[Efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of adult patients with acute severe asthma: a Meta-analysis].

Zhimei Zhong, Zengrui Wang, Sheng Qi, Chaoqian Li, Xia Yang
{"title":"[Efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of adult patients with acute severe asthma: a Meta-analysis].","authors":"Zhimei Zhong, Zengrui Wang, Sheng Qi, Chaoqian Li, Xia Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240617-00514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases to screen randomized controlled trial (RCT) of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults, starting from the establishment of the database and ending on May 22, 2024. The control group received conventional treatment. The observation group was given intravenous magnesium sulfate on the basis of routine treatment. The outcome indexes included total effective rate, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and other pulmonary function indexes, and incidence of adverse reactions. The selection of relevant literature, the collection of data needed for the study and the risk assessment of bias in the included study were all conducted independently by 2 researchers. Stata 12.0 software was used for Meta-analysis, and funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen RCT studies with a total of 2 601 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.03-1.20, P = 0.008]. In pulmonary function examination, PEF [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.70, 95%CI was 0.24-1.15, P = 0.003], FEV1 (WMD = 0.48, 95%CI was 0.29-0.68, P = 0.000) and FVC (WMD = 0.72, 95%CI was 0.47-0.97, P = 0.000) were significantly better than those in the control group. There was no significantly difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (RR = 0.51, 95%CI was 0.17-1.55, P = 0.419). The funnel plot was drawn for the total effective rate, which showed that each study presented a symmetrical distribution, and the Begg's test (Z = 1.31, P = 0.189) and Egger's test (t = 1.18, P = 0.261) were combined to consider the small possibility of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence shows that the use of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults increases the total response rate and improves lung function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies high-quality studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"36 12","pages":"1256-1260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240617-00514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults.

Methods: Literature searches were conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases to screen randomized controlled trial (RCT) of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults, starting from the establishment of the database and ending on May 22, 2024. The control group received conventional treatment. The observation group was given intravenous magnesium sulfate on the basis of routine treatment. The outcome indexes included total effective rate, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and other pulmonary function indexes, and incidence of adverse reactions. The selection of relevant literature, the collection of data needed for the study and the risk assessment of bias in the included study were all conducted independently by 2 researchers. Stata 12.0 software was used for Meta-analysis, and funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results: Sixteen RCT studies with a total of 2 601 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.03-1.20, P = 0.008]. In pulmonary function examination, PEF [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.70, 95%CI was 0.24-1.15, P = 0.003], FEV1 (WMD = 0.48, 95%CI was 0.29-0.68, P = 0.000) and FVC (WMD = 0.72, 95%CI was 0.47-0.97, P = 0.000) were significantly better than those in the control group. There was no significantly difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (RR = 0.51, 95%CI was 0.17-1.55, P = 0.419). The funnel plot was drawn for the total effective rate, which showed that each study presented a symmetrical distribution, and the Begg's test (Z = 1.31, P = 0.189) and Egger's test (t = 1.18, P = 0.261) were combined to consider the small possibility of publication bias.

Conclusions: Current evidence shows that the use of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute severe asthma in adults increases the total response rate and improves lung function without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality studies high-quality studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[硫酸镁治疗成人急性重症哮喘的疗效和安全性:meta分析]。
目的:评价硫酸镁治疗成人急性重症哮喘的疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane、CNKI、VIP、万方等数据库的文献,筛选硫酸镁治疗成人急性重症哮喘的随机对照试验(RCT),从数据库建立开始,截止到2024年5月22日。对照组给予常规治疗。观察组患者在常规治疗的基础上静脉注射硫酸镁。结局指标包括总有效率、呼气峰流量(PEF)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)等肺功能指标及不良反应发生率。相关文献的选择、研究所需资料的收集以及纳入研究的偏倚风险评估均由2名研究者独立完成。meta分析采用Stata 12.0软件,发表偏倚评价采用漏斗图。结果:16项RCT研究共纳入2 601例患者。meta分析结果显示,观察组总有效率显著高于对照组[风险比(RR) = 1.11, 95%可信区间(95% ci)为1.03 ~ 1.20,P = 0.008]。肺功能检查中,PEF[加权平均差值(WMD) = 0.70, 95%CI为0.24 ~ 1.15,P = 0.003]、FEV1 (WMD = 0.48, 95%CI为0.29 ~ 0.68,P = 0.000)、FVC (WMD = 0.72, 95%CI为0.47 ~ 0.97,P = 0.000)均显著优于对照组。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(RR = 0.51, 95%CI为0.17 ~ 1.55,P = 0.419)。总有效率绘制漏斗图,各研究均呈对称分布,并结合Begg检验(Z = 1.31, P = 0.189)和Egger检验(t = 1.18, P = 0.261)考虑发表偏倚的可能性较小。结论:目前有证据表明,使用硫酸镁治疗成人急性重症哮喘可提高总有效率,改善肺功能,但不增加不良反应的发生率。由于纳入的研究数量和质量有限,上述结论需要更多高质量的研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Construction of prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury treated with continuous renal replacement therapy]. [Effect of extra corporeal reducing pre-load on pulmonary mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome]. [Efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of adult patients with acute severe asthma: a Meta-analysis]. [Efficiency analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study]. [Establishment of risk prediction model for pneumonia infection in elderly severe patients and analysis of prevention effect of 1M3S nursing plan under early warning mode].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1