Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics14010107
Amanda E Macias, Grant Stimes, Sheldon L Kaplan, Jesus G Vallejo, Kristina G Hulten, J Chase McNeil
{"title":"Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children.","authors":"Amanda E Macias, Grant Stimes, Sheldon L Kaplan, Jesus G Vallejo, Kristina G Hulten, J Chase McNeil","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14010107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clindamycin resistance among community-associated methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (CA-MRSA) complicates the management of a challenging infection. Little data exist to guide clinicians in the management of invasive clindamycin-resistant CA-MRSA infections in children and studies using oral regimens such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and linezolid for treatment of these infections are limited. We sought to reevaluate antibiotic management among invasive CA-MRSA at a tertiary children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cases of invasive clindamycin-resistant MRSA infections in children were identified through an ongoing <i>S. aureus</i> surveillance study. Eligible cases were those occurring in otherwise healthy children from 2011-2021. Medical records were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four subjects met inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were osteomyelitis (n = 17) and deep abscess (n = 7). The median duration of IV therapy was 11.5 days (IQR 6-42 days) and total therapy (IV + oral) was 32 days (IQR 23-42). Overall, 50% of patients were transitioned to oral therapy. Definitive antibiotics used for treatment included vancomycin (n = 15), TMP/SMX (n = 9), linezolid (n = 7), ceftaroline (n = 2), and doxycycline (n = 1). Cure rates were similar across definitive antibiotic therapies (vancomycin-73.3%; TMP/SMX-88.9%; ceftaroline 50%; linezolid and doxycycline-100%). Three subjects died of MRSA disease; two definitively treated with vancomycin and one with ceftaroline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vancomycin is the most commonly used agent in the treatment of invasive clindamycin-resistant CA-MRSA in children at our center. However, TMP/SMX and linezolid can be considered as oral options when completing treatment in select cases. Further work is needed to evaluate the optimal management of these infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clindamycin resistance among community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) complicates the management of a challenging infection. Little data exist to guide clinicians in the management of invasive clindamycin-resistant CA-MRSA infections in children and studies using oral regimens such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and linezolid for treatment of these infections are limited. We sought to reevaluate antibiotic management among invasive CA-MRSA at a tertiary children's hospital.

Methods: Cases of invasive clindamycin-resistant MRSA infections in children were identified through an ongoing S. aureus surveillance study. Eligible cases were those occurring in otherwise healthy children from 2011-2021. Medical records were reviewed.

Results: Thirty-four subjects met inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were osteomyelitis (n = 17) and deep abscess (n = 7). The median duration of IV therapy was 11.5 days (IQR 6-42 days) and total therapy (IV + oral) was 32 days (IQR 23-42). Overall, 50% of patients were transitioned to oral therapy. Definitive antibiotics used for treatment included vancomycin (n = 15), TMP/SMX (n = 9), linezolid (n = 7), ceftaroline (n = 2), and doxycycline (n = 1). Cure rates were similar across definitive antibiotic therapies (vancomycin-73.3%; TMP/SMX-88.9%; ceftaroline 50%; linezolid and doxycycline-100%). Three subjects died of MRSA disease; two definitively treated with vancomycin and one with ceftaroline.

Conclusions: Vancomycin is the most commonly used agent in the treatment of invasive clindamycin-resistant CA-MRSA in children at our center. However, TMP/SMX and linezolid can be considered as oral options when completing treatment in select cases. Further work is needed to evaluate the optimal management of these infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童侵袭性耐克林霉素MRSA社区相关感染的处理和结果。
背景:社区相关性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)的克林霉素耐药性使挑战性感染的管理复杂化。指导临床医生管理儿童侵袭性克林霉素耐药CA-MRSA感染的数据很少,使用口服方案如甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)和利奈唑胺治疗这些感染的研究也很有限。我们试图重新评估一家三级儿童医院侵袭性CA-MRSA的抗生素治疗。方法:通过一项正在进行的金黄色葡萄球菌监测研究,确定儿童侵袭性克林霉素耐药MRSA感染病例。符合条件的病例是2011-2021年期间在其他方面健康儿童中发生的病例。审查了医疗记录。结果:34例受试者符合纳入标准。最常见的诊断为骨髓炎(n = 17)和深脓肿(n = 7)。静脉注射治疗的中位持续时间为11.5天(IQR 6-42天),总治疗时间(静脉注射+口服)为32天(IQR 23-42)。总体而言,50%的患者转为口服治疗。用于治疗的最终抗生素包括万古霉素(n = 15)、TMP/SMX (n = 9)、利奈唑胺(n = 7)、头孢他林(n = 2)和强力霉素(n = 1)。所有最终抗生素治疗的治愈率相似(万古霉素-73.3%;TMP / smx - 88.9%;ceftaroline 50%;利奈唑胺和强力霉素-100%)。3例受试者死于MRSA病;两例用万古霉素治疗,一例用头孢他林治疗。结论:万古霉素是本中心治疗儿童侵袭性克林霉素耐药CA-MRSA最常用的药物。然而,在某些病例完成治疗时,可考虑将TMP/SMX和利奈唑胺作为口服选择。需要进一步的工作来评估这些感染的最佳管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Frog Skin Peptides: Nature's Dual-Action Weapons Against Infection and Cancer. Antimicrobial Resistance and ESBL-Associated Predictors Among Uropathogens: A 2019-2024 Isolate-Level Study. A Risk Model Incorporating the Novel Inflammatory Biomarker CD64 for Predicting Bloodstream Infection in Suspected Cases. Balancing Speed and Cost: Economic Insights from Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Bloodstream Infections. Enhanced In Vitro Stability of Bedaquiline with Ascorbic Acid and Pyruvate During Long-Term Incubation in Mycobacterium Species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1