[Predictive value of plasma heparin-binding protein combined with albumin for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis].

Jiangping Liu, Yajun Li, Yawen Zheng, Cuijie Zhang, Lihua Huang, Xiaopeng Ning, Wenfei Wang, Qingli Dou
{"title":"[Predictive value of plasma heparin-binding protein combined with albumin for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis].","authors":"Jiangping Liu, Yajun Li, Yawen Zheng, Cuijie Zhang, Lihua Huang, Xiaopeng Ning, Wenfei Wang, Qingli Dou","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240718-00614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of plasma heparin-binding protein (HBP) combined with albumin (Alb) for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of patients with sepsis admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of the People's Hospital of Shenzhen Baoan District from March 2020 to March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The study began at the time of the first diagnosis of sepsis upon EICU admission and ended upon patient death or at 28 days. The gender, age, length of stay in EICU, underlying diseases, and infection sites were recorded. Within 24 hours of sepsis diagnosis, blood culture results, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), blood lactate acid (Lac), HBP, Alb, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mortality in emergency department sepsis score (MEDS), modified early warning score (MEWS), number of organ failures, use of vasopressors, application of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and 28-day prognosis were recorded, the differences in these indicators between two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the risk factors of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the early predictive value of various risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 300 patients with sepsis were included, with 16 excluded, resulting in 284 patients being analyzed. Among them, 191 survived and 93 died within 28 days. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, underlying diseases, infection sites, blood culture positivity rate, number of organ failures, and length of stay in EICU. Univariate analysis showed that the rate of vasopressor use, the rate of mechanical ventilation, HBP, PCT, CRP, Lac, SOFA score, APACHE II score, MEDS score, and MEWS score were significantly higher in the death group than those in the survival group, while Alb was significantly lower in the death group than that in the survival group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that HBP and Alb were independent risk factors for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were 1.093 (0.989-1.128) and 1.174 (1.095-1.259), both P < 0.05]. ROC curve analysis showed that both HBP and Alb had certain predictive value for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis [AUC and 95%CI were 0.820 (0.717-0.923) and 0.786 (0.682-0.890), both P < 0.05]. When the critical value of HBP was 117.50 μg/L, the sensitivity was 85.90%, and the specificity was 70.50%. When the critical value of Alb was 28.30 g/L, the sensitivity was 69.30%, and the specificity was 81.20%. When the two indexes were combined for diagnosis, the AUC was 0.881 (95%CI was 0.817-0.945, P < 0.001), the sensitivity was 92.70%, and the specificity was 76.80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HBP and Alb are independent risk factors for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The combined prediction efficiency of HBP and Alb for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis is superior to a single indicator.</p>","PeriodicalId":24079,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","volume":"36 12","pages":"1233-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240718-00614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of plasma heparin-binding protein (HBP) combined with albumin (Alb) for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods: The clinical data of patients with sepsis admitted to the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) of the People's Hospital of Shenzhen Baoan District from March 2020 to March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The study began at the time of the first diagnosis of sepsis upon EICU admission and ended upon patient death or at 28 days. The gender, age, length of stay in EICU, underlying diseases, and infection sites were recorded. Within 24 hours of sepsis diagnosis, blood culture results, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), blood lactate acid (Lac), HBP, Alb, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), mortality in emergency department sepsis score (MEDS), modified early warning score (MEWS), number of organ failures, use of vasopressors, application of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and 28-day prognosis were recorded, the differences in these indicators between two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the risk factors of 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the early predictive value of various risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

