Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal PCR Testing Protocol.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13121195
Blain Thayer, Jonathan D Edwards, Madeline G Belk, Spencer H Durham
{"title":"Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Nasal PCR Testing Protocol.","authors":"Blain Thayer, Jonathan D Edwards, Madeline G Belk, Spencer H Durham","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) can cause cases of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and nasal colonization with this pathogen increases the risk of infection. Due to its high negative predictive value, multiple studies support using the MRSA nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to discontinue antimicrobials that target MRSA in the setting of a negative test result. The purpose of this project was to assess the utility of a protocol to allow pharmacists the ability to order MRSA nasal PCR screenings in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. <b>Results</b>: The pre-protocol group included a random sample of 100 patients, and the post-protocol group included 625 patients. Vancomycin DOTs when pharmacists ordered PCRs were significantly lower compared to the pre-protocol group (<i>p</i> < 0.5; 95% CI, 0.46-2.24). The average length of stay and readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group (<i>p</i> < 0.05 and <i>p</i> = 0.02, respectively), but there was no significant difference in mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.33). <b>Methods</b>: A protocol was implemented at our institution that allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nasal PCR test in patients with pneumonia. This retrospective chart review compared a cohort of patients who received vancomycin from before implementation of the protocol to patients who received vancomycin after the protocol's implementation. The primary endpoint was vancomycin days of therapy (DOTs) between the pre-protocol group and the post-protocol group. Other endpoints assessed included the length of hospitalization, readmission rates, and mortality. <b>Conclusions</b>: Pharmacists ordering MRSA nasal PCR tests significantly reduced vancomycin DOTs, average length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, contributing to positive outcomes in patients with pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can cause cases of community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and nasal colonization with this pathogen increases the risk of infection. Due to its high negative predictive value, multiple studies support using the MRSA nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test to discontinue antimicrobials that target MRSA in the setting of a negative test result. The purpose of this project was to assess the utility of a protocol to allow pharmacists the ability to order MRSA nasal PCR screenings in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Results: The pre-protocol group included a random sample of 100 patients, and the post-protocol group included 625 patients. Vancomycin DOTs when pharmacists ordered PCRs were significantly lower compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.5; 95% CI, 0.46-2.24). The average length of stay and readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in the post-protocol group compared to the pre-protocol group (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively), but there was no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.33). Methods: A protocol was implemented at our institution that allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nasal PCR test in patients with pneumonia. This retrospective chart review compared a cohort of patients who received vancomycin from before implementation of the protocol to patients who received vancomycin after the protocol's implementation. The primary endpoint was vancomycin days of therapy (DOTs) between the pre-protocol group and the post-protocol group. Other endpoints assessed included the length of hospitalization, readmission rates, and mortality. Conclusions: Pharmacists ordering MRSA nasal PCR tests significantly reduced vancomycin DOTs, average length of stay, and 30-day readmission rates, contributing to positive outcomes in patients with pneumonia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药师主导的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻PCR检测方案的评价。
背景/目的:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)可引起社区获得性肺炎、医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎,鼻腔定植这种病原体增加了感染的风险。由于其较高的阴性预测值,多项研究支持使用MRSA鼻腔聚合酶链反应(PCR)测试,在测试结果为阴性的情况下,停止使用针对MRSA的抗菌剂。本项目的目的是评估一项协议的效用,该协议允许药剂师在住院肺炎患者中订购MRSA鼻腔PCR筛查。结果:方案前组随机纳入100例患者,方案后组纳入625例患者。当药剂师订购pcr时,万古霉素DOTs与方案前组相比显著降低(p < 0.5;95% ci, 0.46-2.24)。方案后组30天的平均住院时间和再入院率显著低于方案前组(p < 0.05和p = 0.02),但死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.33)。方法:我们的机构实施了一项协议,允许药剂师对肺炎患者进行MRSA鼻PCR检测。本回顾性图表综述比较了方案实施前接受万古霉素治疗的患者和方案实施后接受万古霉素治疗的患者。主要终点是方案前组和方案后组之间的万古霉素治疗天数(DOTs)。评估的其他终点包括住院时间、再入院率和死亡率。结论:药剂师订购MRSA鼻PCR检测可显著降低万古霉素DOTs、平均住院时间和30天再入院率,有助于肺炎患者的积极结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Principal Component Analysis Strategies Lead to Anti-Tuberculosis Natural Product Discovery from Actinomycetes. Evaluation of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Emulsion on Biofilm-Associated Components of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Strains. A VersaTile Approach to Reprogram the Specificity of the R2-Type Tailocin Towards Different Serotypes of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotic Prescription Practice and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study from Jordan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1