Emergency department and inpatient interhospital transfers for patients with status epilepticus.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1111/epi.18254
Catherine G Suen, Andrew J Wood, James F Burke, Elan L Guterman
{"title":"Emergency department and inpatient interhospital transfers for patients with status epilepticus.","authors":"Catherine G Suen, Andrew J Wood, James F Burke, Elan L Guterman","doi":"10.1111/epi.18254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Interhospital transfers for status epilepticus (SE) are common, and some are avoidable and likely lower yield. The use of interhospital transfer may differ in emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings, which contend with differing clinical resources and financial incentives. However, transfer from these two settings is understudied, leaving gaps in our ability to improve the hospital experience, cost, and triage for this neurologic emergency. We aimed to describe interhospital transfer for SE and examine the relationship between the site of transfer and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study of adult patients with SE who underwent interhospital transfer using data from the State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases of Florida (2016-2019) and New York (2018-2019). The primary outcome was discharge after undergoing transfer. Secondary outcomes were discharge within 1 day, discharge after 30 days, receipt of electroencephalography (EEG), and discharge disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 10 461 encounters for SE. Of 1790 ED encounters without admission to the same hospital, 324 (18.1%) resulted in transfer. Of 8671 hospitalizations, 629 (7.3%) resulted in transfer. Patients transferred from the ED were younger, more likely were White, more likely were in a metro area, and had fewer medical comorbidities than patients transferred from the inpatient setting. The median time to discharge was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.0-9.0) after ED transfer and 10 days (IQR = 4.0-20.0) after inpatient transfer. There were 58 (17.9%) patients who were discharged within 1 day after undergoing transfer from an ED. ED transfers had higher rates of discharge at 30 days and higher likelihood of undergoing EEG at the receiving hospital and being discharged home.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>A high proportion of patients with SE are discharged shortly after undergoing interhospital transfer, particularly those transferred from the ED. Understanding reasons for transfer is a crucial next step in triaging limited inpatient epilepsy resources and reducing costs associated with interhospital transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18254","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Interhospital transfers for status epilepticus (SE) are common, and some are avoidable and likely lower yield. The use of interhospital transfer may differ in emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings, which contend with differing clinical resources and financial incentives. However, transfer from these two settings is understudied, leaving gaps in our ability to improve the hospital experience, cost, and triage for this neurologic emergency. We aimed to describe interhospital transfer for SE and examine the relationship between the site of transfer and hospital length of stay.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of adult patients with SE who underwent interhospital transfer using data from the State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases of Florida (2016-2019) and New York (2018-2019). The primary outcome was discharge after undergoing transfer. Secondary outcomes were discharge within 1 day, discharge after 30 days, receipt of electroencephalography (EEG), and discharge disposition.

Results: There were 10 461 encounters for SE. Of 1790 ED encounters without admission to the same hospital, 324 (18.1%) resulted in transfer. Of 8671 hospitalizations, 629 (7.3%) resulted in transfer. Patients transferred from the ED were younger, more likely were White, more likely were in a metro area, and had fewer medical comorbidities than patients transferred from the inpatient setting. The median time to discharge was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.0-9.0) after ED transfer and 10 days (IQR = 4.0-20.0) after inpatient transfer. There were 58 (17.9%) patients who were discharged within 1 day after undergoing transfer from an ED. ED transfers had higher rates of discharge at 30 days and higher likelihood of undergoing EEG at the receiving hospital and being discharged home.

Significance: A high proportion of patients with SE are discharged shortly after undergoing interhospital transfer, particularly those transferred from the ED. Understanding reasons for transfer is a crucial next step in triaging limited inpatient epilepsy resources and reducing costs associated with interhospital transfer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫病持续状态患者的急诊科和住院院间转院。
目的:癫痫病持续状态(SE)的院间转院是常见的,有些是可以避免的,可能会降低转院率。医院间转院的使用可能在急诊科(ED)和住院设置中有所不同,这与不同的临床资源和财政激励相抗衡。然而,从这两种情况转移的研究不足,在我们改善医院经验、成本和对这种神经紧急情况的分诊方面留下了空白。我们的目的是描述SE的医院间转院,并检查转院地点与住院时间之间的关系。方法:我们使用来自佛罗里达州(2016-2019)和纽约州(2018-2019)的州急诊科数据库和州住院数据库的数据,对接受院间转院的成年SE患者进行了横断面研究。主要结局是转院后出院。次要结局为1天内出院、30天后出院、接受脑电图检查和出院处置。结果:SE患者共10 461例。在1790例未入住同一医院的急诊中,324例(18.1%)转院。在8671例住院中,629例(7.3%)转院。从急诊科转过来的病人更年轻,更可能是白人,更可能在大都市地区,而且比从住院转过来的病人有更少的医疗合并症。中位出院时间为急诊科转院后5天(四分位数间距[IQR] = 2.0 ~ 9.0),住院转院后10天(IQR = 4.0 ~ 20.0)。有58例(17.9%)患者在急诊科转院后1天内出院。急诊科转院患者在30天内出院率较高,在接收医院接受脑电图检查并出院回家的可能性较高。意义:很大比例的SE患者在转院后不久就出院了,特别是那些从急诊科转院的患者。了解转院的原因是对有限的住院癫痫资源进行分诊和降低与转院相关的成本的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Twenty-four-month data and experience from the CORE-VNS study. Neural mass modeling reveals that hyperexcitability underpins slow-wave sleep changes in children with epilepsy. The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities. Risk of epilepsy following first unprovoked and acute seizures: Cohort study. Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1