Ocular Injuries in Patients with Old Blow-out Fractures Following Blunt Trauma.

Tae Hun Kim, Junghoon Kim
{"title":"Ocular Injuries in Patients with Old Blow-out Fractures Following Blunt Trauma.","authors":"Tae Hun Kim, Junghoon Kim","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2024.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the frequency, and clinical characteristics of ocular injuries in patients with prior blow-out fractures who experience new blunt trauma, and to assess whether old orbital fractures provide a protective effect against subsequent ocular trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 1,315 ocular trauma patients were reviewed. A total of 927 patients who had orbital or facial CT scans and ophthalmologist evaluations were considered. After applying exclusion criteria, 568 patients with 581 affected eyes were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of old blow-out fractures, identified on CT scan. The clinical characteristics and the frequency of ocular injuries were compared between the two groups. The risk of ocular injury according to the presence of old blow-out fracture ware studied using multiple logistic regression after controlling age and sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 581 eyes examined, 140 (24.1%) had old blow-out fractures. The incidence of intraocular complications was significantly higher in the no orbital fracture group (20.4%) compared to the old blow-out fracture group (2.1%) (p < 0.001). Specifically, the incidence of complications such as gross hyphema (p = 0.001), globe rupture (p = 0.006), and vitreous hemorrhage (p = 0.027) was significantly greater in the group without old blow-out fractures than in those with them. Multiple logistic regression showed that the presence of old blow-out fractures was significantly associated with reduced risk of ocular injury (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patients with old blow-out fractures had a lower risk of ocular injuries following subsequent blunt trauma. The findings suggest that old fractures may provide protective effect. These results may have important implications for the clinical management of patients at risk of recurrent orbital trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":101356,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2024.0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the frequency, and clinical characteristics of ocular injuries in patients with prior blow-out fractures who experience new blunt trauma, and to assess whether old orbital fractures provide a protective effect against subsequent ocular trauma.

Methods: The medical records of 1,315 ocular trauma patients were reviewed. A total of 927 patients who had orbital or facial CT scans and ophthalmologist evaluations were considered. After applying exclusion criteria, 568 patients with 581 affected eyes were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of old blow-out fractures, identified on CT scan. The clinical characteristics and the frequency of ocular injuries were compared between the two groups. The risk of ocular injury according to the presence of old blow-out fracture ware studied using multiple logistic regression after controlling age and sex.

Results: Among the 581 eyes examined, 140 (24.1%) had old blow-out fractures. The incidence of intraocular complications was significantly higher in the no orbital fracture group (20.4%) compared to the old blow-out fracture group (2.1%) (p < 0.001). Specifically, the incidence of complications such as gross hyphema (p = 0.001), globe rupture (p = 0.006), and vitreous hemorrhage (p = 0.027) was significantly greater in the group without old blow-out fractures than in those with them. Multiple logistic regression showed that the presence of old blow-out fractures was significantly associated with reduced risk of ocular injury (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The patients with old blow-out fractures had a lower risk of ocular injuries following subsequent blunt trauma. The findings suggest that old fractures may provide protective effect. These results may have important implications for the clinical management of patients at risk of recurrent orbital trauma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钝性外伤后陈旧性爆裂性骨折的眼部损伤。
目的:分析既往爆裂性骨折患者发生新发钝性外伤后眼部损伤的频率及临床特点,探讨旧眼眶骨折是否对后续眼部损伤具有保护作用。方法:回顾1315例眼外伤患者的病历资料。共有927名患者接受了眼眶或面部CT扫描和眼科医生的评估。应用排除标准后,568例患者581只眼纳入最终分析。根据CT扫描确定的陈旧性爆裂性骨折的存在将患者分为两组。比较两组患者的临床特点及眼部损伤发生率。在控制年龄和性别后,采用多元logistic回归分析了陈旧性爆裂性骨折的眼损伤风险。结果:581只眼中有140只(24.1%)存在陈旧性爆裂性骨折。无眶内骨折组的眼内并发症发生率(20.4%)明显高于旧眶内骨折组(2.1%)(p < 0.001)。具体而言,无陈旧性爆裂性骨折组的并发症发生率明显高于有陈旧性爆裂性骨折组,如肉眼前房积血(p = 0.001)、眼球破裂(p = 0.006)和玻璃体出血(p = 0.027)。多元logistic回归分析显示,陈旧性爆裂性骨折与眼部损伤风险降低显著相关(p < 0.001)。结论:陈旧性爆裂性骨折患者在钝性外伤后发生眼部损伤的风险较低。研究结果表明,旧骨折可能具有保护作用。这些结果可能对有复发性眶外伤风险患者的临床处理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocular Manifestations of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in HIV after Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: Clinical Use of CD8+ T cell. Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Axis Accuracy between Optical Biometry and Dual Scheimpflug Topography. Ocular Injuries in Patients with Old Blow-out Fractures Following Blunt Trauma. A Case of Bilateral Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma in a Patient with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome. A Case of Macular Serpiginous Choroidopathy with Secondary Choroidal Neovascularization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1