{"title":"The effects of variable spatial aggregation on lymphatic filariasis transmission.","authors":"Callum Shaw, Angus McLure, Kathryn Glass","doi":"10.1186/s13071-024-06582-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a World Health Organization goal, with several countries at or near prevalence thresholds. Where LF cases remain after mass drug administration, they tend to be spatially clustered, with an overdispersed individual worm burden. Both individual and spatial heterogeneities can cause aggregation of infection; however, few studies have investigated the drivers of heterogeneity and implications for disease elimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a spatially explicit lymphatic filariasis model to investigate LF transmission in American Samoa at three spatial scales - a territory-level model, a village model with 64 groups and a subvillage model with 316 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To reproduce American Samoan survey data, models with less spatial structure required increased individual-level bite aggregation. Threshold behaviour was present in the territory model but less evident in the models with spatial structure. As such, mass drug administration was most effective in the territory model, while in the spatially structured models, successive rounds of mass drug administration only gradually increased the likelihood of elimination. With the addition of spatial structure, residual infections remained in limited groups, and infection resurgence was slowed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the impacts on potential intervention and surveillance strategies, it is critical that studies incorporate individual and spatial sources of heterogeneity to accurately model transmission and inform potential policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"18 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06582-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Elimination of lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a World Health Organization goal, with several countries at or near prevalence thresholds. Where LF cases remain after mass drug administration, they tend to be spatially clustered, with an overdispersed individual worm burden. Both individual and spatial heterogeneities can cause aggregation of infection; however, few studies have investigated the drivers of heterogeneity and implications for disease elimination.
Methods: We used a spatially explicit lymphatic filariasis model to investigate LF transmission in American Samoa at three spatial scales - a territory-level model, a village model with 64 groups and a subvillage model with 316 groups.
Results: To reproduce American Samoan survey data, models with less spatial structure required increased individual-level bite aggregation. Threshold behaviour was present in the territory model but less evident in the models with spatial structure. As such, mass drug administration was most effective in the territory model, while in the spatially structured models, successive rounds of mass drug administration only gradually increased the likelihood of elimination. With the addition of spatial structure, residual infections remained in limited groups, and infection resurgence was slowed.
Conclusions: Due to the impacts on potential intervention and surveillance strategies, it is critical that studies incorporate individual and spatial sources of heterogeneity to accurately model transmission and inform potential policy decisions.
期刊介绍:
Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish.
Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.