Subcutaneous weekly semaglutide with automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Nature Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03463-z
Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Michael A. Tsoukas, Alessandra Kobayati, Wedyan Aboznadah, Adnan Jafar, Ahmad Haidar
{"title":"Subcutaneous weekly semaglutide with automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial","authors":"Melissa-Rosina Pasqua, Michael A. Tsoukas, Alessandra Kobayati, Wedyan Aboznadah, Adnan Jafar, Ahmad Haidar","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03463-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts to improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes are ongoing. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial to assess semaglutide as adjunct to automated insulin delivery therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. At each intervention, participants were titrated up to 1 mg or the maximum tolerated dose of semaglutide or placebo over 11 weeks, followed by the use of an automated insulin delivery system for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the target glucose range of 3.9–10.0 mmol l−1 during the last 4 weeks of each intervention. Twenty-eight participants were randomized and 24 completed the trial. The primary endpoint was met. Compared to placebo, semaglutide increased time in the target range by a mean 4.8 (s.d. = 7.6) percentage points (P = 0.006), without increasing the time spent below 3.9 mmol l−1 (P = 0.19) or below 3.0 mmol l−1 (P = 0.65). While no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred during any of the interventions, there were two episodes of recurrent euglycemic ketosis without acidosis during semaglutide use. We conclude that semaglutide improves glycemic control with automated insulin delivery compared to placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05205928 In a crossover trial evaluating semaglutide versus placebo as an add-on to automated insulin delivery therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes, the use of semaglutide was associated with an increased percentage of time spent within the target glucose range, along with reduced insulin requirements.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"31 4","pages":"1239-1245"},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03463-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03463-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts to improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes are ongoing. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial to assess semaglutide as adjunct to automated insulin delivery therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. At each intervention, participants were titrated up to 1 mg or the maximum tolerated dose of semaglutide or placebo over 11 weeks, followed by the use of an automated insulin delivery system for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the target glucose range of 3.9–10.0 mmol l−1 during the last 4 weeks of each intervention. Twenty-eight participants were randomized and 24 completed the trial. The primary endpoint was met. Compared to placebo, semaglutide increased time in the target range by a mean 4.8 (s.d. = 7.6) percentage points (P = 0.006), without increasing the time spent below 3.9 mmol l−1 (P = 0.19) or below 3.0 mmol l−1 (P = 0.65). While no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred during any of the interventions, there were two episodes of recurrent euglycemic ketosis without acidosis during semaglutide use. We conclude that semaglutide improves glycemic control with automated insulin delivery compared to placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05205928 In a crossover trial evaluating semaglutide versus placebo as an add-on to automated insulin delivery therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes, the use of semaglutide was associated with an increased percentage of time spent within the target glucose range, along with reduced insulin requirements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型糖尿病患者每周皮下塞马鲁肽自动胰岛素输送:一项双盲、随机、交叉试验
改善1型糖尿病血糖控制的努力正在进行中。我们进行了一项随机、双盲、交叉试验,以评估西马鲁肽作为成人1型糖尿病患者自动胰岛素输送治疗的辅助手段。在每次干预中,参与者在11周内滴定至1mg或最大耐受剂量的西马鲁肽或安慰剂,随后使用自动胰岛素输送系统4周。主要结局是在每次干预的最后4周内,血糖控制在3.9-10.0 mmol l−1目标范围内的时间百分比。28名参与者被随机分配,其中24人完成了试验。达到了主要终点。与安慰剂相比,semaglutide在目标范围内的时间平均增加了4.8 (s.d = 7.6)个百分点(P = 0.006),而在低于3.9 mmol l−1 (P = 0.19)或低于3.0 mmol l−1 (P = 0.65)的时间没有增加。虽然在任何干预期间没有发生糖尿病酮症酸中毒或严重低血糖,但在使用西马鲁肽期间,有两次复发的正常血糖酮症无酸中毒。我们得出结论,与安慰剂相比,semaglutide通过自动胰岛素输送改善血糖控制。ClinicalTrials.gov注册:NCT05205928
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Remote monitoring of heart failure exacerbations using a smartwatch. Real-world clinical utility of tumor whole-genome sequencing in solid cancers. A biomarker of Alzheimer's disease could be a useful diagnostic tool for other amyloidoses. Liquid biopsy for the diagnosis of EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma in endemic areas. Socioeconomic and energy transition disparities in air pollution-related mortality across Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1