Diving Deep Into the Relationship Between Speech Fluency and Second Language Proficiency: A Meta‐Analysis

IF 3.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Learning Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/lang.12701
Xun Yan, Yuyun Lei, Yulin Pan
{"title":"Diving Deep Into the Relationship Between Speech Fluency and Second Language Proficiency: A Meta‐Analysis","authors":"Xun Yan, Yuyun Lei, Yulin Pan","doi":"10.1111/lang.12701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abundant research has indicated fluency features as meaningful predictors of second language proficiency. However, the extent to which different fluency dimensions and features can predict proficiency remains underexplored. This meta‐analysis employed a multilevel modeling approach to synthesize fluency–proficiency relationships from 71 empirical studies from 1959–2023. Additionally, we examined several moderator variables, including task type, learning context, age, and proficiency measure. The correlations found were strongly positive for <jats:italic>speed</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .55), moderately positive for <jats:italic>productivity</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = .38), moderately negative for <jats:italic>breakdown</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = −.33), and weakly negative for <jats:italic>repair</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = −.11). Moderator analyses revealed that task, learning context, and proficiency measure influence fluency–proficiency relationships in the repair, productivity, and speed dimensions, respectively. Post hoc analyses also suggested that the operationalization of breakdown features might make a difference in fluency–proficiency relationships. This study has both theoretical and methodological implications for second language fluency research.","PeriodicalId":51371,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12701","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abundant research has indicated fluency features as meaningful predictors of second language proficiency. However, the extent to which different fluency dimensions and features can predict proficiency remains underexplored. This meta‐analysis employed a multilevel modeling approach to synthesize fluency–proficiency relationships from 71 empirical studies from 1959–2023. Additionally, we examined several moderator variables, including task type, learning context, age, and proficiency measure. The correlations found were strongly positive for speed (r = .55), moderately positive for productivity (r = .38), moderately negative for breakdown (r = −.33), and weakly negative for repair (r = −.11). Moderator analyses revealed that task, learning context, and proficiency measure influence fluency–proficiency relationships in the repair, productivity, and speed dimensions, respectively. Post hoc analyses also suggested that the operationalization of breakdown features might make a difference in fluency–proficiency relationships. This study has both theoretical and methodological implications for second language fluency research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深入探讨语言流利度与第二语言熟练程度之间的关系:一项元分析
大量研究表明,流利度特征是第二语言熟练程度的有意义的预测因素。然而,不同的流利度维度和特征在多大程度上可以预测熟练程度仍未得到充分探索。本meta分析采用多层次建模方法综合了1959-2023年间71项实证研究的流利度-熟练度关系。此外,我们检查了几个调节变量,包括任务类型、学习背景、年龄和熟练程度测量。发现的相关性对速度呈强正相关(r = 0.55),对生产率呈中等正相关(r = 0.38),对故障呈中等负相关(r = - 0.33),对修理呈弱负相关(r = - 0.11)。调节分析显示,任务、学习情境和熟练程度测量分别在修复、生产力和速度维度上影响流利-熟练程度关系。事后分析还表明,分解特征的操作化可能会对流利-熟练关系产生影响。本研究对第二语言流利性研究具有理论和方法意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Learning
Language Learning Multiple-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Language Learning is a scientific journal dedicated to the understanding of language learning broadly defined. It publishes research articles that systematically apply methods of inquiry from disciplines including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, educational inquiry, neuroscience, ethnography, sociolinguistics, sociology, and anthropology. It is concerned with fundamental theoretical issues in language learning such as child, second, and foreign language acquisition, language education, bilingualism, literacy, language representation in mind and brain, culture, cognition, pragmatics, and intergroup relations. A subscription includes one or two annual supplements, alternating among a volume from the Language Learning Cognitive Neuroscience Series, the Currents in Language Learning Series or the Language Learning Special Issue Series.
期刊最新文献
What Proactive Language Learning Theory Is and Is Not: A Response to Atkinson's Commentary Diving Deep Into the Relationship Between Speech Fluency and Second Language Proficiency: A Meta‐Analysis Incidental Nonspeech Auditory Learning Scaffolds Phonetic, Category, and Word Learning in a Foreign Language Classroom Meaning‐Inferencing Versus Meaning‐Given Procedures: The Case of Idioms Dialect‐Specific Modes Influence Second Language Production: Evidence From Bidialectal Shanghai–Mandarin Chinese Learners of English Within the Second Language Linguistic Perception Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1