Impact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004505
Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley
{"title":"Impact of American College of surgeons trauma verification on statewide collaborative outcomes.","authors":"Eli Mlaver, Elizabeth V Atkins, Regina S Medeiros, Jyotirmay Sharma, Gina Solomon, Luke Galloway, Samual R Todd, James R Dunne, Dennis W Ashley","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center verification has demonstrated improved outcomes at individual centers, but its impact on statewide Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Collaboratives is unknown. A statewide TQIP Collaborative, founded in 2011, noted underperformance in six of eight patient cohorts identified in the TQIP Collaborative report. We hypothesized that requiring ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers would result in improved outcomes for the state collaborative.

Methods: The ACS verification requirement was tied to ongoing Trauma Commission funding. Trauma centers were required to apply for an ACS consultative visit by 2017 and were given until 2023 to achieve ACS verification. The effect of this intervention was measured in the number of centers achieving verification and in the performance of the TQIP Collaborative semiannual reports.

Results: In 2015, only 1 of 15 (7%) trauma centers were ACS verified, and 4 had undergone consultative visits. By 2023, 11 of 12 (92%) trauma centers achieved ACS verification. Following this intervention, the observed-to-expected odds ratio for all-patient morbidity and mortality improved from 1.60 to 1.17, and variation among patient-specific cohorts narrowed from 0.97-1.82 to 0.96-1.48 (Figure 2). Performance in all six underperforming patient-specific cohorts improved over the study period.

Conclusion: ACS verification for level I and II trauma centers improves TQIP Collaborative performance. Statewide Collaboratives should consider ACS verification as a requirement for participation.

Level of evidence: Economic and Value-Based Evaluations, Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国外科医师学会创伤鉴定对全州合作结果的影响。
背景:美国外科医师学会(ACS)创伤中心的验证表明,个别中心的结果有所改善,但其对州范围内创伤质量改善计划(TQIP)合作的影响尚不清楚。2011年成立的一个全州范围的TQIP协作组织指出,在TQIP协作报告中确定的8个患者队列中,有6个表现不佳。我们假设,要求一级和二级创伤中心进行ACS验证将改善国家合作的结果。方法:ACS的验证要求与创伤委员会正在进行的资助有关。创伤中心必须在2017年之前申请ACS咨询访问,并在2023年之前获得ACS认证。这种干预的效果是通过获得验证的中心数量和TQIP合作半年度报告的表现来衡量的。结果:2015年,15家创伤中心中只有1家(7%)被证实为ACS, 4家进行了咨询访问。到2023年,12个创伤中心中有11个(92%)达到了ACS认证。在此干预后,所有患者发病率和死亡率的观察到的与预期的比值比从1.60提高到1.17,患者特异性队列之间的差异从0.97-1.82缩小到0.96-1.48(图2)。在研究期间,所有六个表现不佳的患者特异性队列的表现都有所改善。结论:一级和二级创伤中心的ACS验证提高了TQIP协作绩效。全州协作组织应考虑将ACS验证作为参与的必要条件。证据等级:经济和基于价值的评估,三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers. How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know. Not all call is created equally: The impact of culture and sex on burnout related to in-house call. Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1