Results: A total of 300 patients with sepsis were included, with 16 excluded, resulting in 284 patients being analyzed. Among them, 191 survived and 93 died within 28 days. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, underlying diseases, infection sites, blood culture positivity rate, number of organ failures, and length of stay in EICU. Univariate analysis showed that the rate of vasopressor use, the rate of mechanical ventilation, HBP, PCT, CRP, Lac, SOFA score, APACHE II score, MEDS score, and MEWS score were significantly higher in the death group than those in the survival group, while Alb was significantly lower in the death group than that in the survival group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that HBP and Alb were independent risk factors for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were 1.093 (0.989-1.128) and 1.174 (1.095-1.259), both P < 0.05]. ROC curve analysis showed that both HBP and Alb had certain predictive value for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis [AUC and 95%CI were 0.820 (0.717-0.923) and 0.786 (0.682-0.890), both P < 0.05]. When the critical value of HBP was 117.50 μg/L, the sensitivity was 85.90%, and the specificity was 70.50%. When the critical value of Alb was 28.30 g/L, the sensitivity was 69.30%, and the specificity was 81.20%. When the two indexes were combined for diagnosis, the AUC was 0.881 (95%CI was 0.817-0.945, P < 0.001), the sensitivity was 92.70%, and the specificity was 76.80%.

Conclusions: HBP and Alb are independent risk factors for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The combined prediction efficiency of HBP and Alb for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis is superior to a single indicator.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[血浆肝素结合蛋白联合白蛋白对败血症患者28天死亡率的预测价值]。
目的:探讨血浆肝素结合蛋白(HBP)联合白蛋白(Alb)对脓毒症患者28天死亡率的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析深圳市宝安区人民医院急诊重症监护室(EICU) 2020年3月至2024年3月收治的脓毒症患者的临床资料。该研究从EICU入院时首次诊断败血症开始,并在患者死亡或28天结束。记录性别、年龄、在EICU的住院时间、基础疾病和感染部位。脓毒症诊断24小时内,血培养结果、白细胞计数(WBC)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、血乳酸(Lac)、HBP、Alb、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理和慢性健康评估II (APACHE II)、急诊科脓毒症评分(MEDS)死亡率、改良早期预警评分(MEWS)、器官衰竭数量、血管升压药物的使用、机械通气的应用、肾脏替代治疗、记录28天预后,比较两组患者上述指标的差异。采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析脓毒症患者28天死亡率的危险因素。绘制受试者操作者特征曲线(Receiver operator characteristic curve, ROC曲线),计算ROC曲线下面积(area under ROC curve, AUC),评价各种危险因素对脓毒症患者28天死亡率的早期预测价值。结果:共纳入脓毒症患者300例,排除16例,共分析284例患者。其中191人存活,93人在28天内死亡。两组患者在性别、年龄、基础疾病、感染部位、血培养阳性率、器官衰竭次数、EICU住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义。单因素分析显示,死亡组血管加压剂使用率、机械通气率、HBP、PCT、CRP、Lac、SOFA评分、APACHE II评分、MEDS评分、MEWS评分显著高于生存组,Alb显著低于生存组。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,HBP和Alb是预测脓毒症患者28天死亡率的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)为1.093(0.989 ~ 1.128),95%可信区间(95% ci)为1.174 (1.095 ~ 1.259),P均< 0.05]。ROC曲线分析显示,HBP和Alb对脓毒症患者28天死亡率有一定的预测价值[AUC和95%CI分别为0.820(0.717-0.923)和0.786 (0.682-0.890),P均< 0.05]。当HBP临界值为117.50 μg/L时,敏感性为85.90%,特异性为70.50%。当Alb临界值为28.30 g/L时,敏感性为69.30%,特异性为81.20%。两指标联合诊断时,AUC为0.881 (95%CI为0.817 ~ 0.945,P < 0.001),敏感性为92.70%,特异性为76.80%。结论:HBP和Alb是预测脓毒症患者28天死亡率的独立危险因素。HBP和Alb对脓毒症患者28天死亡率的联合预测效率优于单一指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
[Construction of prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury treated with continuous renal replacement therapy]. [Effect of extra corporeal reducing pre-load on pulmonary mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome]. [Efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of adult patients with acute severe asthma: a Meta-analysis]. [Efficiency analysis of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study]. [Establishment of risk prediction model for pneumonia infection in elderly severe patients and analysis of prevention effect of 1M3S nursing plan under early warning mode].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1