A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pain Management in Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S481853
Tianwen Chen, Mingying Li, Yuchen Liu, Xiaoxia Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Jie Li, Miao He, Zhenyuan Wang
{"title":"A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pain Management in Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh.","authors":"Tianwen Chen, Mingying Li, Yuchen Liu, Xiaoxia Zhang, Xiaoli Sun, Jie Li, Miao He, Zhenyuan Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S481853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM were selected and randomly assigned to either the group receiving general anesthesia combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (Group GR, 71 patients) or the group receiving general anesthesia alone (Group G, 68 patients). We monitored the patients' heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at four time points: before anesthesia induction (T1), at the start of surgery (T2), during mesh fixation (T3), and upon removal of the laryngeal mask (T4). Postoperative pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 hour (T5), 6 hours (T6), and 12 hours (T7) after surgery while resting, as well as at 24 hours (T8) during activity. We also compared the number of times the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was pressed and the use of additional analgesics within 24 hours post-surgery, along with recording any adverse reactions and complications associated with RSB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At time points T2 and T3, the HR and MAP in Group GR were significantly lower than those in Group G (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, VAS scores at various postoperative intervals were lower in Group GR, with significant differences noted at T5, T7, and T8 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Group GR also had significantly fewer presses on the analgesia pump within 24 hours post-surgery compared to Group G, while the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided RSB is a straightforward and safe technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM. It offers clear analgesic benefits and significantly reduces early postoperative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S481853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM).

Methods: A total of 139 patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM were selected and randomly assigned to either the group receiving general anesthesia combined with bilateral rectus sheath block (Group GR, 71 patients) or the group receiving general anesthesia alone (Group G, 68 patients). We monitored the patients' heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at four time points: before anesthesia induction (T1), at the start of surgery (T2), during mesh fixation (T3), and upon removal of the laryngeal mask (T4). Postoperative pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 hour (T5), 6 hours (T6), and 12 hours (T7) after surgery while resting, as well as at 24 hours (T8) during activity. We also compared the number of times the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was pressed and the use of additional analgesics within 24 hours post-surgery, along with recording any adverse reactions and complications associated with RSB.

Results: At time points T2 and T3, the HR and MAP in Group GR were significantly lower than those in Group G (P < 0.05). Additionally, VAS scores at various postoperative intervals were lower in Group GR, with significant differences noted at T5, T7, and T8 (P < 0.05). Group GR also had significantly fewer presses on the analgesia pump within 24 hours post-surgery compared to Group G, while the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided RSB is a straightforward and safe technique for laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with IPOM. It offers clear analgesic benefits and significantly reduces early postoperative pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下腹直肌鞘阻滞治疗腹腔内补片腹腔镜脐疝修补疼痛的前瞻性随机对照研究。
目的:评价超声引导下直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)在腹腔内嵌补片(IPOM)腹腔镜脐疝修补术中的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选择行腹腔镜下IPOM脐疝修补术的患者139例,随机分为全麻联合双侧直肌鞘阻滞组(GR组,71例)和单纯全麻组(G组,68例)。我们在麻醉诱导前(T1)、手术开始时(T2)、补片固定时(T3)和取喉罩时(T4)四个时间点监测患者的心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)。术后疼痛水平在术后1小时(T5)、6小时(T6)和12小时(T7)以及活动时24小时(T8)使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。我们还比较了术后24小时内按压患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)泵的次数和使用其他镇痛药的次数,并记录了与RSB相关的任何不良反应和并发症。结果:T2、T3时间点,GR组HR、MAP均显著低于G组(P < 0.05)。此外,GR组术后各时间间隔VAS评分均较低,T5、T7、T8评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与G组相比,GR组术后24小时内对镇痛泵的按压次数也明显减少,两组不良事件发生率相似。结论:超声引导下的RSB是腹腔镜脐疝IPOM修复术中一种简单、安全的技术。它具有明显的镇痛效果,并显著减少术后早期疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Current Evidence and Clinical Implications of Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Post-Vertebroplasty Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Comprehensive Review. The Effectiveness of Fu's Subcutaneous Needling for Residual Pain After Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol [Letter]. Spinal Cord Stimulators' Displacement: Systematic Review and Single-Institution Case Series with Anchoring Technique. Transcriptome Changes of ACC in IBS Rats Induced by Electroacupuncture: Exploration of Mechanism and Clinical Significance [Letter]. A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Combined with Pulsed Radiofrequency in Preventing Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1