Antimicrobial Resistance in African Great Apes.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13121140
Coch Tanguy Floyde Tanga, Patrice Makouloutou-Nzassi, Pierre Philippe Mbehang Nguema, Ariane Düx, Silas Lendzele Sevidzem, Jacques François Mavoungou, Fabian H Leendertz, Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema
{"title":"Antimicrobial Resistance in African Great Apes.","authors":"Coch Tanguy Floyde Tanga, Patrice Makouloutou-Nzassi, Pierre Philippe Mbehang Nguema, Ariane Düx, Silas Lendzele Sevidzem, Jacques François Mavoungou, Fabian H Leendertz, Rodrigue Mintsa-Nguema","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a significant global public health threat that demands serious attention. The proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is primarily attributed to the overuse of antibiotics in humans, livestock, and the agro-industry. However, it is worth noting that antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) can be found in all ecosystems, even in environments where antibiotics have never been utilized. African great apes (AGAs) are our closest living relatives and are known to be susceptible to many of the same pathogens (and other microorganisms) as humans. AGAs could therefore serve as sentinels for human-induced AMR spread into the environment. They can potentially also serve as reservoirs for AMR. AGAs inhabit a range of environments from remote areas with little anthropogenic impact, over habitats that are co-used by AGAs and humans, to captive settings with close human-animal contacts like zoos and sanctuaries. This provides opportunities to study AMR in relation to human interaction. This review examines the literature on AMR in AGAs, identifying knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 16 articles reviewed, 13 focused on wild AGAs in habitats with different degrees of human presence, 2 compared wild and captive apes, and 1 study tested captive apes alone. Ten studies included humans working with or living close to AGA habitats. Despite different methodologies, all studies detected AMR in AGAs. Resistance to beta-lactams was the most common (36%), followed by resistance to aminoglycosides (22%), tetracyclines (15%), fluoroquinolones (10%), sulphonamides (5%), trimethoprim (5%), macrolide (3%), phenicoles (2%) and fosfomycin (1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While several studies suggest a correlation between increased human contact and higher AMR in AGAs, resistance was also found in relatively pristine habitats. While AGAs clearly encounter bacteria resistant to diverse antibiotics, significant gaps remain in understanding the underlying processes. Comparative studies using standardized methods across different sites would enhance our understanding of the origin and distribution of AMR in AGAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a significant global public health threat that demands serious attention. The proliferation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is primarily attributed to the overuse of antibiotics in humans, livestock, and the agro-industry. However, it is worth noting that antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) can be found in all ecosystems, even in environments where antibiotics have never been utilized. African great apes (AGAs) are our closest living relatives and are known to be susceptible to many of the same pathogens (and other microorganisms) as humans. AGAs could therefore serve as sentinels for human-induced AMR spread into the environment. They can potentially also serve as reservoirs for AMR. AGAs inhabit a range of environments from remote areas with little anthropogenic impact, over habitats that are co-used by AGAs and humans, to captive settings with close human-animal contacts like zoos and sanctuaries. This provides opportunities to study AMR in relation to human interaction. This review examines the literature on AMR in AGAs, identifying knowledge gaps.

Results: Of the 16 articles reviewed, 13 focused on wild AGAs in habitats with different degrees of human presence, 2 compared wild and captive apes, and 1 study tested captive apes alone. Ten studies included humans working with or living close to AGA habitats. Despite different methodologies, all studies detected AMR in AGAs. Resistance to beta-lactams was the most common (36%), followed by resistance to aminoglycosides (22%), tetracyclines (15%), fluoroquinolones (10%), sulphonamides (5%), trimethoprim (5%), macrolide (3%), phenicoles (2%) and fosfomycin (1%).

Conclusions: While several studies suggest a correlation between increased human contact and higher AMR in AGAs, resistance was also found in relatively pristine habitats. While AGAs clearly encounter bacteria resistant to diverse antibiotics, significant gaps remain in understanding the underlying processes. Comparative studies using standardized methods across different sites would enhance our understanding of the origin and distribution of AMR in AGAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲类人猿的抗菌素耐药性。
背景/目的:耐抗生素细菌对全球公共卫生构成重大威胁,需要引起高度重视。抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的扩散主要归因于人类、牲畜和农业工业中抗生素的过度使用。然而,值得注意的是,抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)可以在所有生态系统中找到,即使在从未使用抗生素的环境中也是如此。非洲类人猿(AGAs)是我们最亲近的亲戚,众所周知,它们对许多与人类相同的病原体(和其他微生物)很敏感。因此,AGAs可以作为人类诱导的抗菌素耐药性扩散到环境中的哨兵。它们也可能成为抗菌素耐药性的宿主。AGAs生活在各种环境中,从几乎没有人为影响的偏远地区,到AGAs和人类共同使用的栖息地,再到动物园和保护区等人兽密切接触的圈养环境。这为研究与人类互动有关的抗菌素耐药性提供了机会。本文回顾了AGAs中抗菌素耐药性的文献,确定了知识空白。结果:16篇文献中,13篇聚焦于不同人类存在程度生境下的野生AGAs, 2篇比较野生与圈养类人猿,1篇单独考察圈养类人猿。10项研究包括与AGA栖息地工作或生活在其附近的人类。尽管方法不同,但所有研究都检测到了AGAs中的AMR。对-内酰胺类药物的耐药最为常见(36%),其次是氨基糖苷类药物(22%)、四环素类药物(15%)、氟喹诺酮类药物(10%)、磺胺类药物(5%)、甲氧苄啶(5%)、大环内酯类药物(3%)、phenicoles(2%)和磷霉素(1%)。结论:虽然几项研究表明人类接触增加与AGAs较高的抗菌素耐药性之间存在相关性,但在相对原始的栖息地也发现了耐药性。虽然AGAs显然会遇到对多种抗生素具有耐药性的细菌,但在了解其潜在过程方面仍存在重大差距。采用标准化方法进行不同位点间的比较研究,有助于加深对AGAs中抗菌素耐药性起源和分布的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Principal Component Analysis Strategies Lead to Anti-Tuberculosis Natural Product Discovery from Actinomycetes. Evaluation of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Emulsion on Biofilm-Associated Components of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Strains. A VersaTile Approach to Reprogram the Specificity of the R2-Type Tailocin Towards Different Serotypes of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotic Prescription Practice and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study from Jordan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1