{"title":"Outcomes Associated With Care Models for Neonates With Complex Medical Needs: A Scoping Review to Support Program Evaluation.","authors":"Nicole Loewen, Manon Ranger, Emily Kieran","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonates with complex medical needs (NCMNs) are a small proportion of neonatal intensive care unit admissions but are high healthcare utilizers. Since 2018, NCMNs at our hospital have been cared for by the Neonatal Complex Care Team. This model has yet to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To inform the evaluation of our care model, we examined literature on care practices for the management of NCMNs and utilized that to define outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched. Inclusion dates: January 1, 1993, until July 15, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was used. The population was neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, the concept was models of care, and the context was medical complexity. Two reviewers performed the title/abstract screening and full-text review. A total of 148 articles were screened, 17 fully reviewed, and 5 articles included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data extraction was completed by one reviewer utilizing resources from the Joanna Briggs Institute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Care practices ranged from structured discharge meetings with families to an inpatient care model. Few reported new clinical models, and long-term health outcome data were limited. Multidisciplinary care teams emerged as crucial to in-hospital care and smooth discharge. Length of stay and readmission were identified as key outcomes for clinical program evaluation.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>There is limited literature on this topic; however, we identified themes and outcomes that are useful for clinical program evaluation. Long-term evaluation of novel models of care is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neonates with complex medical needs (NCMNs) are a small proportion of neonatal intensive care unit admissions but are high healthcare utilizers. Since 2018, NCMNs at our hospital have been cared for by the Neonatal Complex Care Team. This model has yet to be evaluated.
Purpose: To inform the evaluation of our care model, we examined literature on care practices for the management of NCMNs and utilized that to define outcome measures.
Data sources: MEDLINE and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched. Inclusion dates: January 1, 1993, until July 15, 2023.
Study selection: The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was used. The population was neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit, the concept was models of care, and the context was medical complexity. Two reviewers performed the title/abstract screening and full-text review. A total of 148 articles were screened, 17 fully reviewed, and 5 articles included.
Data extraction: Data extraction was completed by one reviewer utilizing resources from the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Results: Care practices ranged from structured discharge meetings with families to an inpatient care model. Few reported new clinical models, and long-term health outcome data were limited. Multidisciplinary care teams emerged as crucial to in-hospital care and smooth discharge. Length of stay and readmission were identified as key outcomes for clinical program evaluation.
Implications for practice and research: There is limited literature on this topic; however, we identified themes and outcomes that are useful for clinical program evaluation. Long-term evaluation of novel models of care is needed.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features.
Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.