Predicting clinical outcomes in a blended care intervention for early psychosis: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily-Life (ACT-DL).

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Translational Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1038/s41398-024-03214-1
Rafaël A Bonnier, Joanne R Beames, Glenn Kiekens, Evelyne van Aubel, Frederike Schirmbeck, Lieuwe de Haan, Machteld Marcelis, Mark van der Gaag, Ruud van Winkel, Therese van Amelsvoort, Thomas Vaessen, Ulrich Reininghaus, Ginette Lafit, Inez Myin-Germeys
{"title":"Predicting clinical outcomes in a blended care intervention for early psychosis: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily-Life (ACT-DL).","authors":"Rafaël A Bonnier, Joanne R Beames, Glenn Kiekens, Evelyne van Aubel, Frederike Schirmbeck, Lieuwe de Haan, Machteld Marcelis, Mark van der Gaag, Ruud van Winkel, Therese van Amelsvoort, Thomas Vaessen, Ulrich Reininghaus, Ginette Lafit, Inez Myin-Germeys","doi":"10.1038/s41398-024-03214-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ACT in Daily Life (ACT-DL) is a blended-care Ecological Momentary Intervention that extends ACT into the daily life of individuals, improving psychotic distress, negative symptoms, and global functioning. However, it remains unclear whether ACT-DL works equally for everyone. We investigated whether moderators (i.e., sociodemographic information, personality, and trauma history) determine clinical outcomes in individuals with early psychosis receiving ACT-DL. Seventy-one participants from the INTERACT trial, using ACT-DL, were analyzed. Outcomes included psychotic distress, negative symptoms, global functioning, and psychological flexibility. Using multivariate-multilevel models, we evaluated the effects of sociodemographics, personality, and childhood trauma across baseline, post-intervention, and six- and 12-month follow-ups. Sociodemographic characteristics and personality predicted clinical outcomes. Higher education demonstrated more substantial improvement in global functioning at 6- (B = 7.43, p = 0.04) and 12-FU (B = 10.74, p = 0.002) compared to lower education. Higher extraversion showed less improvement in negative symptoms at 12-FU (B = 1.24, p = 0.01) and more improvement in global functioning at post-intervention (B = 0.39, p = 0.046) and 6-FU (B = 1.40, p = 0.02) compared to lower extraversion. Higher negative affectivity showed more improvement in negative symptoms at 12-FU (B = -1.59, p = 0.001) and higher psychological flexibility at 12-FU (B = 8.38, p = 0.001) compared to lower negative affectivity. Our findings suggest that while ACT-DL improves clinical outcomes in individuals with early psychosis, the improvement rate is dissimilar for individuals and predictable by baseline characteristics. If replicated, these findings enable precision medicine approaches in allocating ACT-DL for early psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03214-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ACT in Daily Life (ACT-DL) is a blended-care Ecological Momentary Intervention that extends ACT into the daily life of individuals, improving psychotic distress, negative symptoms, and global functioning. However, it remains unclear whether ACT-DL works equally for everyone. We investigated whether moderators (i.e., sociodemographic information, personality, and trauma history) determine clinical outcomes in individuals with early psychosis receiving ACT-DL. Seventy-one participants from the INTERACT trial, using ACT-DL, were analyzed. Outcomes included psychotic distress, negative symptoms, global functioning, and psychological flexibility. Using multivariate-multilevel models, we evaluated the effects of sociodemographics, personality, and childhood trauma across baseline, post-intervention, and six- and 12-month follow-ups. Sociodemographic characteristics and personality predicted clinical outcomes. Higher education demonstrated more substantial improvement in global functioning at 6- (B = 7.43, p = 0.04) and 12-FU (B = 10.74, p = 0.002) compared to lower education. Higher extraversion showed less improvement in negative symptoms at 12-FU (B = 1.24, p = 0.01) and more improvement in global functioning at post-intervention (B = 0.39, p = 0.046) and 6-FU (B = 1.40, p = 0.02) compared to lower extraversion. Higher negative affectivity showed more improvement in negative symptoms at 12-FU (B = -1.59, p = 0.001) and higher psychological flexibility at 12-FU (B = 8.38, p = 0.001) compared to lower negative affectivity. Our findings suggest that while ACT-DL improves clinical outcomes in individuals with early psychosis, the improvement rate is dissimilar for individuals and predictable by baseline characteristics. If replicated, these findings enable precision medicine approaches in allocating ACT-DL for early psychosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测早期精神病混合护理干预的临床结果:日常生活中的接受和承诺治疗(ACT-DL)。
日常生活中的ACT (ACT- dl)是一种混合护理生态瞬时干预,将ACT扩展到个体的日常生活中,改善精神病困扰,阴性症状和整体功能。然而,目前尚不清楚ACT-DL是否对每个人都有效。我们调查了调节因子(即社会人口统计学信息、个性和创伤史)是否决定了接受ACT-DL治疗的早期精神病患者的临床结果。使用ACT-DL对来自INTERACT试验的71名参与者进行了分析。结果包括精神病性痛苦、阴性症状、整体功能和心理灵活性。使用多变量-多水平模型,我们评估了基线、干预后以及6个月和12个月随访期间社会人口统计学、个性和童年创伤的影响。社会人口学特征和人格预测临床结果。与低教育相比,高等教育在6- (B = 7.43, p = 0.04)和12-FU (B = 10.74, p = 0.002)方面表现出更大的改善。与低外向性相比,高外向性在12 fu时阴性症状的改善较少(B = 1.24, p = 0.01),而在干预后的整体功能改善较多(B = 0.39, p = 0.046)和6 fu时(B = 1.40, p = 0.02)。与较低的负性情感相比,较高的负性情感在12-FU时表现出更多的消极症状改善(B = -1.59, p = 0.001)和较高的心理灵活性(B = 8.38, p = 0.001)。我们的研究结果表明,虽然ACT-DL改善了早期精神病患者的临床结果,但不同个体的改善率不同,并且可以通过基线特征来预测。如果重复,这些发现将使精准医学方法在分配ACT-DL用于早期精神病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Brain-wide pleiotropy investigation of alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking behaviors. Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population. PSMB4: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for depression, perspective from integration analysis of depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome. Text mining of outpatient narrative notes to predict the risk of psychiatric hospitalization. Common and disease-specific patterns of functional connectivity and topology alterations across unipolar and bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a transdiagnostic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1