a reliable lumbar partition to guide surgical decisions and optimize clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of four major biomedical databases yielded 32 studies, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. Studies on asymptomatic adults with segmental lordosis data stratified by pelvic incidence were analyzed. Lumbar lordosis values were converted to percentages, allowing for cross-study comparison. Sensitivity analysis and bias assessment were performed to ensure methodological rigor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings identified the L3-L5 interval, especially around the L4 vertebra, as a critical biomechanical zone across various populations and pelvic incidence groups. Individuals with higher pelvic incidence had concentrated lordosis in lower segments, while those with lower pelvic incidence had greater lordosis in upper segments, underscoring the L3-L5 region's stability as a surgical reference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The L3-L5 interval serves as a key partition zone for sagittal alignment, providing a stable reference for lumbar spine fusion. These findings offer a foundational clinical reference, potentially improving alignment outcomes and reducing postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sagittal alignment in the lumbar spine is essential for spinal stability and functionality, with significant implications in surgical planning for spinal deformity correction. However, standardized lumbar partitioning, particularly identifying a critical sagittal alignment zone, remains underdefined. This study aims to establish a reliable lumbar partition to guide surgical decisions and optimize clinical outcomes.
Methods: A systematic review of four major biomedical databases yielded 32 studies, of which 4 met the inclusion criteria. Studies on asymptomatic adults with segmental lordosis data stratified by pelvic incidence were analyzed. Lumbar lordosis values were converted to percentages, allowing for cross-study comparison. Sensitivity analysis and bias assessment were performed to ensure methodological rigor.
Results: The findings identified the L3-L5 interval, especially around the L4 vertebra, as a critical biomechanical zone across various populations and pelvic incidence groups. Individuals with higher pelvic incidence had concentrated lordosis in lower segments, while those with lower pelvic incidence had greater lordosis in upper segments, underscoring the L3-L5 region's stability as a surgical reference.
Conclusions: The L3-L5 interval serves as a key partition zone for sagittal alignment, providing a stable reference for lumbar spine fusion. These findings offer a foundational clinical reference, potentially improving alignment outcomes and reducing postoperative complications.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering