Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allografts in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1801758
Ayub Ansari, Mirza Baig, Yazan Tanbour, Kazi Syed, Yunus Ahmed, Bryan G Beutel
{"title":"Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allografts in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ayub Ansari, Mirza Baig, Yazan Tanbour, Kazi Syed, Yunus Ahmed, Bryan G Beutel","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knee osteoarthritis significantly impacts mobility and quality of life. This condition is a leading cause of disability in aging populations, with total knee replacement commonly sought in advanced cases. Traditional nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatories, corticosteroid injections, and hyaluronic acid, often provide limited relief, especially in severe cases. Recently, regenerative therapies such as amniotic suspension allografts (ASA) have emerged as promising alternatives due to their anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties, which may counteract the catabolic effects of osteoarthritis. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ASA in reducing pain and improving function among knee osteoarthritis patients. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases initially identified 1,733 studies pertaining to ASA, of which 1,575 were screened, and 9 studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis of ASA in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Data extraction and narrative synthesis focused on outcomes such as pain reduction and functional improvement using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), as well as safety profiles. The results demonstrated notable improvements in pain scores following ASA treatment, as shown by studies reporting increases in KOOS pain scores over 6 months, which generally outperformed hyaluronic acid and saline treatments in pain reduction. Similarly, ASA treatment was associated with substantial improvements in physical function outcome scores, enhancing patients' ability to perform daily activities. Patient-reported outcomes also indicated higher quality of life and functional status, with most patients experiencing high levels of satisfaction. Additionally, ASA's safety profile was favorable, with adverse events primarily mild to moderate in nature, including a few transient events such as knee stiffness and myalgias. This systematic review highlights ASA as an effective therapeutic option for knee osteoarthritis, although further studies focusing on long-term radiographic outcomes and mechanisms of action are recommended to fully establish its benefits and optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis significantly impacts mobility and quality of life. This condition is a leading cause of disability in aging populations, with total knee replacement commonly sought in advanced cases. Traditional nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatories, corticosteroid injections, and hyaluronic acid, often provide limited relief, especially in severe cases. Recently, regenerative therapies such as amniotic suspension allografts (ASA) have emerged as promising alternatives due to their anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties, which may counteract the catabolic effects of osteoarthritis. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ASA in reducing pain and improving function among knee osteoarthritis patients. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases initially identified 1,733 studies pertaining to ASA, of which 1,575 were screened, and 9 studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis of ASA in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Data extraction and narrative synthesis focused on outcomes such as pain reduction and functional improvement using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), as well as safety profiles. The results demonstrated notable improvements in pain scores following ASA treatment, as shown by studies reporting increases in KOOS pain scores over 6 months, which generally outperformed hyaluronic acid and saline treatments in pain reduction. Similarly, ASA treatment was associated with substantial improvements in physical function outcome scores, enhancing patients' ability to perform daily activities. Patient-reported outcomes also indicated higher quality of life and functional status, with most patients experiencing high levels of satisfaction. Additionally, ASA's safety profile was favorable, with adverse events primarily mild to moderate in nature, including a few transient events such as knee stiffness and myalgias. This systematic review highlights ASA as an effective therapeutic option for knee osteoarthritis, although further studies focusing on long-term radiographic outcomes and mechanisms of action are recommended to fully establish its benefits and optimize treatment protocols.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
羊膜悬吊异体移植治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:系统综述。
膝关节骨性关节炎显著影响活动能力和生活质量。这种情况是老年人致残的主要原因,在晚期病例中通常寻求全膝关节置换术。传统的非手术治疗策略,包括抗炎药、皮质类固醇注射和透明质酸,通常只能提供有限的缓解,特别是在严重的病例中。最近,再生疗法如羊膜悬浮液异体移植物(ASA)由于其抗炎和再生特性,可能抵消骨关节炎的分解代谢作用而成为有希望的替代疗法。本系统综述评价了ASA在减轻膝关节骨关节炎患者疼痛和改善功能方面的有效性和安全性。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对PubMed和Embase数据库进行全面搜索,最初确定了1733项与ASA相关的研究,其中1575项被筛选,最终有9项研究符合ASA治疗膝关节骨关节炎的详细分析纳入标准。数据提取和叙述综合的重点是使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及安全性资料来减轻疼痛和功能改善等结果。结果显示ASA治疗后疼痛评分有显著改善,研究报告kos疼痛评分在6个月内增加,在减轻疼痛方面通常优于透明质酸和生理盐水治疗。同样,ASA治疗与身体功能结局评分的显著改善相关,增强了患者进行日常活动的能力。患者报告的结果也表明更高的生活质量和功能状态,大多数患者体验到高水平的满意度。此外,ASA的安全性是有利的,不良事件主要是轻度到中度的,包括一些短暂的事件,如膝关节僵硬和肌痛。本系统综述强调ASA是膝关节骨性关节炎的有效治疗选择,尽管建议进一步研究长期放射学结果和作用机制,以充分确定其益处并优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Intra-Articular Adductor Canal Block Has Equivalent Analgesic Effect to Traditional Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. A Bedside-to-Bench-to-Bedside Journey to Advance Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation towards Biologic Joint Restoration. Analgesic Effect of Intermittent Multiple IPACK Block Combined with ACB in Patients with Flexion Contracture Knee Arthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Fate of the DAIR, Outcomes after 1 Year: A Large Database Study. The 10-Year Outcomes of Single- versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1