Clinical, Morphologic, and Genomic Differences in Deep Penetrating Nevi and Deep Penetrating Nevus-like Melanomas.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Modern Pathology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100707
Lu Chen, Alice Chen, Natasha Sharma, Pragi Patel, Afua Konadu Addo, Julia Edwin Jeyakumar, Haya Mary Beydoun, Shantel Olivares, David Dittmann, Erica Vormittag-Nocito, Lucas Santana Dos Santos, Lawrence Jennings, Pedram Gerami
{"title":"Clinical, Morphologic, and Genomic Differences in Deep Penetrating Nevi and Deep Penetrating Nevus-like Melanomas.","authors":"Lu Chen, Alice Chen, Natasha Sharma, Pragi Patel, Afua Konadu Addo, Julia Edwin Jeyakumar, Haya Mary Beydoun, Shantel Olivares, David Dittmann, Erica Vormittag-Nocito, Lucas Santana Dos Santos, Lawrence Jennings, Pedram Gerami","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep penetrating nevi (DPNs) are characterized by activating mutations in the MAP kinase and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways that result in large melanocytes with increased nuclear atypia, cytoplasmic pigmentation, and often mitotic activity. Together with a lack of maturation, this constellation of findings creates challenges for pathologists to distinguish deep penetrating nevus (DPN) from DPN-like melanoma. To assess the utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) in resolving this diagnostic dilemma, we performed NGS studies on 35 lesions including 24 DPNs and 11 DPN-like melanomas to characterize the specific genomic differences between the two groups and elucidate the genetic events involved in malignant transformation of DPNs. Compared to DPNs, DPN-like melanomas were clinically larger in size (1.1 vs 0.6 cm, p=0.02) and on histopathologic examination more frequently showed high grade nuclear atypia (11/11 vs 9/24; p=0.00052), increased mitotic activity (mean 3.9 vs 1.3 per mm<sup>2</sup>; p=0.0004), sheet-like growth pattern (5/11 vs 2/24; p=0.01), and involvement of the subcutis (4/5 vs 3/13; p=0.026). From a genomic standpoint, DPN-like melanomas had a higher tumor mutation burden (mean 37.1 vs 7.8 mutations/megabase; p=0.002) than DPNs and more frequently harbored NRAS mutation (3/11 vs 1/24; p=0.046) whereas MAP2K1 in frame deletions were only identified in DPNs (0/11 vs 5/24). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency or type of CTNNB1 or APC mutations between the two groups. Within progression genes, DPN-like melanomas were more frequently found to have pathogenic variants in TERT promoter (7/11 vs 0/24; p<0.00001), CDKN2A (4/11 vs 0/24; p=0.0008), and protein subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (7/11 vs 3/24; p=0.02) compared to DPNs. Our findings provide a framework for employing NGS in the evaluation of deep penetrating melanocytic tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100707"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100707","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep penetrating nevi (DPNs) are characterized by activating mutations in the MAP kinase and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways that result in large melanocytes with increased nuclear atypia, cytoplasmic pigmentation, and often mitotic activity. Together with a lack of maturation, this constellation of findings creates challenges for pathologists to distinguish deep penetrating nevus (DPN) from DPN-like melanoma. To assess the utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) in resolving this diagnostic dilemma, we performed NGS studies on 35 lesions including 24 DPNs and 11 DPN-like melanomas to characterize the specific genomic differences between the two groups and elucidate the genetic events involved in malignant transformation of DPNs. Compared to DPNs, DPN-like melanomas were clinically larger in size (1.1 vs 0.6 cm, p=0.02) and on histopathologic examination more frequently showed high grade nuclear atypia (11/11 vs 9/24; p=0.00052), increased mitotic activity (mean 3.9 vs 1.3 per mm2; p=0.0004), sheet-like growth pattern (5/11 vs 2/24; p=0.01), and involvement of the subcutis (4/5 vs 3/13; p=0.026). From a genomic standpoint, DPN-like melanomas had a higher tumor mutation burden (mean 37.1 vs 7.8 mutations/megabase; p=0.002) than DPNs and more frequently harbored NRAS mutation (3/11 vs 1/24; p=0.046) whereas MAP2K1 in frame deletions were only identified in DPNs (0/11 vs 5/24). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency or type of CTNNB1 or APC mutations between the two groups. Within progression genes, DPN-like melanomas were more frequently found to have pathogenic variants in TERT promoter (7/11 vs 0/24; p<0.00001), CDKN2A (4/11 vs 0/24; p=0.0008), and protein subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (7/11 vs 3/24; p=0.02) compared to DPNs. Our findings provide a framework for employing NGS in the evaluation of deep penetrating melanocytic tumors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深穿透痣和深穿透痣样黑色素瘤的临床、形态学和基因组差异。
深度穿透痣(DPNs)的特征是激活MAP激酶和Wnt/ β -连环蛋白通路的突变,导致核异型性增加的大黑素细胞,细胞质色素沉着,通常有丝分裂活性增加。再加上缺乏成熟,这些发现给病理学家区分深穿透痣(DPN)和DPN样黑色素瘤带来了挑战。为了评估下一代测序(NGS)在解决这一诊断困境中的作用,我们对35个病变进行了NGS研究,包括24个dpn和11个dpn样黑色素瘤,以表征两组之间的特定基因组差异,并阐明dpn恶性转化的遗传事件。与dpn相比,dpn样黑色素瘤的临床尺寸更大(1.1 vs 0.6 cm, p=0.02),组织病理学检查更频繁地显示高级别核异型性(11/11 vs 9/24;P =0.00052),有丝分裂活性增加(平均3.9 vs 1.3 / mm2;P =0.0004),片状生长模式(5/11 vs 2/24;P =0.01),累及皮下(4/5 vs 3/13;p = 0.026)。从基因组的角度来看,dpn样黑色素瘤具有更高的肿瘤突变负担(平均37.1 vs 7.8突变/兆基;p=0.002)比DPNs更频繁地携带NRAS突变(3/11 vs 1/24;p=0.046),而MAP2K1仅在DPNs中被发现(0/11 vs 5/24)。两组间CTNNB1或APC突变的频率和类型差异无统计学意义。在进展基因中,dpn样黑素瘤更常在TERT启动子中发现致病性变异(7/11 vs 0/24;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
期刊最新文献
Frank Invasion in Tall Cell Carcinoma with Reversed Polarity of the Breast: Report of Two Cases. Claudin 18.2 Expression in 1,404 Digestive Tract Adenocarcinomas including 1,175 Colorectal Carcinomas: Distinct Colorectal Carcinoma Subtypes are Claudin 18.2 Positive. Physical Color Calibration of Digital Pathology Scanners for Robust Artificial Intelligence Assisted Cancer Diagnosis. Prediction of response to anti-HER2 therapy using a multigene assay. How Do I Diagnose Fibrolamellar Carcinoma?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1