Employing survival analysis of administrative claims to identify prospective predictors of evidence-based practice sustainment versus provider turnover.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000915
Lauren Brookman-Frazee, Teresa Lind, Mojdeh Motamedi, Joyce H L Lui, Morgan Crawley, Kenny Le, Anna S Lau
{"title":"Employing survival analysis of administrative claims to identify prospective predictors of evidence-based practice sustainment versus provider turnover.","authors":"Lauren Brookman-Frazee, Teresa Lind, Mojdeh Motamedi, Joyce H L Lui, Morgan Crawley, Kenny Le, Anna S Lau","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study described therapists' delivery of six child mental health evidence-based practices (EBPs) over 33 months during the sustainment phase of a system-driven implementation aimed at improving access to EBPs in community settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seven hundred seventy-seven therapists and 162 program leaders delivering at least one of six EBPs of interest completed surveys, and these data were matched to therapist administrative claims data. Survival analyses examined (a) therapists' discontinuation of delivery of all Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health direct client services (i.e., turnover) and (b) therapists' discontinuation of a specific EBP while continuing to provide psychotherapy services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of therapists (58.3%) were observed to discontinue providing any direct client services over the 33-month period, and discontinuation rates for specific EBPs ranged from 100% of therapists (Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools) to 76.4% (Managing and Adapting Practice). Different factors predicted the discontinuation of all service delivery compared to the discontinuation of a specific EBP. Greater therapist emotional exhaustion predicted higher likelihood of discontinuation of all direct client services. For EBP discontinuation, EBP-level factors (e.g., EBPs that required ongoing consultation), therapist-level factors (e.g., ability to provide services in a language other than English), and agency-level factors (e.g., more positive program leader perceptions of the EBP) predicted lower likelihood of discontinuation of the specific EBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different factors contribute to the risk of therapists leaving the service system versus discontinuing the delivery of specific EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 1","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study described therapists' delivery of six child mental health evidence-based practices (EBPs) over 33 months during the sustainment phase of a system-driven implementation aimed at improving access to EBPs in community settings.

Method: Seven hundred seventy-seven therapists and 162 program leaders delivering at least one of six EBPs of interest completed surveys, and these data were matched to therapist administrative claims data. Survival analyses examined (a) therapists' discontinuation of delivery of all Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health direct client services (i.e., turnover) and (b) therapists' discontinuation of a specific EBP while continuing to provide psychotherapy services.

Results: A majority of therapists (58.3%) were observed to discontinue providing any direct client services over the 33-month period, and discontinuation rates for specific EBPs ranged from 100% of therapists (Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools) to 76.4% (Managing and Adapting Practice). Different factors predicted the discontinuation of all service delivery compared to the discontinuation of a specific EBP. Greater therapist emotional exhaustion predicted higher likelihood of discontinuation of all direct client services. For EBP discontinuation, EBP-level factors (e.g., EBPs that required ongoing consultation), therapist-level factors (e.g., ability to provide services in a language other than English), and agency-level factors (e.g., more positive program leader perceptions of the EBP) predicted lower likelihood of discontinuation of the specific EBP.

Conclusions: Different factors contribute to the risk of therapists leaving the service system versus discontinuing the delivery of specific EBPs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用行政索赔的生存分析来确定循证实践维持与提供者更替的前瞻性预测因素。
目的:本研究描述了治疗师在33个月内提供的6个儿童心理健康循证实践(ebp),在系统驱动的实施阶段,旨在改善社区环境中ebp的可及性。方法:777名治疗师和162名项目负责人完成了调查,他们提供了至少一种感兴趣的ebp,这些数据与治疗师行政索赔数据相匹配。生存分析检查了(a)治疗师停止提供所有洛杉矶县心理健康部门的直接客户服务(即营业额)和(b)治疗师在继续提供心理治疗服务的同时停止特定的EBP。结果:大多数治疗师(58.3%)被观察到在33个月期间停止提供任何直接客户服务,特定ebp的中断率从100%的治疗师(学校创伤认知行为干预)到76.4%(管理和适应实践)不等。与特定EBP的终止相比,不同的因素预测了所有服务交付的终止。治疗师情绪耗竭程度越高,终止所有直接客户服务的可能性越高。对于EBP中止,EBP水平因素(例如,需要持续咨询的EBP)、治疗师水平因素(例如,以英语以外的语言提供服务的能力)和机构水平因素(例如,更积极的项目领导对EBP的看法)预测特定EBP中止的可能性较低。结论:不同的因素导致了治疗师离开服务系统和停止提供特定ebp的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of facilitative interpersonal and relational skills training for teletherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Evaluating hypothetical prevention strategies for internalizing symptoms in the general population and at-risk children. Employing survival analysis of administrative claims to identify prospective predictors of evidence-based practice sustainment versus provider turnover. In search of lost time: Discrete- versus continuous-time models of working alliance and symptom severity. Mediators of a randomized controlled trial of a preventive intervention for youth of parents with depressive disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1