Cell state-dependent allelic effects and contextual Mendelian randomization analysis for human brain phenotypes

IF 31.7 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Nature genetics Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1038/s41588-024-02050-9
Alexander Haglund, Verena Zuber, Maya Abouzeid, Yifei Yang, Jeong Hun Ko, Liv Wiemann, Maria Otero-Jimenez, Louwai Muhammed, Rahel Feleke, Alexi Nott, James D. Mills, Liisi Laaniste, Djordje O. Gveric, Daniel Clode, Ann C. Babtie, Susanna Pagni, Ravishankara Bellampalli, Alyma Somani, Karina McDade, Jasper J. Anink, Lucia Mesarosova, Nurun Fancy, Nanet Willumsen, Amy Smith, Johanna Jackson, Javier Alegre-Abarrategui, Eleonora Aronica, Paul M. Matthews, Maria Thom, Sanjay M. Sisodiya, Prashant K. Srivastava, Dheeraj Malhotra, Julien Bryois, Leonardo Bottolo, Michael R. Johnson
{"title":"Cell state-dependent allelic effects and contextual Mendelian randomization analysis for human brain phenotypes","authors":"Alexander Haglund, Verena Zuber, Maya Abouzeid, Yifei Yang, Jeong Hun Ko, Liv Wiemann, Maria Otero-Jimenez, Louwai Muhammed, Rahel Feleke, Alexi Nott, James D. Mills, Liisi Laaniste, Djordje O. Gveric, Daniel Clode, Ann C. Babtie, Susanna Pagni, Ravishankara Bellampalli, Alyma Somani, Karina McDade, Jasper J. Anink, Lucia Mesarosova, Nurun Fancy, Nanet Willumsen, Amy Smith, Johanna Jackson, Javier Alegre-Abarrategui, Eleonora Aronica, Paul M. Matthews, Maria Thom, Sanjay M. Sisodiya, Prashant K. Srivastava, Dheeraj Malhotra, Julien Bryois, Leonardo Bottolo, Michael R. Johnson","doi":"10.1038/s41588-024-02050-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gene expression quantitative trait loci are widely used to infer relationships between genes and central nervous system (CNS) phenotypes; however, the effect of brain disease on these inferences is unclear. Using 2,348,438 single-nuclei profiles from 391 disease-case and control brains, we report 13,939 genes whose expression correlated with genetic variation, of which 16.7–40.8% (depending on cell type) showed disease-dependent allelic effects. Across 501 colocalizations for 30 CNS traits, 23.6% had a disease dependency, even after adjusting for disease status. To estimate the unconfounded effect of genes on outcomes, we repeated the analysis using nondiseased brains (<i>n</i> = 183) and reported an additional 91 colocalizations not present in the larger mixed disease and control dataset, demonstrating enhanced interpretation of disease-associated variants. Principled implementation of single-cell Mendelian randomization in control-only brains identified 140 putatively causal gene–trait associations, of which 11 were replicated in the UK Biobank, prioritizing candidate peripheral biomarkers predictive of CNS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18985,"journal":{"name":"Nature genetics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":31.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-02050-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gene expression quantitative trait loci are widely used to infer relationships between genes and central nervous system (CNS) phenotypes; however, the effect of brain disease on these inferences is unclear. Using 2,348,438 single-nuclei profiles from 391 disease-case and control brains, we report 13,939 genes whose expression correlated with genetic variation, of which 16.7–40.8% (depending on cell type) showed disease-dependent allelic effects. Across 501 colocalizations for 30 CNS traits, 23.6% had a disease dependency, even after adjusting for disease status. To estimate the unconfounded effect of genes on outcomes, we repeated the analysis using nondiseased brains (n = 183) and reported an additional 91 colocalizations not present in the larger mixed disease and control dataset, demonstrating enhanced interpretation of disease-associated variants. Principled implementation of single-cell Mendelian randomization in control-only brains identified 140 putatively causal gene–trait associations, of which 11 were replicated in the UK Biobank, prioritizing candidate peripheral biomarkers predictive of CNS outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature genetics
Nature genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
241
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature Genetics publishes the very highest quality research in genetics. It encompasses genetic and functional genomic studies on human and plant traits and on other model organisms. Current emphasis is on the genetic basis for common and complex diseases and on the functional mechanism, architecture and evolution of gene networks, studied by experimental perturbation. Integrative genetic topics comprise, but are not limited to: -Genes in the pathology of human disease -Molecular analysis of simple and complex genetic traits -Cancer genetics -Agricultural genomics -Developmental genetics -Regulatory variation in gene expression -Strategies and technologies for extracting function from genomic data -Pharmacological genomics -Genome evolution
期刊最新文献
Mutagenesis and analysis of contrasting wheat lines do not support a role for PFT in Fusarium head blight resistance Multi-omic quantitative trait loci link tandem repeat size variation to gene regulation in human brain The NAT1–bHLH110–CER1/CER1L module regulates heat stress tolerance in rice Loss of Kmt2c or Kmt2d primes urothelium for tumorigenesis and redistributes KMT2A–menin to bivalent promoters Cell state-dependent allelic effects and contextual Mendelian randomization analysis for human brain phenotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1