Effect of Nutritional Intervention on Chemotherapy Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Jiwei Wang, Yong Huang, Xilan Zheng, Ming Xie, Yin Wu, Li Yang, Chunmei Yin
{"title":"Effect of Nutritional Intervention on Chemotherapy Tolerance and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Jiwei Wang, Yong Huang, Xilan Zheng, Ming Xie, Yin Wu, Li Yang, Chunmei Yin","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2449719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the effect of symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention on chemotherapy tolerance and quality of life (QOL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative patients with CRC (<i>n</i> = 88) were randomly assigned to the control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 45) and intervention group (IG, <i>n</i> = 43) receiving conventional diet counseling and symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention, respectively, and chemotherapy tolerance, adverse effects, and QOL were compared. Participants in the IG exhibited better nutritional status at the last chemotherapy cycle, with lower Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (2.37 ± 0.65 vs. 3.78 ± 0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (6.26 ± 0.76 vs. 7.78 ± 0.70, <i>p</i> < 0.01) scores. Compared with CG, relative dose intensity reduction (9.3% vs. 25.89%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), chemotherapy regimen change (25.58% vs. 53.33%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and chemotherapy delay (13.95% vs. 35.56%, <i>p</i> = 0.019) were lower in the IG. Nausea/vomiting (2.33% vs. 17.78%, <i>p</i> = 0.017), thrombocytopenia (2.33% vs. 28.89%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and hand-foot syndrome (4.65% vs. 22.22%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were less frequent in the IG. Participants in the IG had better QOL, with higher physical function scores at cycles 4 (67.91 ± 5.22 vs. 62.22 ± 4.02, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 8 (72.71 ± 6.31 vs. 57.63 ± 4.75, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Individualized nutritional interventions improved chemotherapy tolerance and QOL and reduced adverse effects in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2449719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored the effect of symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention on chemotherapy tolerance and quality of life (QOL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative patients with CRC (n = 88) were randomly assigned to the control group (CG, n = 45) and intervention group (IG, n = 43) receiving conventional diet counseling and symptom-based individualized nutritional intervention, respectively, and chemotherapy tolerance, adverse effects, and QOL were compared. Participants in the IG exhibited better nutritional status at the last chemotherapy cycle, with lower Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (2.37 ± 0.65 vs. 3.78 ± 0.65, p < 0.01) and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (6.26 ± 0.76 vs. 7.78 ± 0.70, p < 0.01) scores. Compared with CG, relative dose intensity reduction (9.3% vs. 25.89%, p = 0.02), chemotherapy regimen change (25.58% vs. 53.33%, p < 0.01), and chemotherapy delay (13.95% vs. 35.56%, p = 0.019) were lower in the IG. Nausea/vomiting (2.33% vs. 17.78%, p = 0.017), thrombocytopenia (2.33% vs. 28.89%, p < 0.01), and hand-foot syndrome (4.65% vs. 22.22%, p = 0.03) were less frequent in the IG. Participants in the IG had better QOL, with higher physical function scores at cycles 4 (67.91 ± 5.22 vs. 62.22 ± 4.02, p < 0.01) and 8 (72.71 ± 6.31 vs. 57.63 ± 4.75, p < 0.01). Individualized nutritional interventions improved chemotherapy tolerance and QOL and reduced adverse effects in this patient cohort.
期刊介绍:
This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.