Effects of short-term, high-dose cocoa-derived flavanol supplementation on gut microbiota composition: secondary findings from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.
Cassandra Suther, Billie Alba, Beau R Yurkevicius, Patrick N Radcliffe, Heather S Fagnant, John Castellani, J Philip Karl
{"title":"Effects of short-term, high-dose cocoa-derived flavanol supplementation on gut microbiota composition: secondary findings from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.","authors":"Cassandra Suther, Billie Alba, Beau R Yurkevicius, Patrick N Radcliffe, Heather S Fagnant, John Castellani, J Philip Karl","doi":"10.1017/jns.2024.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cocoa-derived flavanols (CDF) may act as prebiotics. However, evidence is inconsistent, and the duration and dose of CDF intake needed to elicit any prebiotic effect are undefined. This randomized, double-blind, crossover study determined the effects of short-term, high-dose dietary supplementation with CDF versus matched placebo on gut microbiota composition in 8 healthy adults. A single faecal sample was collected 8 d after supplementation with 900 mg/d CDF or placebo. Gut microbiota composition and <i>Bifidobacterium</i> spp. and <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. abundance were measured as secondary outcomes by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) amplicon sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. No between-treatment differences in the relative or absolute abundance of <i>Bifidobacterium</i> spp. (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.89, <i>P</i> = 0.22) or <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.42, <i>P</i> = 0.65) were detected. Shannon diversity (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and overall community richness (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.34, <i>P</i> = 0.06) were lower following CDF supplementation versus placebo, but no between-treatment differences in β-diversity or taxa relative abundances were observed. Findings are not consistent with a clear prebiotic effect of this short-term, high-dose CDF supplementation strategy relative to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":47536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutritional Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"e22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutritional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cocoa-derived flavanols (CDF) may act as prebiotics. However, evidence is inconsistent, and the duration and dose of CDF intake needed to elicit any prebiotic effect are undefined. This randomized, double-blind, crossover study determined the effects of short-term, high-dose dietary supplementation with CDF versus matched placebo on gut microbiota composition in 8 healthy adults. A single faecal sample was collected 8 d after supplementation with 900 mg/d CDF or placebo. Gut microbiota composition and Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. abundance were measured as secondary outcomes by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) amplicon sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. No between-treatment differences in the relative or absolute abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. (Cohen's d = 0.89, P = 0.22) or Lactobacillus spp. (Cohen's d = 0.42, P = 0.65) were detected. Shannon diversity (Cohen's d = 0.38, P = 0.04) and overall community richness (Cohen's d = 0.34, P = 0.06) were lower following CDF supplementation versus placebo, but no between-treatment differences in β-diversity or taxa relative abundances were observed. Findings are not consistent with a clear prebiotic effect of this short-term, high-dose CDF supplementation strategy relative to placebo.
可可衍生黄烷醇(CDF)可作为益生元。然而,证据是不一致的,CDF摄入的持续时间和剂量是否会引起任何益生元效应尚不明确。这项随机、双盲、交叉研究确定了短期、高剂量膳食补充CDF与匹配安慰剂对8名健康成年人肠道微生物群组成的影响。在补充900 mg/d CDF或安慰剂后8 d收集单个粪便样本。次要结果分别采用16S核糖体核糖核酸(rRNA)扩增子测序和定量聚合酶链反应测定肠道菌群组成和双歧杆菌和乳杆菌丰度。双歧杆菌(Cohen’s d = 0.89, P = 0.22)和乳酸杆菌(Cohen’s d = 0.42, P = 0.65)的相对丰度和绝对丰度在处理间无差异。与安慰剂相比,添加CDF后香农多样性(Cohen’s d = 0.38, P = 0.04)和总体群落丰富度(Cohen’s d = 0.34, P = 0.06)降低,但β多样性和分类群相对丰度在处理间无差异。与安慰剂相比,这种短期、高剂量的CDF补充策略并不具有明确的益生元效应。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nutritional Science is an international, peer-reviewed, online only, open access journal that welcomes high-quality research articles in all aspects of nutrition. The underlying aim of all work should be, as far as possible, to develop nutritional concepts. JNS encompasses the full spectrum of nutritional science including public health nutrition, epidemiology, dietary surveys, nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, appetite, obesity, ageing, endocrinology, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics, molecular and cellular biology and nutrigenomics. JNS welcomes Primary Research Papers, Brief Reports, Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Workshop Reports, Letters to the Editor and Obituaries.