Implementation and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity, Interprofessional Simulation Project Using Standardized Patients to Address Aggression in a Psychiatric Emergency Department.

Nancy M Bowllan, Heather Obrien, Courtney Blackwood, Wendi F Cross, Patrick Walsh
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity, Interprofessional Simulation Project Using Standardized Patients to Address Aggression in a Psychiatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Nancy M Bowllan, Heather Obrien, Courtney Blackwood, Wendi F Cross, Patrick Walsh","doi":"10.1177/10783903241308529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increased aggression in a regional Comprehensive Psychiatric Emergency Program (CPEP) led to a significant rise in physical assaults, restraints, and use of security personnel. Root cause analysis revealed a need for more extensive training on de-escalation, teamwork and communication.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This quality improvement project evaluated the impact of an interprofessional, high-fidelity simulation project on interdisciplinary collaboration to manage de-escalation and aggression safely and effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interdisciplinary team members (<i>N</i> = 171 nurses, psychiatrists, social workers, crisis specialists, and safety officers) participated in a 2.5-hr educational initiative that included Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI) and Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) interventions, high-fidelity simulation using standardized patients, observation, and debriefing. Quantitative data collection and analysis included the use of the Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression Instrument (CCPAI), TeamSTEPPS Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ), pre-post data on restraints, injuries, and an educational survey. A qualitative analysis of debriefing themes was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant improvement was noted in individuals' confidence to manage aggression. In addition, data collected over a 5-month period before and after simulation demonstrated a 35% reduction in restraints and a 52% reduction in injuries. Interestingly, quantitative evidence revealed no changes in perceptions of teamwork. Results from the educational survey highlighted the positive impact of standardized patients and debriefing, and gaining new insights into patient care. Qualitative analysis of debriefing themes revealed educational opportunities to improve communication, role clarity, de-escalation, and insights into patient impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of high-fidelity simulation with standardized patients has the potential to strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration to safely manage aggression in an acute psychiatric setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"10783903241308529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903241308529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Increased aggression in a regional Comprehensive Psychiatric Emergency Program (CPEP) led to a significant rise in physical assaults, restraints, and use of security personnel. Root cause analysis revealed a need for more extensive training on de-escalation, teamwork and communication.

Aims: This quality improvement project evaluated the impact of an interprofessional, high-fidelity simulation project on interdisciplinary collaboration to manage de-escalation and aggression safely and effectively.

Methods: Interdisciplinary team members (N = 171 nurses, psychiatrists, social workers, crisis specialists, and safety officers) participated in a 2.5-hr educational initiative that included Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI) and Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) interventions, high-fidelity simulation using standardized patients, observation, and debriefing. Quantitative data collection and analysis included the use of the Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression Instrument (CCPAI), TeamSTEPPS Perception Questionnaire (T-TPQ), pre-post data on restraints, injuries, and an educational survey. A qualitative analysis of debriefing themes was also performed.

Results: Statistically significant improvement was noted in individuals' confidence to manage aggression. In addition, data collected over a 5-month period before and after simulation demonstrated a 35% reduction in restraints and a 52% reduction in injuries. Interestingly, quantitative evidence revealed no changes in perceptions of teamwork. Results from the educational survey highlighted the positive impact of standardized patients and debriefing, and gaining new insights into patient care. Qualitative analysis of debriefing themes revealed educational opportunities to improve communication, role clarity, de-escalation, and insights into patient impact.

Conclusion: The use of high-fidelity simulation with standardized patients has the potential to strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration to safely manage aggression in an acute psychiatric setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施和评估高保真,跨专业模拟项目使用标准化的病人来解决精神科急诊科的攻击行为。
简介:区域性综合精神病学急诊项目(CPEP)中攻击性的增加导致人身攻击、约束和使用安全人员的显著增加。根本原因分析显示,需要在降级、团队合作和沟通方面进行更广泛的培训。目的:本质量改进项目评估了一个跨专业、高保真仿真项目对跨学科协作的影响,以安全有效地管理降级和侵略。方法:跨学科团队成员(N = 171名护士、精神科医生、社会工作者、危机专家和安全官员)参加了2.5小时的教育活动,包括危机预防干预(CPI)和提高绩效和患者安全的团队策略和工具(TeamSTEPPS)干预,采用标准化患者的高保真模拟,观察和汇报。定量数据收集和分析包括使用应对患者攻击的信心量表(CCPAI)、TeamSTEPPS感知问卷(T-TPQ)、约束、伤害的前后数据和一项教育调查。还对汇报主题进行了定性分析。结果:个体管理攻击行为的信心显著提高。此外,在模拟前后5个月期间收集的数据表明,束缚减少了35%,受伤减少了52%。有趣的是,定量证据显示,人们对团队合作的看法没有变化。教育调查的结果强调了标准化患者和汇报的积极影响,并获得了对患者护理的新见解。对述职主题的定性分析揭示了改善沟通、角色清晰度、降级和了解患者影响的教育机会。结论:在标准化患者中使用高保真度模拟有可能加强跨学科合作,以安全管理急性精神病患者的攻击行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Implementation and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity, Interprofessional Simulation Project Using Standardized Patients to Address Aggression in a Psychiatric Emergency Department. Evaluating De-Escalation Training for Direct and Indirect Employees Caring for Residents With Huntington's Disease. Home Health Nurses' Perceptions of Caring for Persons With Severe and Persistent Mental Illnesses. Self-Defense Training to Reduce Violence Against Women and Girls: An Integrative Review. Interactions Between Serotonin Transporter Gene and Adverse Childhood Experience in a Generalized Additive Model: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1