Influence of lens thickness on the accommodative range in healthy eyes.

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528
Louise Vermeulen, Carina Koppen, Luc Van Os, Barbara K Pierscionek, Jos J Rozema
{"title":"Influence of lens thickness on the accommodative range in healthy eyes.","authors":"Louise Vermeulen, Carina Koppen, Luc Van Os, Barbara K Pierscionek, Jos J Rozema","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The maximum accommodative range is a useful indication of visual function. It decreases with age, but the exact cause of this decrease is not fully understood. It is associated with the increasing rigidity of the lens and changes to the lens shape, as well as the geometry of the zonular attachments. This work aims to determine the relationship between the accommodative range and lens shape in a group of healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 40 emmetropic participants between 20 and 30 years of age. They filled in a questionnaire and underwent accommodation measurements using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. After a drop of Tropicamide 0.5 % and Cyclopentolate 1 %, participants underwent measurements with autorefractor, Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus), anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography and optical biometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accommodative range did not correlate significantly (p>0.05) with any of the lenticular or ocular parameters considered, such as lens thickness, lens radii of curvature, axial length, or corneal power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The crystalline lens shape does not affect the accommodative range of the eye. This may be due to the smaller deformation required to bring a thicker lens to the same level of accommodation as a thinner lens. The amount of force on the zonular fibres may therefore be similar, in all lenses, regardless of the lens shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 1","pages":"100528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The maximum accommodative range is a useful indication of visual function. It decreases with age, but the exact cause of this decrease is not fully understood. It is associated with the increasing rigidity of the lens and changes to the lens shape, as well as the geometry of the zonular attachments. This work aims to determine the relationship between the accommodative range and lens shape in a group of healthy young adults.

Methods: This study includes 40 emmetropic participants between 20 and 30 years of age. They filled in a questionnaire and underwent accommodation measurements using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. After a drop of Tropicamide 0.5 % and Cyclopentolate 1 %, participants underwent measurements with autorefractor, Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus), anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography and optical biometry.

Results: The accommodative range did not correlate significantly (p>0.05) with any of the lenticular or ocular parameters considered, such as lens thickness, lens radii of curvature, axial length, or corneal power.

Conclusion: The crystalline lens shape does not affect the accommodative range of the eye. This may be due to the smaller deformation required to bring a thicker lens to the same level of accommodation as a thinner lens. The amount of force on the zonular fibres may therefore be similar, in all lenses, regardless of the lens shape.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晶状体厚度对健康眼调节范围的影响。
背景:最大调节范围是一种有用的视觉功能指标。它随着年龄的增长而减少,但这种减少的确切原因尚不完全清楚。它与晶状体的刚性增加和晶状体形状的变化以及带状附件的几何形状有关。这项工作旨在确定一组健康的年轻人的调节范围和晶状体形状之间的关系。方法:本研究包括40名年龄在20 - 30岁之间的非斜视患者。他们填写了一份调查问卷,并使用RAF收敛规则和负透镜测试进行了适应性测量。在滴入0.5%的Tropicamide和1%的Cyclopentolate后,参与者接受了自折射仪、Scheimpflug断层扫描(Pentacam HR, Oculus)、前段光学相干断层扫描和光学生物测量。结果:调节范围与晶状体或眼参数,如晶状体厚度、晶状体曲率半径、晶状体轴长或角膜度数均无显著相关性(p>0.05)。结论:晶状体的形状不影响眼睛的调节范围。这可能是由于使较厚的透镜达到与较薄透镜相同的调节水平所需的较小变形。因此,无论晶状体的形状如何,所有的晶状体对带状纤维的作用力都是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Real-world outcomes on myopia management efficacy of diverse segmented defocus optics (DSDO) and defocus incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in Chinese children: An initial 12-month prospective clinical study. The correlation between relative peripheral refraction and myopia progression: A commentary on the utility of retinoscopy for peripheral refraction assessment. Comment on: "Mean cycloplegic refractive error in emmetropic adults: The Tehran eye study". Influence of lens thickness on the accommodative range in healthy eyes. Blue light stimulation of the optic nerve head reduces melatonin levels in rabbit posterior segment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1