Unlocking the multidimensionality of plantar pressure measurements for the evaluation of footwear in people with diabetes.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112502
L E Vossen, S A Bus, J J Van Netten
{"title":"Unlocking the multidimensionality of plantar pressure measurements for the evaluation of footwear in people with diabetes.","authors":"L E Vossen, S A Bus, J J Van Netten","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The offloading effectiveness of custom-made footwear for people with diabetes is assessed using plantar pressure measurements. While such pressure data is multidimensional, it is mostly analyzed using a scalar - maximum peak plantar pressure (PMax). We aimed to investigate the associations between multiple peak plantar pressure parameters for footwear assessment and determine whether this assessment depends on the chosen parameter. In-shoe plantar pressure was measured in 77 participants with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and a recent ulcer or amputation history, while walking in their own custom-made footwear. Six peak plantar pressure parameters were extracted, both scalar (i.e. Pmax, time integral and gradient) and multidimensional (i.e. time curve, map and time map). Footwear was ranked from highest to lowest outcome for each parameter and associations with Pmax were compared using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A footwear comparison within subjects using Fleiss' Kappa analysis determined the agreement between parameters using two pairs of footwear of each participant. The rank correlation coefficient was moderate to strong between PMax and the other scalar parameters (ρ = 0.46-0.70), and negligible to weak between PMax and the multidimensional parameters (ρ = 0.03-0.25). Percentage agreement between parameters for the within-subject footwear comparison was poor (47.5 %, κ = 0.0652). We conclude that the association and agreement between in-shoe peak pressure parameters is low and the assessment of offloading effectiveness depends on the chosen parameter. This is the first step in unlocking the potential of a multidimensional approach in plantar pressure analysis, possibly changing how we evaluate footwear offloading effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"180 ","pages":"112502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The offloading effectiveness of custom-made footwear for people with diabetes is assessed using plantar pressure measurements. While such pressure data is multidimensional, it is mostly analyzed using a scalar - maximum peak plantar pressure (PMax). We aimed to investigate the associations between multiple peak plantar pressure parameters for footwear assessment and determine whether this assessment depends on the chosen parameter. In-shoe plantar pressure was measured in 77 participants with diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and a recent ulcer or amputation history, while walking in their own custom-made footwear. Six peak plantar pressure parameters were extracted, both scalar (i.e. Pmax, time integral and gradient) and multidimensional (i.e. time curve, map and time map). Footwear was ranked from highest to lowest outcome for each parameter and associations with Pmax were compared using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. A footwear comparison within subjects using Fleiss' Kappa analysis determined the agreement between parameters using two pairs of footwear of each participant. The rank correlation coefficient was moderate to strong between PMax and the other scalar parameters (ρ = 0.46-0.70), and negligible to weak between PMax and the multidimensional parameters (ρ = 0.03-0.25). Percentage agreement between parameters for the within-subject footwear comparison was poor (47.5 %, κ = 0.0652). We conclude that the association and agreement between in-shoe peak pressure parameters is low and the assessment of offloading effectiveness depends on the chosen parameter. This is the first step in unlocking the potential of a multidimensional approach in plantar pressure analysis, possibly changing how we evaluate footwear offloading effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解锁糖尿病患者鞋履评估足底压力测量的多维度。
使用足底压力测量来评估糖尿病患者定制鞋的卸荷效果。虽然这些压力数据是多维的,但大多使用标量-最大峰值足底压力(PMax)进行分析。我们的目的是研究鞋履评估中多个峰值足底压力参数之间的关系,并确定这种评估是否取决于所选择的参数。研究人员测量了77名患有糖尿病、周围神经病变、近期有溃疡或截肢史的参与者穿着自己定制的鞋子走路时的鞋内足底压力。提取了6个峰值足底压力参数,包括标量参数(即Pmax、时间积分和梯度)和多维参数(即时间曲线、地图和时间地图)。每个参数的结果从高到低对鞋类进行排序,并使用Spearman等级相关系数比较与Pmax的关联。使用Fleiss的Kappa分析在受试者中进行鞋类比较,确定了每个参与者使用两双鞋类的参数之间的一致性。PMax与其他标量参数之间的等级相关系数为中强(ρ = 0.46 ~ 0.70),而PMax与多维参数之间的等级相关系数为弱(ρ = 0.03 ~ 0.25)。受试者内部鞋类比较参数之间的百分比一致性较差(47.5%,κ = 0.0652)。结果表明,鞋内峰值压力参数之间的相关性和一致性较低,卸载效果的评估取决于所选择的参数。这是释放足底压力分析多维方法潜力的第一步,可能会改变我们评估鞋子卸载效果的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Adding secondary cognitive tasks to drop vertical jumps alters the landing mechanics of athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison of shank, rearfoot and forefoot coordination and its variability between runners with different strike patterns. Vastus lateralis muscle architecture, quality, and stiffness are determinants of maximal performance in athletes? 1D Network computational fluid dynamics for evaluating regional pressures in subjects with cement dust exposure. Evaluating interface pressure in a lower-limb prosthetic socket: Comparison of FEM and experimental measurements on a roll-over simulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1